RE: Restricting, not: culling the species

2008-06-13 Thread Deborah Harrell
Late - better than never, no? Snippage throughout. I *think* I've got who said what correct... On Tue, 5/20/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Best-case scenario for

RE: Restricting, not: culling the species

2008-06-13 Thread Pat Mathews
Deborah Harrell says: I think we ought to have adaptation classes for those unfamiliar with our ideal values. I totally agree. Enrollees will include a good many people who think that granting habeas corpus to accesed enemies of the State means we will all be murdered in our beds; those who

RE: Restricting, not: culling the species

2008-06-13 Thread Pat Mathews
One more answer to Debbi - this time about GreenTechnology - as I sit here in my midcentury box in the desert with the swamp cooler running - people used to build for the climate. There once was a huge body of knowledge about how to do so. No high tech required; just the good services of an

RE: Restricting, not: culling the species

2008-06-13 Thread Deborah Harrell
On Fri, 6/13/08, Pat Mathews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Deborah Harrell says: I think we ought to have adaptation classes for those unfamiliar with our ideal values. I totally agree. Enrollees will include a good many people who think that granting habeas corpus to accesed enemies of the

RE: Restricting, not: culling the species

2008-06-13 Thread Deborah Harrell
On Fri, 6/13/08, Pat Mathews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One more answer to Debbi - this time about GreenTechnology - as I sit here in my midcentury box in the desert with the swamp cooler running - people used to build for the climate. There once was a huge body of knowledge about how to do