Kevin Tarr wrote:
Okay, again I see all of that. But I'm assuming (and keep in mind I'm
completely inebriated right now) that the Cal people agreed with a certain
plan, then when things got tight, they wanted to change the plan. I'm not
saying that business profits should trump all, but that
At 01:38 AM 7/25/2003 -0400 Jon Gabriel wrote:
Then again, CA
Dems aren't coming across as geniuses in general these days. Did you
see the report yesterday about the CA state legislators (Dems again) who
were caught on tape suggesting that the state's fiscal crisis be
extended over time for
At 07:51 AM 7/25/2003 -0700, you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of pencimen
...
Enron _and_ the Bush administration.
Or is that what you meant?
Sort of. Except that there's some superset that they're both part of, which
I dare not
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of Kevin Tarr
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 1:40 PM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: RE: Gray Davis Recall Election Set for Sep-Oct
At 02:13 PM 7/26/2003 -0400, you wrote:
At 01:38 AM 7/25/2003 -0400 Jon Gabriel wrote
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:brin-l-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Tarr
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 1:49 PM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: RE: Gray Davis Recall Election Set for Sep-Oct
At 07:51 AM 7/25/2003 -0700, you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
A more accurate assessment seems to be that Enron used exorbitant,
unfair fees to blackmail California consumers and threatened to withhold
power if they weren't paid.
From an article in the SF Chronicle, quoted on corpwatch.org:
http://www.corpwatch.org/news/PND.jsp?articleid=2530
Jon
Right,
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of Kevin Tarr
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 4:26 PM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: RE: Gray Davis Recall Election Set for Sep-Oct
A more accurate assessment seems to be that Enron used exorbitant,
unfair fees to blackmail
At 07:51 AM 7/25/03 -0700, Nick Arnett wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of pencimen
...
Enron _and_ the Bush administration.
Or is that what you meant?
Sort of. Except that there's some superset that they're both part of, which
I
Jon Gabriel wrote:
No, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission under the Bush
administration tried to stop California from fighting Enron with price
caps and we can safely assume that this was in part because Enron was
lobbying the Bush administration to do so as reported in AP:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of Doug Pensinger
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 9:16 PM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: Gray Davis Recall Election Set for Sep-Oct
Jon Gabriel wrote:
No, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission under the Bush
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 07:51 AM 7/25/03 -0700, Nick Arnett wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of pencimen
...
Enron _and_ the Bush administration.
Or is that what you meant?
Sort of. Except that there's some superset that
Jon Gabriel wrote:
the Bush administration recruited something like a dozen Enron
employees for top-mid level positions so it isn't as if these people
were strangers to one another.
However to play devil's advocate, the administration could have bailed
Enron out and opted not to do so. Just
At 05:10 PM 7/27/2003 -0400, you wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of Kevin Tarr
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 4:26 PM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: RE: Gray Davis Recall Election Set for Sep-Oct
A more accurate assessment seems to be that Enron used
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Ronn!Blankenship
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 3:20 PM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: RE: Gray Davis Recall Election Set for Sep-Oct
At 07:51 AM 7/25/03 -0700, Nick Arnett wrote:
-Original
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Horn, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: John D. Giorgis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Of course, California Democrats, instead of doing the wise
thing and trying
to get a solid candidate in there are rallying around the
sinking ship.
You mean, like the
Jon Gabriel wrote:
It certainly looks to me like he's screwed and that the Democrats are
(rather stupidly, imo) pinning all their hopes on him. Then again, CA
Dems aren't coming across as geniuses in general these days. Did you
see the report yesterday about the CA state legislators
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of John D. Giorgis
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 8:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Gray Davis Recall Election Set for Sep-Oct
Not
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of pencimen
...
Enron _and_ the Bush administration.
Or is that what you meant?
Sort of. Except that there's some superset that they're both part of, which
I dare not name. ;-)
Nick
From: John D. Giorgis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Of course, California Democrats, instead of doing the wise
thing and trying
to get a solid candidate in there are rallying around the
sinking ship.
You mean, like the Terminator?
- jmh
___
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of John D. Giorgis
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 8:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Gray Davis Recall Election Set for Sep-Oct
Not sure if it's so clear to those of you who don't live here, but a lot of
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of John D. Giorgis
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Gray Davis Recall Election Set for Sep-Oct
This is certainly one of the most amazing stories of the year - the
Governor of mighty California
21 matches
Mail list logo
