Re: [boinc_dev] Windows 7 Boinc client service fails to run wrappersuccessfully

2014-10-04 Thread Rom Walton
I've updated the wrapper wiki page to point to 26011 of the wrapper which should resolve this issue. See: http://boinc.berkeley.edu/trac/wiki/WrapperApp -- Rom Sent from Surface From: Bill Flynn Sent: ‎Friday‎, ‎October‎ ‎3‎, ‎2014 ‎9‎:‎23‎ ‎PM To: BOINC Dev Mailing List

Re: [boinc_dev] High priority status message removed.

2014-10-04 Thread Charles Elliott
You can still easily get into deadline trouble with either large queues, or multiple projects and an occasional tight deadline Proof? From: McLeod, John [mailto:john.mcl...@sap.com] Sent: Friday, October 3, 2014 10:54 PM To: jacob_w_kl...@msn.com; r.haselgr...@btopenworld.com;

Re: [boinc_dev] High priority status message removed.

2014-10-04 Thread Richard Haselgrove
Just observe. I'm currently running two SIMAP tasks which were issued with a two-day deadline (additional replications required for validation - they must be using reliable_reduced_delay_boundX/reliable_reduced_delay_bound When a need-reliable result is sent to a reliable host, multiply the

Re: [boinc_dev] High priority status message removed.

2014-10-04 Thread McLeod, John
That is one I had forgotten about. BOINC is probably correct in running these in EDF as there is likely to be a bit more than 2 days of work on that machine, and if they waited their turn, they would be returned late. Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com) -Original

Re: [boinc_dev] High priority status message removed.

2014-10-04 Thread Jacob Klein
And a user might want to know why such tasks are running ahead of other tasks that would otherwise have been chosen to run. I have a new proposal... which expresses the urgency, expresses the reasoning, and doesn't use priority. David: What do you think of: Running immediately to meet deadline

Re: [boinc_dev] High priority status message removed.

2014-10-04 Thread Erik Veit
Set a two day queue, and BOINC panics. Use the words that the users are already using. “Panic Mode”. It’s concise, easily understandable, no confusion with system priority, and is the term BOINC users have been using for years to describe it on all the forums. On Oct 4, 2014, at 5:48

Re: [boinc_dev] High priority status message removed.

2014-10-04 Thread David Anderson
There are actually 2 exceptions to round-robin: - jobs that would miss their deadline in round-robin - jobs that haven't checkpointed The question is whether we should show this info in the GUI. My inclination is to show it in the event log rather than the GUI. However we express it in the GUI,

Re: [boinc_dev] High priority status message removed.

2014-10-04 Thread McLeod, John
Panic is a word that we really do not want to use. When you panic, you stop thinking... Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com) -Original Message- From: Erik Veit [zombi...@mac.com] Received: Saturday, 04 Oct 2014, 10:26AM To: boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu

Re: [boinc_dev] High priority status message removed.

2014-10-04 Thread McLeod, John
The debug messages tend to be a bit cryptoc, and most users never turn them on. Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com) -Original Message- From: David Anderson [da...@ssl.berkeley.edu] Received: Saturday, 04 Oct 2014, 11:02AM To: Jacob Klein

Re: [boinc_dev] BOINCscheduling plan class possible issue

2014-10-04 Thread Charles Elliott
For a better design, the BOINC client needs to inform the server of the models and capabilities, of each GPU, and possibly have the scheduler indicate which tasks can run on which GPUs. It is not clear that Boinc actually knows the correct video card capabilities. One of my computers has

Re: [boinc_dev] High priority status message removed.

2014-10-04 Thread Erik Veit
But that’s exactly what BOINC *is* doing. It’s stopped thinking, and is no longer considering all the normal scheduling rules. It’s scheduling on pure fear (panic) of a missed deadline. On Oct 4, 2014, at 8:04 AM, McLeod, John john.mcl...@sap.com wrote: Panic is a word that we really do

Re: [boinc_dev] High priority status message removed.

2014-10-04 Thread McLeod, John
Also remember that missed deadlines may mean that the work does not count. Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com) -Original Message- From: Erik Veit [zombi...@mac.com] Received: Saturday, 04 Oct 2014, 11:38AM To: McLeod, John [john.mcl...@sap.com] CC:

Re: [boinc_dev] High priority status message removed.

2014-10-04 Thread McLeod, John
No. After conidrrstion, BOINC has decided that particles task needs to get some extra time now to avoid missing a deadline later. Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com) -Original Message- From: Erik Veit [zombi...@mac.com] Received: Saturday, 04 Oct 2014, 11:38AM

Re: [boinc_dev] High priority status message removed.

2014-10-04 Thread Erik Veit
You just said the same thing I did, but with different words. My point is that we should be using the terms people are already familiar with, and not getting all tangled up with creating new terms that mean roughly the same thing. , creating even more confusion. Also, we shouldn’t be hiding

Re: [boinc_dev] High priority status message removed.

2014-10-04 Thread McLeod, John
BOINC may be running tasks out of round robin order, but it is not panicking. Panic has the connotation of inconsidered fright. That is not what BOINC is doing. BOINC is considering the situa t ion and making a decision based on the best available knowledge. This is not panicking. Sent from my