On 19 Oct 2008 at 19:07, Nick Arnett wrote:
I'll stop feeding him now and perhaps ponder just how much disruption the
list managers should tolerate. A lot, of course, but sheesh...
Said it before, say it again: You're far too forgiving.
On forum / list / wiki moderation, I fall into the
On Oct 21, 2008, at 5:20 AM, Andrew Crystall wrote:
On 19 Oct 2008 at 19:07, Nick Arnett wrote:
I'll stop feeding him now and perhaps ponder just how much
disruption the
list managers should tolerate. A lot, of course, but sheesh...
Said it before, say it again: You're far too
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Dave Land wrote:
On Oct 21, 2008, at 5:20 AM, Andrew Crystall wrote:
On 19 Oct 2008 at 19:07, Nick Arnett wrote:
I'll stop feeding him now and perhaps ponder just how much
disruption the
list managers should tolerate. A lot, of course, but sheesh...
Said it
On 21 Oct 2008 at 7:48, Dave Land wrote:
On Oct 21, 2008, at 5:20 AM, Andrew Crystall wrote:
On 19 Oct 2008 at 19:07, Nick Arnett wrote:
I'll stop feeding him now and perhaps ponder just how much
disruption the
list managers should tolerate. A lot, of course, but sheesh...
On 20/10/2008, at 9:59 PM, William T Goodall wrote:
Do you think it is reasonable that someone should participate in a
discussion they are also moderating?
In a public forum or in a democracy, no.
But this is a private forum, on a private server. It's entirely
reasonable for the host to
Charlie said:
But this is a private forum, on a private server. It's entirely
reasonable for the host to both partake in the conversation and to
express displeasure at behaviour deemed disruptive.
And, of course, anyone who's unhappy with the situation can fairly
easily set up a third
On 20 Oct 2008, at 05:38, Doug Pensinger wrote:
William wrote:
I really don't think you are fit to be list manager. You should do
the
decent thing and quit.
Are you volunteering your time and equipment?
I could get it set up in a few days if necessary.
Not yet Maru
--
William T
William T Goodall said the following on 10/20/2008 6:59 AM:
Do you think it is reasonable that someone should participate in a
discussion they are also moderating?
Absolutely.
--[Lance]
--
GPG Fingerprint: 409B A409 A38D 92BF 15D9 6EEE 9A82 F2AC 69AC 07B9
CACert.org Assurer
On 20 Oct 2008, at 13:56, Lance A. Brown wrote:
William T Goodall said the following on 10/20/2008 6:59 AM:
Do you think it is reasonable that someone should participate in a
discussion they are also moderating?
Absolutely.
Why?
Rationale Maru
--
William T Goodall
Mail : [EMAIL
William T Goodall said the following on 10/20/2008 9:03 AM:
On 20 Oct 2008, at 13:56, Lance A. Brown wrote:
William T Goodall said the following on 10/20/2008 6:59 AM:
Do you think it is reasonable that someone should participate in a
discussion they are also moderating?
Absolutely.
At 08:03 AM Monday 10/20/2008, William T Goodall wrote:
On 20 Oct 2008, at 13:56, Lance A. Brown wrote:
William T Goodall said the following on 10/20/2008 6:59 AM:
Do you think it is reasonable that someone should participate in a
discussion they are also moderating?
Absolutely.
On 20 Oct 2008, at 14:08, Lance A. Brown wrote:
As Mr. Bell said: This is a private list on a private server. It
is as
if we were all invited to a never-ending coffee at Dr. Brin's house.
Dr. Brin drops in occasionally and his appointed host includes himself
in the conversation while
On 20 Oct 2008, at 05:35, Charlie Bell wrote:
On 20/10/2008, at 1:12 PM, William T Goodall wrote:
On 20 Oct 2008, at 03:07, Nick Arnett wrote:
I'll stop feeding him now and perhaps ponder just how much
disruption the
list managers should tolerate. A lot, of course, but sheesh...
I
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 6:56 PM, William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Of course you prefer not be shown to be wrong. I think it's very clear
to any reasonable person that I am right. Your blustering and
posturing isn't going to convince anyone otherwise.
My apologies to all for feeding
On 20 Oct 2008, at 03:07, Nick Arnett wrote:
I'll stop feeding him now and perhaps ponder just how much
disruption the
list managers should tolerate. A lot, of course, but sheesh...
I really don't think you are fit to be list manager. You should do the
decent thing and quit.
Advice
At 09:12 PM Sunday 10/19/2008, William T Goodall wrote:
On 20 Oct 2008, at 03:07, Nick Arnett wrote:
I'll stop feeding him now and perhaps ponder just how much
disruption the
list managers should tolerate. A lot, of course, but sheesh...
I really don't think you are fit to be list
On 20/10/2008, at 1:12 PM, William T Goodall wrote:
On 20 Oct 2008, at 03:07, Nick Arnett wrote:
I'll stop feeding him now and perhaps ponder just how much
disruption the
list managers should tolerate. A lot, of course, but sheesh...
I really don't think you are fit to be list
William wrote:
I really don't think you are fit to be list manager. You should do the
decent thing and quit.
Are you volunteering your time and equipment?
Doug
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Nick wrote:
I'll stop feeding him now and perhaps ponder just how much disruption the
list managers should tolerate. A lot, of course, but sheesh...
Excellent idea. There is as much or even more disruption in the
tumultuous replies than there were in the original messages.
Doug
Just roll
19 matches
Mail list logo
