On 21/03/2005, at 11:52 AM, d.brin wrote things:
Was I the only one who when they read the subject line, conjured up
visions of a declaration of war with that other list
Regards, Ray.
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
On 21/03/2005, at 3:23 PM, Erik Reuter wrote:
* Dan Minette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
In reletivistic quantum mechanics, this is stated as Spacelike
operators
must commute. So, going back to our example of two spin 1/2
particles in
a spin zero state, if we have call the operator for measuring
At 07:00 AM Monday 3/21/2005, Ray Ludenia wrote:
On 21/03/2005, at 11:52 AM, d.brin wrote things:
Was I the only one who when they read the subject line, conjured up
visions of a declaration of war with that other list
Yes. :)
--Ronn! :)
___
William,
On 21 Mar 2005, at 3:14 am, Nick Arnett wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 23:51:44 +, William T Goodall wrote
You don't think they're religious?
Who, the BBC???
The people in the original story who had religious objections to
evolution. You are objecting to them being referred to as
* Ray Ludenia ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hardly seems likely. Dan is from the famous shut up and calculate
school after all.
Huh? Could've fooled me.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
* Dave Land ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Actually, I thought it was pretty clear that Nick was objecting to what
he perceived as the Beeb's framing the story in the point of view of
the (literalist Christian) religious types who were reportedly
objecting to the films in question. The
Great stuff at: http://www.newscientist.com/channel/space/mg18524911.600
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
- Original Message -
From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 12:22 PM
Subject: Re: Imax 'shuns films on evolution'
* Dave Land ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Actually, I thought it was pretty clear that Nick was
Ray said:
Was I the only one who when they read the subject line, conjured up
visions of a declaration of war with that other list
Didn't we already win that one?
Rich
GSV Deliberately Ambiguous
___
11 The Wow signal
I thought this was later refuted as being the signal from a Pulsar, which
had previously been unknown?
Damon.
Damon Agretto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
* Dan Minette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Not really. The concept that we should not use the bible as a means of
understanding nature predates science (as opposed to natural philosophy)
by hundreds of years. It was not presented by just any theorist either:...
rather it was Tommy
- Original Message -
From: Richard Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 12:44 PM
Subject: Re: an item from the culture war front
Ray said:
Was I the only one who when they read the subject line, conjured up
visions of a
After a decade spent exploring his Uplift Saga (with brief detours for The
Postman and his contribution to the Second Foundation prequel trilogy,
Foundation's Triumph), David Brin has written another stellar entry in
original, thought-provoking science fiction.
...
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 03:26:18 +, William T Goodall wrote
The people in the original story who had religious objections to
evolution. You are objecting to them being referred to as religious.
Are you claiming they are not religious or what?
Confusion reigns. I'm not disagreeing that
- Original Message -
From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: Imax 'shuns films on evolution'
* Dan Minette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Not really. The concept that we should not use the bible
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:01:27 -0600, Dan Minette
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He couldn't be arrested for countering Aristotle, so they used scripture.
But, if the earth orbiting the sun were really a theological problem, then
why in the world would Pope Gregory have consulted a number of Copernican
- Original Message -
From: Maru Dubshinki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: Imax 'shuns films on evolution'
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:01:27 -0600, Dan Minette
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He couldn't be
* Dan Minette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Out of curiosity, why are you so certain that the pop history must be
right?
Out of curiosity, Dan, have you stopped beating your wife?
You really are pathetic when it comes to discussions on religion. All
of your normal sharpness goes out the window.
Erik Reuter wrote:
* Dan Minette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Out of curiosity, why are you so certain that the pop history must
be
right?
Out of curiosity, Dan, have you stopped beating your wife?
You really are pathetic when it comes to discussions on religion.
All
of your normal
On 21 Mar 2005, at 8:51 pm, Nick Arnett wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 03:26:18 +, William T Goodall wrote
The people in the original story who had religious objections to
evolution. You are objecting to them being referred to as religious.
Are you claiming they are not religious or what?
On Monday 2005-03-21 17:11, William T Goodall wrote:
On 21 Mar 2005, at 8:51 pm, Nick Arnett wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 03:26:18 +, William T Goodall wrote
The people in the original story who had religious objections to
evolution. You are objecting to them being referred to as
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/03/22/
wrelig22.xml
http://tinyurl.com/5jj5n
Religious belief is in the genes and can literally be inherited from
one's parents, according to new research.
While environmental factors were the largest influences on children,
genetic
At 07:24 PM Monday 3/21/2005, William T Goodall wrote:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/03/22/ wrelig22.xml
http://tinyurl.com/5jj5n
Religious belief is in the genes and can literally be inherited from
one's parents, according to new research.
While environmental factors
.
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
:)
Nothing Else To Add Maru
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
On 22 Mar 2005, at 2:44 am, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
:)
Nothing Else To Add Maru
But it isn't symmetrical. Colour-blindness or perfect pitch are also
genetically linked attributes that correlate to objective reality.
Colour-blindness is a defect. Perfect pitch may be an advantage (or
maybe not
On Mar 21, 2005, at 7:09 PM, William T Goodall wrote:
Susceptibility to believing Evil religious nonsense that isn't so is a
defect.
How long, d'ya suppose, before someone discovers that arguing from
one's conclusions is genetically determined?
Dave
On 22 Mar 2005, at 3:11 am, Dave Land wrote:
On Mar 21, 2005, at 7:09 PM, William T Goodall wrote:
Susceptibility to believing Evil religious nonsense that isn't so is
a defect.
How long, d'ya suppose, before someone discovers that arguing from
one's conclusions is genetically determined?
Was it
Dave Land wrote:
On Mar 21, 2005, at 7:09 PM, William T Goodall wrote:
Susceptibility to believing Evil religious nonsense that isn't so is a
defect.
How long, d'ya suppose, before someone discovers that arguing from one's
conclusions is genetically determined?
Eh, I think it's purely
Some of you may enjoy the following:
http://www.thepaincomics.com/weekly041229.htm
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
I don't know if this is for real. Oughta be.
An upcoming* Scientific America editorial:
There's no easy way to admit this. For years, helpful letter
writers told us to stick to science. They pointed out that science
and politics don't mix. They said we should be more balanced in our
In a message dated 3/21/2005 9:41:16 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Some of you may enjoy the following:
http://www.thepaincomics.com/weekly041229.htm
Science and Norse Mythology combined:
We all evolved from Edda Haskel, who certainly always behaved like an
I noticed that the bulk of these quandries are comological in nature.
Perhaps cosmologists should shut up and calculate?
--
Doug
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
At 05:26 PM 21/03/05 -0800, you wrote:
I don't know if this is for real. Oughta be.
I think the next to last line telegraphs what you can expect.
Keith Henson
An upcoming* Scientific America editorial:
There's no easy way to admit this. For years, helpful letter writers
told us to stick to
34 matches
Mail list logo
