Jan Coffey wrote:
Look in at the members page, I'm the guy hovering over Greg Benford ;-)
Seems I was so thrilled to meet him I followed him around like a puppy asking
silly questions just to be communicating with the man.
GB was a most impressive guest of honour at Aussiecon a few years ago.
--- Ray Ludenia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jan Coffey wrote:
Look in at the members page, I'm the guy hovering over Greg Benford ;-)
Seems I was so thrilled to meet him I followed him around like a puppy
asking
silly questions just to be communicating with the man.
GB was a most
--- The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Jan Coffey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Andrew Crystall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29 May 2003 at 15:25, The Fool wrote:
From: Jan Coffey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Opinions: http://www.newamericancentury.org/
???
Fascist
At 12:31 AM 5/30/03 -0700, Jan Coffey wrote:
--- Andrew Crystall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29 May 2003 at 15:25, The Fool wrote:
From: Jan Coffey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Opinions: http://www.newamericancentury.org/
???
Fascist power behind the throne of dictator Bush.
Top
Ronn! wrote:
FWIW, the informal consensus that seems to have developed here over the
years is (1) snip all the irrelevant portions of the post you are replying
to and (2) reply at the bottom.
...which is kind of strange. I typically see snipping and bottom-posting on
Usenet and in most e-mail
At 12:06 PM 5/30/03 -0500, Reggie Bautista wrote:
Ronn! wrote:
FWIW, the informal consensus that seems to have developed here over the
years is (1) snip all the irrelevant portions of the post you are
replying to and (2) reply at the bottom.
...which is kind of strange. I typically see snipping
From: Reggie Bautista [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ronn! wrote:
FWIW, the informal consensus that seems to have developed here over the
years is (1) snip all the irrelevant portions of the post you are replying
to and (2) reply at the bottom.
...which is kind of strange. I typically see snipping and
Bryon Daly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
As I took it, the main topic of concern was the proposed denial of
access to space spy/intelligence technology, even for US allies. I
came across to me almost as The US will forbid all other countries to
have any spy/intelligence satellites.
--- Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And welcome to the list! (I don't think I have seen your name here until
recently, so I'm guessing that either you recently subscribed or recently
came out of lurkdom: If I'm wrong, well, I've been wrong about other
things, so simply disregard
At 01:21 PM 5/30/2003 -0400, you wrote:
From: Reggie Bautista [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ronn! wrote:
FWIW, the informal consensus that seems to have developed here over the
years is (1) snip all the irrelevant portions of the post you are
replying to and (2) reply at the bottom.
...which is kind of
... at every corporate job I've worked (and I worked quite a few as a
temp), you never snip anything from an email and you always reply at
the top.
Which means either that the corporate people who send you email have
not bothered to read and consider the original message or they feel
--- Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And welcome to the list! (I don't think I have seen your
name here until
recently, so I'm guessing that either you recently
subscribed or recently
came out of lurkdom: If I'm wrong, well, I've been wrong
about other
things, so simply
In a message dated 5/30/2003 12:39:54 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Very into Action Sports (Snowboarding Kiteboarding mostly),
Think about which sports are safe for the Hoon, and which are not.
A hoon with a baseball bat would take the head off of a human pitcher.
Ronn! wrote:
FWIW, the informal consensus that seems to have developed here over the
years is (1) snip all the irrelevant portions of the post you are
replying to and (2) reply at the bottom.
I replied:
...which is kind of strange. I typically see snipping and bottom-posting
on Usenet and in
--- Reggie Bautista [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This used to bug me a lot, since it makes communications less
clear
of what exactly they are replying to, but I've given up on worrying about
it.
The rationale was that they wanted each email to contain a
complete archive of the discussion up
At 09:50 PM 5/29/2003 + Robert J. Chassell wrote:
Why are new reporters just now paying attention to a U.S. 'negation'
policy in space that has been around for two generations? And why
are they paying attention to the ability
I would hardly call this one link reporters just now paying
From: Jan Coffey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Andrew Crystall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29 May 2003 at 15:25, The Fool wrote:
From: Jan Coffey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Opinions: http://www.newamericancentury.org/
???
Fascist power behind the throne of dictator Bush.
Top
You will be assimilated!
The US has every intention of deploying weapons in space, ultimately in order to
control access to the atmosphere and outer space, and to be able to hit land and
sea-based targets anytime, anywhere. Less need for messy and time-consuming
troop deployments, which arouse
Opinions: http://www.newamericancentury.org/
???
--- Han Tacoma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You will be assimilated!
The US has every intention of deploying weapons in space, ultimately in
order to
control access to the atmosphere and outer space, and to be able to hit
land and
sea-based
From: Jan Coffey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Opinions: http://www.newamericancentury.org/
???
Fascist power behind the throne of dictator Bush.
Top Posting is BAAD.
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
The US has every intention of deploying weapons in space, ...
What is interesting is not this statement, but that it has been more
than 40 years since the US first tested a nuclear weapon in space.
Why are new reporters just now paying attention to a U.S. 'negation'
policy in space that has
You don't have to be a space opera science fiction reader to have
heard about space warfare or space-to-planet bombardment ... or do
you?
Let me add Jerry Pournelle's idea of a THOR space defense system summarized
below http://www.jerrypournelle.com/slowchange/mega.html (I have mentioned
At 06:21 PM 5/29/03 -0400, Bryon Daly wrote:
From: Robert J. Chassell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The US has every intention of deploying weapons in space, ...
What is interesting is not this statement, but that it has been more
than 40 years since the US first tested a nuclear weapon in space.
Why
Doh! I accidentally hit the send button mid-post!
From: Robert J. Chassell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The US has every intention of deploying weapons in space, ...
What is interesting is not this statement, but that it has been more
than 40 years since the US first tested a nuclear weapon in space.
What's the difference between a ballistic space-based weapon and a spy
satellite? A spy satellite weighs and costs more...
Nerd From Hell
-Original Message-
From: Bryon Daly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 3:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The Borg
--- Andrew Crystall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29 May 2003 at 15:25, The Fool wrote:
From: Jan Coffey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Opinions: http://www.newamericancentury.org/
???
Fascist power behind the throne of dictator Bush.
Top Posting is BAAD.
Since when did this turn
26 matches
Mail list logo
