JDG wrote:
You have stated that you believe the VFW is Constitutionall prohibited
because it is, quote, exclusionary and offensive.
I don't believe I ever said anything about the VFW except that their
involvement in this argument is irrelevant. By allowing the religious
symbol to remain
From: Dan Minette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I haven't noticed any changes toward right dictatorships
under Bush 1
and Bush 2 except for turning against the former US supported
creations that went too far - Noriega and Saddam.
Why don't the data convince you? Are you arguing
At 09:02 PM 6/15/04 -, iaamoac wrote:
Slate's most excellent Dahlia Lithwick had a great article yesterday
explaining why in fact that US Supreme Court decision was not ducking
the issue, but in fact made the correct decision:
http://slate.msn.com/id/2102381/
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:39:15 -0500, Dan Minette
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Gary Denton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 12:03 PM
Subject: Re: Request for Proposals
snip
Panama is better, the family of
From: iaamoac [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, I happen to know that there are a number of critiques of Bush's
foreign policy on this List. Thus, I thought that it would be
interesting to solicit recommendations for what to do about Iran
here. I look forward to your thoughts.
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:27:21 -0700 (PDT), Deborah Harrell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...and I didn't have to do a thing! Yahoo just
upgraded my account from 4-100MB storage. Wonder if
they're competing with Gmail (is that correct?)
recently launched.
Oh, dear...you know that phrase about
At 02:52 PM 6/15/04 -0700, Deborah Harrell wrote:
http://science.nasa.gov/spaceweather/venustransit/gallery_08jun04_page9.htm
http://makeashorterlink.com/?X17162398
Every 17 years, a dozen states from Delaware to
Illinois are treated to a springtime emergence of the
Brood X (Magicicada
From: Ronn!Blankenship [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
I'm surprised that I haven't heard more from the nutball
contingent about this portending the end of the world (like
apparently everything else does) . . .
-- Ronn! ;-)
(I am having e-mail problems this weekend.)
See,
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 21:35:54 -0500, The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Iran is _*Already*_ Massing troops on the Iraq border for just that:
According to GOP Moonie Propagandist Newspaper / UPI:
http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20040615-055649-4707r.htm
Iran massing troops on Iraq
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 07:11:56PM +1000, Andrew Paul wrote:
but then I am not Iranian. If I was, I would probably think it was a
damn fine idea, and do my best to make it happen cos, as North Korea
seems to demonstrate, once you have them, then the Big Bad Yankees
leave you alone.
Perhaps
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 19:30:10 +1000, Andrew Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Ronn!Blankenship [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
I'm surprised that I haven't heard more from the nutball
contingent about this portending the end of the world (like
apparently everything else does) . .
AP - A poll of Iraqis commissioned by the U.S.-governing authority has
provided the Bush administration a stark picture of anti-American
sentiment - more than half of Iraqis believe they would be safer if
U.S. troops simply left.
The poll, commissioned by the Coalition Provisional Authority last
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 06:13:09 -0400, Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 07:11:56PM +1000, Andrew Paul wrote:
but then I am not Iranian. If I was, I would probably think it was a
damn fine idea, and do my best to make it happen cos, as North Korea
seems to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tytlal designed test
Trying to give clearer statements:
OK... I'm thinking of using this as a test at the Rousit Uplift Ceremony:
-
You are a Rousit in a party of ten Rousits.
Since you can't speak, the tytlal are going to work on an equal level and
only
At 01:22 AM 6/16/2004 -0400 JDG wrote:
At 11:17 AM 6/15/2004 -0500 Gary Denton wrote:
I don't know, I am a couple miles from a petrochemical plant and never
think about terrorists attacking it.
Then again, you've probably never watched an airplane crash into an office
building ten miles away from
In a message dated 6/16/2004 4:49:09 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why not Hands can not touch the cream nor a band from the rim of the
pie to the middle. And Cream may not touch table or ground.
And that 100 percent of the cream from two of the pies must make it
This is an old article, but it was still absolutely fascinating.
http://slate.msn.com/id/2060825
This article was reprinted because the (cough, cough) 9/11 Commission
has also concluded that NORAD dropped the ball on 9/11.
JDG
___
JDG wrote:
At 09:36 PM 6/15/2004 -0700 Doug Pensinger wrote:
Because it is on U.S. Government property it isn't the VFW's speech that
is in question. Because it is on U.S. government property is the U.S.
Government's speech. The VFW doesn't figure at all in the decision, their
involvement
- Original Message -
From: JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 12:17 AM
Subject: Re: Memorial Ruled Unconstitutional
At 12:09 AM 6/16/2004 -0500 Dan Minette wrote:
The VFW often burns flags John. :-)
You caught me!
Doug said:
Eliasberg scoffed at the government's argument that the site is a
war memorial. That doesn't honor Muslim veterans, Jewish
veterans, atheist veterans or agnostic veterans, Eliasberg said.
It's a preeminent symbol of a religion. If we want to have a war
memorial on federal land,
Erik said:
Perhaps if you were a stupid Iranian, you might have that opinion.
