Jim Sharkey wrote:
John D. Giorgis wrote:
NY Giants at Philadelphia - Pick: EAGLES
How about them Giants?? I can't believe they turned that around, as
they were being soundly whupped for the first 40 minutes of the game.
Though I have to wonder if it's a sign of their resiliency or the
William T Goodall wrote:
On 18 Sep 2006, at 12:43AM, Dave Land wrote:
On Sep 16, 2006, at 4:24 PM, William T Goodall wrote:
On 16 Sep 2006, at 9:12PM, Dave Land wrote:
After watching the Pyroclastic video that WTG pointed to,
Not me.
Just to clear that up Maru
Of course not. It was
On 24 Sep 2006 at 10:55, Charlie Bell wrote:
I occasionally say that evolution is a theory in much the same way
that gravity is.
How it works is a theory.
Kind of a mystery, too, which is pretty cool when you think about it.
Very cool indeed. Mysteries are what science is all
On 25/09/2006, at 9:31 AM, Andrew Crystall wrote:
On 24 Sep 2006 at 10:55, Charlie Bell wrote:
I occasionally say that evolution is a theory in much the same way
that gravity is.
How it works is a theory.
Kind of a mystery, too, which is pretty cool when you think about
it.
Very cool
On 9/23/06, Alberto Vieira Ferreira Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maru wrote:
The Wikipedia entry for R is under GNU-S :-)
I hate to play the pedantic resident Wikipedia expert here,
marudubinski, I presume :-)
You forgot the Dr.! ...(Nah, I'm kidding.)
Ok, but if we want to use
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 11:48 AM Tuesday 9/19/2006, Julia Thompson wrote:
Charlie Bell wrote:
On 08/09/2006, at 7:16 AM, Warren Ockrassa wrote:
Probably you haven't asked the right person. I base my ethical
decisions on my ability to empathize. If I know a given action would
cause me
Ritu wrote:
Julia wrote:
D. I Own more translations of the Bible than there are regulars on
this list.
Query: Can you list the translations you own? I'm just curious. A
no answer will be accepted graciously.
I was saving up qone uestion for you:
How many translations would Fool need to
In a message dated 9/22/2006 9:39:31 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That natural
selection is *part* of the mechanism is close to certain. But there's
way more to speciation - kin selection, sexual selection, allopatric/
synpatric speciation. We're discovering
Julia Thompson wrote:
Jim Sharkey wrote:
How about them Giants??
Not that I like ANYONE in the NFC East at this point (although I
will root for the Cowboys if T.O. isn't playing), but I like Eli
Manning. :)
I didn't get to see the game, but everything I read pointed to an
awful performance
On 9/24/06, Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By regulars, I think he means people who post frequently.
How frequently is frequent enough, I don't know.
So I don't know how many he means.
Julia
Well, we can find out simply by asking each poster whether they get
enough
On 25/09/2006, at 11:52 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that what Pinker meant was that natural selection explains the
presence of useful functions in creatures. All of the other
mechanisms exist for
sure but to get good and useful doohickeys one needs selection.
If he's using
11 matches
Mail list logo
