Rene Rivera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Nice to know, but AFAIK (C) does have legal standing; but only if used in
| addition to Copyright. And yes the command as previously posted checked
| for copyright only :-)
But of course if Copyright is present, then (C) is utterly
redundant. It was my
Daryle Walker wrote:
[Apologies to the computer scientist who came up with that phrase
(w.r.t. GOTOs)]
I haven't looked at the serialization library that was just up for
review, but some of the comments I saw on this list suggested that the
archive classes use virtual operators for reading or
[2002-11-25] Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Rene Rivera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Nice to know, but AFAIK (C) does have legal standing; but only if used
in
| addition to Copyright. And yes the command as previously posted checked
| for copyright only :-)
But of course if Copyright is present,
Dear Gennadiy,
I've just been trying out the latest (1.29.0) release of the Boost
Unit Test Framework. I ran into a few minor localisation hiccups you
might want to be told about.
I'm using Metrowerks Codewarrior 8.1 on MacOS 9.2. A couple of
problems resulted directly from this.
5.2 registration - A brief recap:
You did not comment on my Issue 1 and proposition to completely separate
registration into template parameter. This way you won't need any macro. The
user will choose what kind of registration system he prefer at the later
stage.
Gennadiy.
Eric Woodruff wrote:
snip
* Support for Event-Driven and Blocking sockets This one should go
without saying. The event-driven support can trivially be provided
in the pure socket interface and easily created using tools like
boost::signals or boost::function.
** Thread Pool For
Any experiences using boost-libs with Borland Builder 6, specially BGL and
MPL? Already performed or anyone attempted some Regression Tests?
--
vladimir sykora
morphochem AG
gmunder str. 37-37a
81379 muenchen
tel. ++49-89-78005-0
fax ++49-89-78005-555
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* A serialization of bool is missing - easy to fix
I don't understand what you mean. basic_[i|o]archive contain:
Sorry, I missed that because it is separate from the other virtual
functions and not implemented in the b[io]archive class on which I
based my XDR implementation.
* The code
From: Christophe Meessen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
I was looking for some documentation on using intrusive_ptr but they are
apparently not documented. Looking at the header files I got some hints
how to use them.
Why are the intrusive_ptr not documented ? Does it mean that it is not
standard
From: David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter Dimov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can we add -Wno-non-virtual-dtor to g++ tests? The ability of shared_ptr
to
support nonvirtual destructors is an essential feature, and the tests do
exercize it.
Can't you just add
On Sun, 2002-11-24 at 21:23, Jeff Garland wrote:
Is there a reason why we can't define a simple socket library first
as a lower layer without the complications of multiplexing and
threading and then add those on top?
Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote:
That seems reasonable, since due to the
Could we arrange a review of the I/O stuff I currently have in the
sandbox? The files are:
boost/io/array_stream.hpp
boost/io/iomanip.hpp
boost/io/streambuf_wrapping.hpp
boost/io_fwd.hpp [updated]
libs/io/doc/array_stream.html
libs/io/doc/index.html [updated]
libs/io/doc/iomanip.html
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 11:18:10PM +0100, Terje Sletteb? wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 07:27:42PM +0100, Terje Sletteb? wrote:
From: Pavol Droba [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reinterpret-cast could be avoided like this:
template typename T
inline T* offset_cast( void* p, unsigned
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 10:30, Markus Schöpflin wrote:
And I think it would be really important to provide a clean
interaction model between the socket library and the thread library
and a clean solution to the problems that keep on coming up again and
again when doing socket programming.
hi boosters:
http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl?BoostSocket/SocketSetConcept
Can we use std::set like method names...
remove - erase
add - insert
is_set - count (I'm not fussed about this one)
Wrap fd_set is interesting, but I don't think it is necessary.
IMHO,
code fragments such as:
line 95-96 of archive.cpp seem unacceptable to me:
// note breaking a rule here - is this a problem on some platform
is.read(const_castchar *(s.data()), size);
Although is non standard I believe that the above code will work on all
known platforms.