Perhaps owning nukes forces governments to grow up a bit because
countries with nuclear weapons are forced to enter the highly rational
world of mutual deterrence or else face total disaster. (They may not
have to
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 08:23:15PM +0100, Richard Baker wrote:
Erik said:
Perhaps if you were a stupid Iranian, you might have that opinion.
Perhaps owning nukes forces governments to grow up a bit because
countries with nuclear weapons are forced to enter the highly rational
world of
This is just a quick reminder that the Wednesday Brin-L chat
is scheduled for 3 PM Eastern/2 PM Central time in the US, or
7 PM Greenwich time, so it started about two hours ago. There
will probably be somebody there to talk to for at least eight
hours after the start time. See my instruction page
Julia Thompson wrote:
As far as sacrificing someone else to save my kids, I might very well.
Killing someone in defense of my children is something I would do if I
had to.
/me too, I would easily trade half of Earth - say, the useless and evil
northern hemisphere - for any of my kids. But it
JDG wrote:
At 11:45 PM 6/12/2004 -0500 Julia Thompson wrote:
JDG wrote:
At 11:02 AM 6/12/2004 -0500 Robert Seeberger wrote:
--===1385683643==
Another poll on Hannity's site was poked this week.
I'm glad to see that the list conversation persisted at a high level
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 16:51:39 -0400, Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps you are being dangerously naive and foolishly optimistic. The
leaders of are irrational and corrupt. Wishing nuclear weapons in
their hands is insanity.
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
1.
Gary Nunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Would I give up some liberties to ensure their [his
children's] safety? Absolutely.
Yet, your giving up your liberties will not protect
your family from some determined fanatic who has
decided to protest his relative insignificance on the
world's stage
iaamoac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an old article, but it was still absolutely
fascinating.
http://slate.msn.com/id/2060825
This article was reprinted because the (cough,
cough) 9/11 Commission
has also concluded that NORAD dropped the ball on
9/11.
OK, I may be just
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 04:55:21PM -0500, Gary Denton wrote:
6. A strong case could be made for another country.
Bullshit. As bad as Bush and Co. are, I'd take them over Iran's leaders
any day. It's not even close. That you would claim otherwise shows that
you are either naive or ignorant.
From: Richard Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perhaps owning nukes forces governments to grow up a bit because
countries with nuclear weapons are forced to enter the highly rational
world of mutual deterrence or else face total disaster. (They may not
have to enter into an arrangement of mutual deterrence
- Original Message -
From: Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 5:06 PM
Subject: The Holy Grail of Safety (was: Terrorism too close to home)
Debbi
who BTW waves and grins at Dan ;)
smiling and waving back
Are
From: Erik Reuter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 07:11:56PM +1000, Andrew Paul wrote:
but then I am not Iranian. If I was, I would probably think
it was a
damn fine idea, and do my best to make it happen cos, as
North Korea
seems to demonstrate, once you have
From: Deborah Harrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
iaamoac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an old article, but it was still absolutely fascinating.
http://slate.msn.com/id/2060825
This article was reprinted because the (cough,
cough) 9/11 Commission
has also concluded
- Original Message -
From: Bryon Daly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 8:29 PM
Subject: Re: Request for Proposals
From: Richard Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perhaps owning nukes forces governments to grow up a bit because
countries with nuclear
- Original Message -
From: Gary Denton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 7:29 AM
Subject: Re: Request for Proposals
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 21:35:54 -0500, The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Iran is _*Already*_ Massing troops on
mig 29 34
Moderately potent and modern aircraft. But only 34...
su 2486
Ground attack.
f-14 247
Good luck getting spares...
f-7 287
Chinese MiG-21 knock-off
f-4 472
Good luck getting spares...
f-5 197
Obsolete (unless its the CHINESE F-5 [MiG-17]
To messers. Nehemiah Dodge, Ephraim Robbins, Stephen S. Nelson, a
committee of the Danbury Baptist association in the state of Connecticut.
Gentlemen
The affectionate sentiments of esteem and approbation which you are so
good as to express towards me, on behalf of the Danbury Baptist
From a letter to Jasper Adams, president of the College of Charleston, 1832
I must admit moreover that it may not be easy, in every possible case, to
trace the line of separation between the rights of religion and the Civil
authority with such distinctness as to avoid collisions doubts on
Nick Lidster wrote:
Irans standing power is 912,569 (2004 est.) mixture of all branches,
including law enforcement. 3000 troops sure isn't a large force, but lets
not forget that they have an air force as well;
mig 29 34
su 2486
f-14 247
f-7 287
f-4 472
Andrew Paul wrote:
According to our morning news, the 9/11 commission has
conclusively established that there was no link between
Saddam and Al Qaeda. Is this what you read from it, or is
that a misquote?
What I heard regarding it was that there was no direct link between 9/11
and Iraq, but
http://www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,1239982,00.html?=rss
A brewing standards war may yet derail the progress of digital music,
or end Apple's dominance of the market. Apple finds itself - just as it
did in the PC business - offering a proprietary solution with its iPod
and iTunes
41 matches
Mail list logo
