David Brin wrote:
> --- Robert Seeberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> YeahCarla Faye Tucker.she got high
>> on drugs one> night.took a pickaxe.and killed two of her
>> neighbors.and> couldn't remember why
>>
>> By Texas standards, she deserved the injection.
>
> I a
David Brin wrote:
>
> My point was to point out the high school bully-style
> mockery, substituting for the decorum, sobriety and
> "gravitas" that should be shown by the leader of a
> civilization, when discussing life or death...
>
> ... or war...
>
But who elected the president of the USA to bec
--- Robert Seeberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> YeahCarla Faye Tucker.she got high
> on drugs one> night.took a pickaxe.and
killed two of her
> neighbors.and> couldn't remember why
>
> By Texas standards, she deserved the injection.
I am not arguing against this.
David Brin wrote:
> BTW, this is consistent with Bush's comment when, as
> governor of Texas, he was asked about the execution in
> Texas of a woman, Faye Tucker. He MOCKED her in a
> high, whiny voice, whimpering, "please, don't kill
> me."
>
YeahCarla Faye Tucker.she got high o
JDG wrote:
I must have missed your objections to Michael Moore's uncapped donation the
Kerry-Edwards Campaign.
Michael Moore doesn't have an FCC license -- he's not a trustee of the
public airwaves. Doesn't that make all the difference?
Nick
___
http:/
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 07:20:12 -0400, JDG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Today it's California's biggest
> >broadcaster, Pappas Telecasting, donating half a
> >million $ in free air time to Republican campaigns.
> >
> >They claim the FCC (run by Colin Powell's political
> >hack son) ruled that equal
At 12:01 PM 10/26/2004 -0700 David Brin wrote:
> Today it's California's biggest
>broadcaster, Pappas Telecasting, donating half a
>million $ in free air time to Republican campaigns.
>
>They claim the FCC (run by Colin Powell's political
>hack son) ruled that equal time isn't necessary
>because it
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:01:29 -0700 (PDT) David Brin wrote:
>--- Ruben Krasnopolsky is a perfect example of the
>sort of nit-picking conservative who I pray will step
>up and rescue the movement. Until a few weeks ago he
>was holding his nose and leaning toward Bush.
I am a nit-picking one indeed
I accept Dan's mild-mannered and reasoned rebuke.
I still resent being told that my (admittedly
dramatic) stance toward the core members of the
administration was meant by me to apply to "anyone who
disagrees" with me. And THAT most definitely was the
phrase used. There is no way on this (stil
- Original Message -
From: "David Brin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: Brin: On the Republicans
> If I responded to their intentional slander in too
> drama
--- Ruben Krasnopolsky is a perfect example of the
sort of nit-picking conservative who I pray will step
up and rescue the movement. Until a few weeks ago he
was holding his nose and leaning toward Bush. Now
he's shown the kind of flexibility that I expect from
people who can overcome a politica
For the record, all attempts by JDG and Gautam to act
the victim are simply counterfactual foolishness.
They have misrepresented me repeatedly and have flat
out attempted to portray me as calling all people who
disagree with me traitors. Since
http://www.davidbrin.com/ is replete with a myriad
On Oct 26, 2004, at 8:02 AM, Doug Pensinger wrote:
JDG wrote:
Again, the only inescapable conclusion from the above is that I,
along with the vast preponderenace of Bush voters, is a supporter of
treason.
Or, as that poll suggests, deluded - not wanting to believe in things
that are becoming mor
JDG wrote:
Again, the only inescapable conclusion from the above is that I, along
with the vast preponderenace of Bush voters, is a supporter of treason.
Or, as that poll suggests, deluded - not wanting to believe in things that
are becoming more and more obvious like the intimate relationship b
Hi David,
I think I see a minor inconsistency between two of your
recent statements. Your clarification may be useful.
*Especially* if you think I misunderstood your positions.
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 01:02:28 -0700 (PDT) you said:
>Do I really believe my theory about absolute and
>knowing treaso
At 08:15 PM 10/25/2004 -0700 David Brin wrote:
>>>The unbelievable sanctimony of claiming that one
>>>"side" favors motherhood and apple pie...
>> and claiming that the other side is composed of
>> evil, traitorous monsters?
>>
>> Just wondering...
>
>No, just lying.
>
>I have ample proof
> and claiming that the other side is composed of
> evil, traitorous monsters?
>
> Just wondering...
No, just lying.
I have ample proof that this is a slander, if by
"other side" you mean "conservatives" or
"conservative-leaving voters" or Republicans or
libertarians.
If what is meant
At 07:53 PM 10/25/2004 -0700 David Brin wrote:
>The unbelievable sanctimony of claiming that one
>"side" favors motherhood and apple pie...
and claiming that the other side is composed of evil, traitorous monsters?
Just wondering...
>By the way, look at:
>http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl
18 matches
Mail list logo
