Jens Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió en el mensaje news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fernando Cacciola wrote:
Recently, Jens Maurer changed the guard at function scope
from:
#ifndef __GNUC__
to
#ifndef BOOST_NO_STDC_NAMESPACE
and honestly, I didn't looked much at it as I should.
David Abrahams wrote:
I have fixed the last regression (the one with crc_test) in CVS, so
as soon as you've made your patch and we've had one more round of
testing, I'm going to tag it for release. Please let me know the
instant you're finished.
Bad news, there is a new problem: One test uses
an
Martin Wille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
I have fixed the last regression (the one with crc_test) in CVS, so
as soon as you've made your patch and we've had one more round of
testing, I'm going to tag it for release. Please let me know the
instant you're finished.
Hi...
Instead of downloading the complete Boost every time something has changed,
why don't you consider 1.30.0 as a standard from subsequent releases until
you reach 1.4.0 and so that we can only download only the modified
libraries?
Mohammed
___
Martin Wille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
I have fixed the last regression (the one with crc_test) in CVS, so
as soon as you've made your patch and we've had one more round of
testing, I'm going to tag it for release. Please let me know the
instant you're finished.
Bad
Mohamed Iqbal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi...
Instead of downloading the complete Boost every time something has changed,
why don't you consider 1.30.0 as a standard from subsequent releases until
you reach 1.4.0 and so that we can only download only the modified
libraries?
You can use CVS
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fernando Cacciola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fernando Cacciola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The page is:
Fernando Cacciola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fernando Cacciola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fernando Cacciola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fernando Cacciola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[sniped]
How do I apply the patch?
I mean, what do I do with CVS to have it on the right branch/tag.
(I guess that if I just commit it, it won't end on the right place)
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fernando Cacciola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
There are still problems with Optional, related to some compilers
not finding std swap(). I wrote the original code following
compressed_pair.hpp, which is via
Peter Dimov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Fernando Cacciola wrote:
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which compilers are failing and where are the regression report
pages?
Sorry for the delay, I was leaving the office when you posted this
Most
Fernando Cacciola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't understand the problem with the original code
(as of revision 1.19), and I don't understand why
1.30.0 fails.
RC_1_30_0 is working for me with gcc-3.2 on Win32.
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
-Original Message-
From: Fernando Cacciola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Note: although this library is new, google shows (to my
satisfaction) that there are already a couple of users of
Optional out there.
Simple and effective. It is in a production system here.
Many thanks,
David Abrahams wrote:
Martin Wille writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
NOTICE:
If I don't hear of any new problems with the RC_1_30_0 branch I'm
going to release 1.30.2 tomorrow (Wed) evening or Thursday morning.
Not new: there are still some regressions for Linux:
crc_test regresses for gcc3.1 and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Maddock wrote:
|Just out of curiosity. What the heck is librt?
|
|
| It contains the POSIX realtime feature set (used by boost.threads, and
hence
| tested by boost.config for timeouts and thread priorities and the like).
Ahhh.. Thanks!
Thomas
-
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fernando Cacciola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fernando Cacciola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There are still problems with Optional, related
David Abrahams wrote:
Martin Wille writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
NOTICE:
If I don't hear of any new problems with the RC_1_30_0 branch I'm
going to release 1.30.2 tomorrow (Wed) evening or Thursday morning.
Not new: there are still some regressions for Linux:
crc_test regresses for gcc3.1 and
Fernando Cacciola wrote:
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which compilers are failing and where are the regression report
pages?
Sorry for the delay, I was leaving the office when you posted this
Most problems related to swap ocurr with GCC3.3
Fernando Cacciola wrote:
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
Well, 3.4 isn't even a released compiler so As far as I'm concerned
it doesn't count.
I added 3.4 only for informational purpose. There is no
point in actively support a compiler that is still
Hi,
There are still problems with Optional, related to some compilers not finding std
swap().
I wrote the original code following compressed_pair.hpp, which is via unqualified call
(to
activate ADL), plus a using declaration at function scope for GCC.
Recently, Jens Maurer patched it adding an
David Abrahams wrote:
Peter Dimov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Fernando Cacciola wrote:
Most problems related to swap ocurr with GCC3.3 and VC==6.0
It appears that this problem ocurrs both with 1.30.0 and the current
rc 1.30.2
What's so surprising here? Everything fails exactly as it should.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Wille wrote:
| David Abrahams wrote:
|
|
| The config_test regression was caused by not having linked against
| librt. I added these lines to intel-linux.jam on the RC_1_30_0 branch:
Just out of curiosity. What the heck is librt?
Thomas
- --
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fernando Cacciola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The page is: http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-Linux.html
So it should correspond to the HEAD revision.
IIUC, the HEAD revision contains Jen's broken patch, so
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 16:50, Martin Wille wrote:
The link failures for the format tests and the ios_state_test likely
isn't an indication of a problem in the respective libraries.
I was in holidays, sorry I did not respond earlier.
I gave a look at the regression reports, and indeed the
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 22:15:28 -0700, Stephan T. Lavavej wrote
[Dave Abrahams]
If I don't hear of any new problems with the RC_1_30_0 branch I'm
going to release 1.30.2 tomorrow (Wed) evening or Thursday morning.
There's one little problem... it doesn't compile cleanly under
-Wshadow with
The link failures for the format tests and the ios_state_test likely
isn't an indication of a problem in the respective libraries.
I was in holidays, sorry I did not respond earlier.
I gave a look at the regression reports, and indeed the pthread linking
problem must be rather unrelated
Just out of curiosity. What the heck is librt?
It contains the POSIX realtime feature set (used by boost.threads, and hence
tested by boost.config for timeouts and thread priorities and the like).
John.
___
Unsubscribe other changes:
[Jeff Garland]
I'm not going to check in that change because I've been making plenty
other of changes and I don't want to do anything that might
destabalize 1.30.2. Besides, I would not want to impose any additional
delay for Dave and others by forcing another round of regression testing
Thomas Witt wrote:
Martin Wille wrote:
| David Abrahams wrote:
|
|
| The config_test regression was caused by not having linked against
| librt. I added these lines to intel-linux.jam on the RC_1_30_0 branch:
Just out of curiosity. What the heck is librt?
It contains the implementation of the
Fernando Cacciola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
There are still problems with Optional, related to some compilers
not finding std swap(). I wrote the original code following
compressed_pair.hpp, which is via unqualified call (to activate
ADL), plus a using declaration at function scope for
Fernando Cacciola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fernando Cacciola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There are still problems with Optional, related to some compilers
not finding std swap(). I wrote the original code following
Samuel Krempp wrote:
format_test1 / intel-7.1
Linker output:
/opt/intel/compiler70/ia32/lib/libcprts.a(xmtx.o)(.text+0x73): In
function `_Mtxinit':
undefined reference to `pthread_mutex_init'
[...]
/opt/intel/compiler70/ia32/lib/libunwind.a(ptn_ix86.o)(.text+0x76):
In function `.B2.2':
Fernando Cacciola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fernando Cacciola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The page is: http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-Linux.html
So it should correspond to the HEAD revision.
IIUC, the
33 matches
Mail list logo
