Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 11:32 AM 8/6/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
I think this is a badly-chosen name. Both POSIX and Python have a
basename function which does roughly what our leaf() function does.
...
I don't think we should use creative naming in cases like
Daniel Frey wrote:
Edward Diener wrote:
You can turn on the literal flag type. All characters in your regular
expression are treated as literals.
That doesn't help. Maybe an example clarifies what I need:
std::string s = 1.30.0;
boost::regex r( ^(.*)\s+(?:[Vv](?:ersion)?\s+ + s + )\s*$ );
Philippe A. Bouchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah I like Notus (kinda looks like Lotus).
Exactly. Have you considered your reply when IBM's lawyers contact you
over a possible trademark infringement?
I immediately associated the name with Lotus Notes - I am sure they
will to if Notus turns
I have modified the 1.30.0 SRPM for 1.30.1. Pretty simple, except you need a
patch to fix the version number or the RPM build will fail.
Should I upload the SRPM somewhere?
pgp0.pgp
Description: signature
Aleksey Gurtovoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
Matthias Troyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dear Boosters,
Since some of the applications and libraries we plan on releasing soon
rely on Boost features and bugfixes that are in the CVS but not in
Boost 1.30.[012] I
--- Brock Peabody [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
That might be a better way to go. I just don't know
enough about GUI
systems other than MFC to be able to envision what a
scheme like that
would look like or if it would succeed. You might
save a lot of work
coming up with a single low-level
Front end localization could change this also, I believe. For instance if
a
dll or message catalog substitutes '!' for '$' wouldn't I need to escape
'!'
instead of '$' in order to use '!' as a literal in an expression ?
Yes, I was afraid you would bring that up :-)
In this regard it would
Given that I have a string 's' from somewhere, I'd like to create a
regular expression where some part must match that string. The problem
is, the 's' could contain characters that have a special meaning in
regular expressions. Is there some support function that can provide an
escaped
- Original Message -
From: Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Boost mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Boost mailing list'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 8:31 AM
Subject: RE: [boost] Re: UI++ [was: GUI sublanguage; Re: Re: Re: Re: GUI/GDI
template library]
At 09:27 AM
John Maddock wrote:
Front end localization could change this also, I believe. For
instance if
a
dll or message catalog substitutes '!' for '$' wouldn't I need to
escape
'!'
instead of '$' in order to use '!' as a literal in an expression ?
Yes, I was afraid you would bring that up :-)
From: David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I need the ability to do interprocess synchronization through file
locking, c.f. Java.File.createNewFile and Java.File.deleteOnExit:
...
On Posix, the first one would be done with
open(..., O_CREAT | O_EXCL)
and the second, I suppose, would be done
- Original Message -
From: Douglas Gregor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 8:32 PM
Subject: Re: what happened to allocators in boost?
The allocator design focused on the benefits one could get from
specialized
allocators for
Now that the interest for this kind of library has been shown (or not,
whatever) could the interested parties please coordinate
their efforts using other means than boost mailing list?
IIUC
this list is for issues with existing code (problems, usage
patterns etc) and for submissions that
Alisdair Meredith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is a problem with the Borland BCB6 compiler specializing std::swap
for user defined types when using the STLport standard library. This
may apply to other compilers using the library as well, but only have
experience with Borland.
An
I have a need to generate header files which are then subsequently used
in a source file and built.
If i have a file called xxx.y, which is used as an input to a program
to generate xxx.hpp, and xxx.hpp is included in xxx.cpp I should
(I thought) be able to do something like this:
rule Tangle
Hi Gabriel,
you wrote:
| On the other hand if your native compiler is GCC and your system
was
| not configured with that setting, then you may get into trouble --
| since you'll be mixing translation units with different ABIs.
|
| Furthermore, that sounds like a workaround. Isn't
Rob Lori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
Sigh, it sounds like pretty much everyone is of this same
opinion. Sure it makes a nice C++ interface, but it doesn't
allow much extensibility,
[...]
Yeah, but it depends on what our goals are in the future.
Aleksey Gurtovoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
Matthias Troyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dear Boosters,
Since some of the applications and libraries we plan on releasing soon
rely on Boost features and bugfixes that are in the CVS but not in
Boost 1.30.[012] I
Victor A. Wagner, Jr. wrote:
I finally had a chance to go back and look at an attempt to use lambda in
one of my commercial endeavors. It turns out that I was getting ambiguous
_1 with my compiler (VC.net2003) between lambda and bind.
Boost.lambda places _1 in the boost::lambda namespace.
That reminds me of something I was thinking about your post on
wxWindows. Someone could always write a 'driver' targeting wxWindows if
they want quick access to all of the platforms it supports and don't
mind the LGPL.
Brock
Not _exactly_ LGPL. To quote from the wxWindows (2.4.0)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of E. Gladyshev
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 10:51 AM
To: Boost mailing list
Subject: Re: [boost] Re: Re: Re: GUI sublanguage ?
[...]
I think the library should be scaleable in respect to
the
Brian Simpson wrote:
The implementation reasoning runs like this: It seems that the problem
with
building a switch statement to implement type selection is that a switch
statement can't be built incrementally--it is a syntactic construct. (The
currently accepted solution builds an
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 10:11:20 -0700, Stephan T. Lavavej wrote
[Jeff Garland]
The downside of this is that when you are printing a time duration:
std::cout td.hours() ':' td.minutes() ':' td.seconds();
you have to take remove the sign from the minutes and seconds.
I have a third
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Maddock wrote:
|
| One final point - there was a reason that I moved regex to use automatic
| library selection and ABI fixing - without it I was getting a tonne of
| support requests along the lines of Your library doesn't work, it just
| crashes
Perhaps Perseus, who slew the Medusa, the snake-haired monster of
so frightful an aspect that no living thing could behold her without
being turned into stone.
Perseus avoid being turned to stone by clever use of indirection --
he avoided looking directly at Medusa, instead looking only at her
I note that the 'precision' number of digits in lexical cast is obtained from
digits10 +1
if(std::numeric_limitsTarget::is_specialized)
{
stream.precision(std::numeric_limitsTarget::digits10 + 1);
}
If, as I believe correct, the objective is to get all digits that can be
significant,
David B. Held wrote:
[...]
Well, honestly, I can't wrap my head around the big vision for how
this thing is proposed to get implemented, so maybe I don't know
what I'm talking about here. But it seems to me that Layer 0 for
existing GUIs could be designed in such a way that you could
offer
- Original Message -
From: E. Gladyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am wondering what happened to the allocator idiom in
boost. Was it left out intentially?
I can control all memory allocation details in STL
(orthogonally to data types) but not in boost.
It seems like a step backward
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Neal,
Neal D. Becker wrote:
| Some time back I mentioned I was interested in iterator adaptors to
convert
| between vectors of complex and scalar. I have looked at using the
iterator
| adaptor framework in boost. It appears that it is easy enough
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of E. Gladyshev
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 11:33 AM
To: Boost mailing list
Subject: RE: [boost] GUI/GDI template library
[...]
To the method 1 pros list:
- More user friendly. If the user
It appears that the tagging step for Version_1_30_1 got messed up
somehow.
Please have a look at RC_1_30_2, which is our release candidate for
Version 1_30_2, and let me know if there are any problems.
Thanks,
Dave
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
31 matches
Mail list logo
