Trent Shipley wrote:
Adding a *true* indenture phase would be nice.
I think this is in agreement with the Canon. I should
be hunting for quotes now, but I'm too busy - ah,
the good old times when I had a job and _lots_ of
time to spend in my hobbies!
Then we would have
pre-uplift/claim
On Thursday 2003-12-25 05:46, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
I agree with your interpretation of GURPS Uplift. But I still think that
the indenture phase should be _another_ phase. Uplift is considered a
service that the patron does to the client, so this must be followed
by the indenture, that is
