On Nov 6, 2004, at 9:51 AM, Dan Minette wrote:
I'll fully agree with you on one point: our different opinions
concerning
Bush will be subject to experimental verificationso I can see
your
reluctance to spend time on speculation.
Gosh, you both sound like guys whose lives aren't on the line,
On Nov 5, 2004, at 10:33 PM, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
--- Warren Ockrassa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ask you who's being really conservative when
peaceniks insist that
détente is almost always preferable while hawks
scream for gore and
ivory towerians pontificate about verification and
- Original Message -
From: Warren Ockrassa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2004 12:14 AM
Subject: Re: Bush II
I'll fully agree with you on one point: our different opinions
concerning
Bush will be subject to experimental
- Original Message -
From: JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 8:14 PM
Subject: Bush II Re: The Magic Ingredient?
Well, I won't debate this at length because we certainly shall see.I
am
personally not one to believe
On Nov 5, 2004, at 10:20 PM, Dan Minette wrote:
From: JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, I won't debate this at length because we certainly shall see.
I
am
personally not one to believe that people who otherwise seem quite
intelligent are actually phenomenally stupid. (Please no stupid
partisan
--- Warren Ockrassa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ask you who's being really conservative when
peaceniks insist that
détente is almost always preferable while hawks
scream for gore and
ivory towerians pontificate about verification and
eventualities.**
Well, the conservative one is probably
On Nov 5, 2004, at 11:33 PM, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
--- Warren Ockrassa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ask you who's being really conservative when
peaceniks insist that
détente is almost always preferable while hawks
scream for gore and
ivory towerians pontificate about verification and
--- Warren Ockrassa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At any cost.
You know as well as I do that the draft is coming
back.
No, actually, I know far better than you do that it
isn't. That's nonsense. It's not coming back. MIT
is the home of American Security Studies, and there
isn't a single
On Nov 6, 2004, at 12:04 AM, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
--- Warren Ockrassa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At any cost.
You know as well as I do that the draft is coming
back.
No, actually, I know far better than you do that it
isn't. That's nonsense. It's not coming back.
Wow, way to prove your point.