On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Trent Shipley wrote:
> Google? Bing? I don't care.
>
So Bing doesn't stand for "But It's Not Google?"
Seriously, however... I'm working on a project that involves using several
different search engines, via their APIs, and aggregating results. This is
a fairly
On Nov 25, 2009, at 3:57 AM, Trent Shipley wrote:
> Google? Bing? I don't care.
Neither do I, which makes me wonder why you bothered to write anything else.
--
Warren Ockrassa | @waxis
Blog | http://indigestible.nightwares.com/
Books | http://books.nightwares.com/
Web | http://www.nightwares
http://bingle.nu/
___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
On 25/11/2009, at 11:05 PM, Trent Shipley wrote:
> Charlie Bell wrote:
>
>> On 25/11/2009, at 9:57 PM, Trent Shipley wrote:
>>
>>> It would take time to wean myself off Microsoft even if someone
>>> made an desktop operating system that was twice as good.
>>>
>>
>> There is. I did.
>>
> I h
Charlie Bell wrote:
> On 25/11/2009, at 9:57 PM, Trent Shipley wrote:
>
>> It would take time to wean myself off Microsoft even if someone
>> made an desktop operating system that was twice as good.
>>
>
> There is. I did.
>
> Except for gaming. So I use a MacBook for day-to-day shite, e
On 25/11/2009, at 9:57 PM, Trent Shipley wrote:
>
> It would take time to wean myself off Microsoft even if someone
> made an desktop operating system that was twice as good.
There is. I did.
Except for gaming. So I use a MacBook for day-to-day shite, email, letters,
browsing, whatever, and
Google? Bing? I don't care.
Not long ago if I was given an MSN or Yahoo search tool I went out of my
way to get to a Google search. Not any more. The competition has come
a long way.
That's BAD news for Google. I like Google as a corporate citizen, but
they are still a one trick pony. If s
