On Tuesday 21 January 2003 04:18 am, John Maddock wrote:
> The linux status page is still all messed up: the library names are missing
> as are test type from the table, would it be possible to modify your
> scripts to use a variant of boost-path/tools/regression/run_tests.sh?
> (Since we know tha
On Tuesday 21 January 2003 05:33 pm, Beman Dawes wrote:
> At 08:05 PM 1/21/2003, Alkis Evlogimenos wrote:
> >On Tuesday 21 January 2003 04:18 am, John Maddock wrote:
> >> The linux status page is still all messed up: the library names are
> >
> >missing
> >
> >> as are test type from the tabl
At 08:05 PM 1/21/2003, Alkis Evlogimenos wrote:
>On Tuesday 21 January 2003 04:18 am, John Maddock wrote:
>> The linux status page is still all messed up: the library names are
>missing
>> as are test type from the table, would it be possible to modify your
>> scripts to use a variant of boost-path
On Tuesday 21 January 2003 04:18 am, John Maddock wrote:
> The linux status page is still all messed up: the library names are missing
> as are test type from the table, would it be possible to modify your
> scripts to use a variant of boost-path/tools/regression/run_tests.sh?
> (Since we know tha
> Now they do :-)
Alkis,
The linux status page is still all messed up: the library names are missing
as are test type from the table, would it be possible to modify your scripts
to use a variant of boost-path/tools/regression/run_tests.sh? (Since we
know that that one does the right thing on lin
> Enjoy.
Altogether way too cool :-)
Nice work!
John Maddock
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/index.htm
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
> >What is the subinclude feature and where is it documented?
>
>I've just updated the regression docs in CVS. See
>http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/boost/boost/more/regression.
>html?rev=1.8
Hey this is great, no more 'singleton' jam files for tests! Fortunately
I just
At 12:38 PM 1/20/2003, Jeff Garland wrote:
>
>>The date is important; since the subinclude feature became available
>>recently people have been adding tests.
>
>What is the subinclude feature and where is it documented?
I've just updated the regression docs in CVS. See
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/
At 04:08 AM 1/20/2003, Toon Knapen wrote:
>On Monday 20 January 2003 03:14, Rene Rivera wrote:
>> In order to make regression test browsing more pleasant for all of us.
I
>> decided to work up a little script to gather up all the test results
that
>> get posted to the boost.sourceforge.net site.
>The date is important; since the subinclude feature became available
>recently people have been adding tests.
What is the subinclude feature and where is it documented?
Jeff
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listin
On Sunday 19 January 2003 07:14 pm, Rene Rivera wrote:
> The Linux tests don't use the new regression programs?
Now they do :-)
--
Alkis
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
At 09:53 PM 1/19/2003, Jeff Garland wrote:
>Nice! Any explanation why so many more tests on Win32 and BSD (300+) than
>on say Linux (~200)?
The date is important; since the subinclude feature became available
recently people have been adding tests.
Thus the December linux tests reported 203 tes
[2003-01-20] Rene Rivera wrote:
>[2003-01-20] Toon Knapen wrote:
>
>>
>>How come it picked up cs-aix.html and not cs-vacpp6.html. The latter is
the
>
>What it did not pick was the "cs-vacpp-links_6.html", and that's because of
>the extra "_6". If those where "cs-vacpp6-links.html" and "cs-vacpp6.
[2003-01-20] Toon Knapen wrote:
>On Monday 20 January 2003 03:14, Rene Rivera wrote:
>> In order to make regression test browsing more pleasant for all of us. I
>> decided to work up a little script to gather up all the test results that
>> get posted to the boost.sourceforge.net site. So browse o
On Monday 20 January 2003 03:14, Rene Rivera wrote:
> In order to make regression test browsing more pleasant for all of us. I
> decided to work up a little script to gather up all the test results that
> get posted to the boost.sourceforge.net site. So browse on over to:
>
> http://boost.sourc
On Monday 20 January 2003 03:14, Rene Rivera wrote:
> In order to make regression test browsing more pleasant for all of us. I
> decided to work up a little script to gather up all the test results that
> get posted to the boost.sourceforge.net site. So browse on over to:
>
> http://boost.sourc
[2003-01-19] Jeff Garland wrote:
>
>> In order to make regression test browsing more pleasant for all of us. I
>> decided to work up a little script to gather up all the test results that
>> get posted to the boost.sourceforge.net site. So browse on over to:
>>
>> http://boost.sourceforge.net
On Sunday 19 January 2003 09:14 pm, Rene Rivera wrote:
> In order to make regression test browsing more pleasant for all of us. I
> decided to work up a little script to gather up all the test results that
> get posted to the boost.sourceforge.net site. So browse on over to:
>
> http://boost.so
> In order to make regression test browsing more pleasant for all of us. I
> decided to work up a little script to gather up all the test results that
> get posted to the boost.sourceforge.net site. So browse on over to:
>
> http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs
>
> ..and take a look.
19 matches
Mail list logo