It yields an
From: Pavol Droba [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 07:27:42PM +0100, Terje Sletteb? wrote:
For example, if you have a buffer like this (starting at an aligned
address):
+0 - One byte
+1 - Number 1
+5 - Number 2
+9 - Number 3
Even if you have a struct with three
Recently at our company we had a couple of bugs relating to people
incorrectly writing comparison operators, so I came up with this little
helper. It is very trivial, but useful none the less as bogus comparison
operators can be the cause of many bugs.
Obviously it could be improved to take a
vladimir josef sykora [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
Is there a way to apply a binary operation over two sequences?
For example, I have two sequences: LHSseq and RHSseq. I want now to
construct the return type, which is a sequence that cointains the result
types of applying a binary
Le ven 22/11/2002 à 19:22, Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
Boost.Format uses locale, sstream and ostream none of these
headers exist with the c++ lib distributed with gcc 2.95 or 2.96.
That's right, I noticed this problem too. Instead of including the
minimal headers as specified in the norm, I
Hu Xinwei wrote:
- How to interupt a thread waiting on some socket event
(synchronous and asynchronous) from another thread?
IMHO, I dont think such a mechanism is needed.
A typical example: You have a thread that implements a synchronous
listener like this:
bind();
listen();
while (true)
Hi,
The boost::any type is currently limited because it's impossible to be used
as the key type in a map or a hash_map for example. It is obvious that
adding comparison operators to boost::any is unnacceptable, because that
would require all value types to also have these operators defined.
Hamish,
On 24 Nov 2002 20:49:06 +, Hamish Mackenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl?BoostSocket/SocketErrorConcept
[snip]
A write on an ssl stream can
block attempting to read from the underlying socket (and vice-versa).
Not sure
John Maddock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
040701c292ee$84b01840$c43487d9@1016031671">news:040701c292ee$84b01840$c43487d9@1016031671...
Alexei,
Looks like we're all thinking alike, a while ago I put together a sequence
based substring class that could act as a universal wrapper for any
Remy Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I'm really only at the very beginning of this project, so I'm currently
searching for information and previous work on the subject. Boost.Python
seemed to already provide lots of functionality in this
Alexander Nasonov wrote:
You can create your own framework for dynamic_any using
dynamic_any::function. In a combination with simple and typesafe interface
it could make great library. Basic idea is here:
namespace your_framework
{
// ...
namespace detail
{
// ...
struct
Hu Xinwei wrote:
- How to interupt a thread waiting on some socket event
(synchronous and asynchronous) from another thread?
IMHO, I dont think such a mechanism is needed.
A typical example: You have a thread that implements a synchronous
listener like this:
bind();
listen();
while
Pavol,
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002 10:12:36 +0100, Pavol Droba [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there an interest to support also non-TCP/IP based protocols like
IRDA/TP or raw sockets?
I think this should be feasable, though I know nothing of IRDA/TP.
Is it just a case of using the appropriate
Hamish,
On 24 Nov 2002 23:23:27 +, Hamish Mackenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is_set - count (I'm not fussed about this one)
Not sure about count, how about something like active
Yes, or contains?
or find. Having looked at set maybe count is better, but that suggests an
integer return
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
[...]
Well I hope that was all instructive, but it was probably way more
complicated than neccessary. I think it would actually be far superior
to build a solution around an mpl iterator adaptor like
Sorry to not jump back into this thread sooner - there is too much traffic
on boost for me to keep track.
I'm going to be spending my time in early December primarily focusing on
boost licensing issues and have a IP lawyer within Adobe assisting me.
I've been through this numerous times with
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 04:52:35PM +0100, Terje Sletteb? wrote:
From: Pavol Droba [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 02:47:54PM +0100, Terje Sletteb? wrote:
How did you do it on the ARM? As I understand, it requires
word-alignment
for words (and half-word alignment for
Hu Xinwei wrote:
It is surprisingly difficult to portably tell this thread that it
should terminat itself.
