From: Kevin Tarr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 05:58 PM 2/19/2004, you wrote:
snip
The list is tacking on an attatchment that is coming through on your
e-mails. The message at the bottom of all list posts that has the lists'
web address is 7bit encoded, whereas your email is 8bit encoded.
Kevin Tarr wrote:
At 05:58 PM 2/19/2004, you wrote:
The list is tacking on an attatchment that is coming through on your
e-mails. The message at the bottom of all list posts that has the lists'
web address is 7bit encoded, whereas your email is 8bit encoded. It's
solution is to change
snip
You are still sending it 8bit transfer-encoded and getting the list
attatchment. Not a big deal though. At least the mystery of the phantom
attatchments is solved.
Michael Harney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I did everything I could to turn that off. There is an encoding choice but
it's for
Kevin Tarr wrote:
snip
You are still sending it 8bit transfer-encoded and getting the list
attatchment. Not a big deal though. At least the mystery of the
phantom
attatchments is solved.
Michael Harney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I did everything I could to turn that off. There is an encoding
Why do some posts still have attachements? I thought the server that
relayes them strippes attachements. Kevin's post f.i. has two (see
below). One saying that his outgoing mail is virus free the other was
the added iformercial from our friendly neighbourhood server (Which
could be scrapped if
--- Kevin Tarr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Is this better? I only noticed yesterday that
outgoing e-mail is being
scanned AND certified. But it's just part of the
message, not an
attachment. I receive some mail on the subservient
list that has
attachments for no other reason than the
Kevin Tarr wrote:
At 03:52 PM 2/19/2004, you wrote:
Why do some posts still have attachements? I thought the server that
relayes them strippes attachements. Kevin's post f.i. has two (see
below). One saying that his outgoing mail is virus free the other was
the added iformercial from our
From: Kevin Tarr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 03:52 PM 2/19/2004, you wrote:
Why do some posts still have attachements? I thought the server that
relayes them strippes attachements. Kevin's post f.i. has two (see
below).
One saying that his outgoing mail is virus free the other was the added
At 05:58 PM 2/19/2004, you wrote:
From: Kevin Tarr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 03:52 PM 2/19/2004, you wrote:
Why do some posts still have attachements? I thought the server that
relayes them strippes attachements. Kevin's post f.i. has two (see
below).
One saying that his outgoing mail is virus
