Re: Indenture: was Notes on Uplift
Trent Shipley wrote: Adding a *true* indenture phase would be nice. I think this is in agreement with the Canon. I should be hunting for quotes now, but I'm too busy - ah, the good old times when I had a job and _lots_ of time to spend in my hobbies! Then we would have pre-uplift/claim phase minority (uplift proper, uplift stages 1-5 per GURPS Uplift 2nd ed.) indenture (payoff for minority, new request from DB SeJ, et al) maturity. That's what I think is the correct sequence of events. Would you like me to add an extra-cannonical true indenture to any future fan-fic I might write? Maybe you can keep things a little bit obscured :-) Alberto Monteiro ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Indenture: was Notes on Uplift
On Thursday 2003-12-25 05:46, Alberto Monteiro wrote: I agree with your interpretation of GURPS Uplift. But I still think that the indenture phase should be _another_ phase. Uplift is considered a service that the patron does to the client, so this must be followed by the indenture, that is way of paying back. Alberto Monteiro Adding a *true* indenture phase would be nice. Then we would have pre-uplift/claim phase minority (uplift proper, uplift stages 1-5 per GURPS Uplift 2nd ed.) indenture (payoff for minority, new request from DB SeJ, et al) maturity. Would you like me to add an extra-cannonical true indenture to any future fan-fic I might write? ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