Well, the portable method I know is like this:
listen thread:
for (;;) {
fd = accept();
if(server_should_shutdown) {
//do something here then exit
}
//process fd here
}
While ago John Panzer proposed function test_strict_weak_ordering
I modified it for use with Boost.Test (look here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/test_strict_weak_ordering/BTL_comp
atible/runtime_concept_check.hpp)
I was thinking about adding it to Boost.Test. Will you find it
On 11/25/02 10:06 AM, Peter Dimov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing missing from intrusive_ptr as implemented in 1.29 is the ability
to avoid the add_ref at construction time.
There are a number of APIs using refcounted opaque types (Apple in
particular is fond of them) in which a function
Sean Parent [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sorry to not jump back into this thread sooner - there is too much traffic
on boost for me to keep track.
I'm going to be spending my time in early December primarily focusing on
boost licensing issues and have a IP lawyer within Adobe assisting me.
So should we use
Copyright (c), 2002, A N Author
to cover as many countries/lawyers as possible?
But do we need to update the year for each release (perhaps twice a year?)?
What significance does the year have?
Paul
Paul A Bristow, Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria, LA8 8AB UK
+44 1539
Your are asking why can't the constructor be not explicit, right?
Well, this would allow the 'direct' syntax fn(1,3) that
Vincent wanted,
but...
It would entirely break the pointer semantics because the
following would be
allowed:
void foo()
{
optionalint opt ;
opt = 3 ;
A question about BOOST_COMPILER_VERSION:
as far as I can see from the release 1.29 files, that macro is only
defined for VC++ and Metrowerks C++. That's acceptable for me because,
I suppose, they are the only compilers where the end user version
number is not immediately obvious from the value of
So I think we should be careful to keep it simple. I think it is
interesting that in Hugo's current implementation, no library is
required. Very nice. I won't be surprised if we need a real
library at some point, but it won't be anything like the size of
ACE.
I think we should try to
Hello,
I'm trying to embedd and extend a C++ application.
I was not able to find any good examples of how to do this. From the small
tidbits of information I found, plus browsing the Boost.Python sources, I
tried the following approach (starting from the getting_started2 example,
with an added
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Markus Schöpflin
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [boost] Re: Sockets
[...]
- How do you wait for more than just socket events? Thread conditions,
window
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hamish Mackenzie
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 2:43 AM
To: Boost mailing list
Subject: RE: [boost] Re: AW: Re: AW: Sockets
[...]
I added
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 15:57, Hugo Duncan wrote:
I have attached the
implementation of file_descriptor_set I have been using in my code
recently.
Is there really any difference except in the name? The use of friend is
for select is certainly worth thinking about.
Nope, just thought it
on 11/25/02 2:13 PM, Paul A. Bristow at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So should we use
Copyright (c), 2002, A N Author
to cover as many countries/lawyers as possible?
But do we need to update the year for each release (perhaps twice a year?)?
What significance does the year have?
In our
At 03:08 PM 11/25/2002, Justus Schwartz wrote:
* Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [021125 03:26]:
The branch fs_review gives a snapshot of work-in-progress. It isn't
stable
at the moment, but progress is definitely being made. I'm hoping to get
a
lot of work done on it this coming week.
i
- Original Message -
From: Vincent Finn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:16 PM
Subject: [boost] Re: Formal Review Request: class optional
Fernando Cacciola wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Vincent Finn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And now
Hello!
I've made some suggestions on the following pages. Outlining new interfaces
for address and data_sockets concept (or data_connections as I called the
concept for now).
http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl?BoostSocket/A
ddressConcept
Separation of resolving and
From: Chris Little [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on 11/25/02 2:13 PM, Paul A. Bristow at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So should we use
Copyright (c), 2002, A N Author
to cover as many countries/lawyers as possible?
But do we need to update the year for each release (perhaps twice a
year?)?
What
- Original Message -
From: Rozental, Gennadiy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Boost mailing list' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 4:25 PM
Subject: RE: [boost] Re: Re: Formal Review Request: class optional
Your are asking why can't the constructor be not explicit, right?
[2002-11-25] Chris Little wrote:
on 11/25/02 2:13 PM, Paul A. Bristow at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So should we use
Copyright (c), 2002, A N Author
Except for the commas, as they are grammatical sugar from the copyright law
perspective.
to cover as many countries/lawyers as possible?
But
Boris and Hamish have presented examples using objects that
provide fat interfaces for event notification. By this I mean they use
seperate onEvent() handlers for each type of event as member functions
of an event sink or observer class.
ACE (I think) uses enums to register interest in
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 20:57, Boris Schäling wrote:
Looks good but am I correct in thinking it uses blocking writes to the
socket? (no on_write). This is ok for some applications but would not
work for sending large files or streaming live content.
The library uses non-blocking write. If
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
I'm trying to embedd and extend a C++ application.
I was not able to find any good examples of how to do this.
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/boost/boost/libs/python/test/embedding.cpp
From the small tidbits of information I
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hamish Mackenzie
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:53 PM
To: Boost mailing list
Subject: RE: [boost] Re: AW: Re: AW: Sockets
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 20:57, Boris Schäling wrote:
Looks good but am
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 23:34, Hugo Duncan wrote:
Hamish,
On 25 Nov 2002 17:17:41 +, Hamish Mackenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 15:43, Hugo Duncan wrote:
A write on an ssl stream can
block attempting to read from the underlying socket (and vice-versa).
At 12:57 AM 11/25/2002, Rene Rivera wrote:
Thanks, Rene.
You're welcome ;-) -- Perhaps those of us who are handy with scripts
could
help you automate some of the release procedures?
That's one of the motivations for the filesystem library. By writing the
scripts in C++, every Boost
Title: RE: [boost] Re: relative/absolute paths in filesystem library
I'm dealing with filesystem paths and urls and the way we ended up implementing it is with the following functions (we are not currently using boost::filesystem, these are from an internal library):
current_directory() -
Date: 25 Nov 2002 00:03:08 -0500
From: Jeremy Maitin-Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmmm - what I don't understand is how this would be different that calling
void basic_oarchive::write_array(void* p, size_t count)
Incidently, this would work for any kind of archive - not just the
binary ones.
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 16:28:50 +0100
From: Matthias Troyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The shared_ptr demo does not compile:
boost/shared_ptr.hpp:297: `boost::detail::shared_count
boost::shared_ptrA::pn' is private
demo_shared_ptr.cpp:183: within this context
Why do you want to access a private
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 10:41:17 +0100
From: Matthias Troyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I guess this should be changed to:
#ifdef BOOST_HAS_MS_INT64
virtual basic_iarchive operator(int64_t _Val) = 0;
virtual basic_iarchive operator(uint64_t _Val) = 0;
#endif
#ifdef
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 20:39, Robert Ramey wrote:
As mentioned in previous posts, additional functions e.g. load_array
and save_array need to be added to allow efficient serialization of large data
sets.
why can't this be handled using
basic_oarchive::write_binary(void *p, size_t
Should we consider integration with the recent xalloc postings?
(I'm just asking, I haven't looked to see is this makes sense)
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/1408266
Why would I put a request for someone else's code?
Well, you wouldn't I suppose. But the question was
Robert Ramey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 11:08:32 +0300
[...]
a) a libray gets accepted to boost.
b) some time after, someone comes up with a next great improvement
c) so he tries to convince the original author to
On Tuesday, November 26, 2002, at 03:01 AM, Robert Ramey wrote:
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 10:41:17 +0100
From: Matthias Troyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I guess this should be changed to:
#ifdef BOOST_HAS_MS_INT64
virtual basic_iarchive operator(int64_t _Val) = 0;
virtual basic_iarchive
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 04:09:29PM +, Hugo Duncan wrote:
Pavol,
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002 10:12:36 +0100, Pavol Droba [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there an interest to support also non-TCP/IP based protocols like
IRDA/TP or raw sockets?
I think this should be feasable, though I know
From: Hamish Mackenzie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I'll change the name to file_descriptor_set. The reason I had left
it
as socket_set was that I was not sure how to mix SOCKET and files
on windows - but htat looks to be easy from your code
Ah, I should have pointed out that I have
67 matches
Mail list logo
