Re: Man wins tie sex ruling

2003-03-13 Thread Deborah Harrell
--- Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snippage I'm guessing that it means you'd better be wearing underpants, style to your choosing, unless they specifically disallow thongs or something. (And as I've never worn a thong that I found to be comfortable, I wouldn't have any concerns

Re: Man wins tie sex ruling

2003-03-12 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 01:52 PM 3/11/03 -0600, Julia Thompson wrote: Miller, Jeffrey wrote: -Original Message- From: Julia Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 08:19 AM To: Killer Bs Discussion Subject: Re: Man wins tie sex ruling William T Goodall wrote: Ties

RE: Man wins tie sex ruling

2003-03-12 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 11:30 AM 3/11/03 -0800, Miller, Jeffrey wrote: -Original Message- From: Julia Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 08:19 AM To: Killer Bs Discussion Subject: Re: Man wins tie sex ruling William T Goodall wrote: Ties are for weddings and funerals

RE: Man wins tie sex ruling

2003-03-12 Thread Jon Gabriel
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Man wins tie sex ruling Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 15:18:34 -0600 At 11:30 AM 3/11/03 -0800, Miller, Jeffrey wrote: -Original Message- From

RE: Man wins tie sex ruling

2003-03-11 Thread Miller, Jeffrey
-Original Message- From: Julia Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 08:19 AM To: Killer Bs Discussion Subject: Re: Man wins tie sex ruling William T Goodall wrote: Ties are for weddings and funerals, not for daily life. I like dress codes

Re: Man wins tie sex ruling

2003-03-11 Thread Julia Thompson
Miller, Jeffrey wrote: -Original Message- From: Julia Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 08:19 AM To: Killer Bs Discussion Subject: Re: Man wins tie sex ruling William T Goodall wrote: Ties are for weddings and funerals, not for daily

RE: Man wins tie sex ruling

2003-03-11 Thread Jon Gabriel
From: Miller, Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Man wins tie sex ruling Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 11:30:55 -0800 -Original Message- From: Julia Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent

RE: Man wins tie sex ruling

2003-03-11 Thread Miller, Jeffrey
-Original Message- From: Julia Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 11:53 AM To: Killer Bs Discussion Subject: Re: Man wins tie sex ruling Miller, Jeffrey wrote: (Of course, in the case of 2), some females might have gotten away

Re: Man wins tie sex ruling

2003-03-11 Thread Julia Thompson
Miller, Jeffrey wrote: When the anthrax scares were happening last year, our Reno, NV warehouse was evacuated and everyone exposed to the mysterious, white powder hosed down by the hazmat/firedepartment team in the parking lot. Ah. So it would be known if anyone had neglected the proper

RE: Man wins tie sex ruling

2003-03-11 Thread Kevin Tarr
William T Goodall wrote: Ties are for weddings and funerals, not for daily life. I like dress codes based on some very simple premises. Frex, the dress code based on the two following premises: 1) Nobody wants to smell anyone else's BO. 2) Nobody wants to see your underwear. (Of

RE: Man wins tie sex ruling

2003-03-11 Thread J. van Baardwijk
At 11:30 11-03-03 -0800, Jeffrey Miller wrote: Not here. We have a strict, company-wide rule that's actually printed in the Employee Handbook: Proper undergarmets must be worn at all times Ah, but does the Employee Handbook also define proper? I mean, the definition of proper undergarments as

Re: Man wins tie sex ruling

2003-03-11 Thread Julia Thompson
J. van Baardwijk wrote: At 11:30 11-03-03 -0800, Jeffrey Miller wrote: Not here. We have a strict, company-wide rule that's actually printed in the Employee Handbook: Proper undergarmets must be worn at all times Ah, but does the Employee Handbook also define proper? I mean, the

Re: Man wins tie sex ruling

2003-03-11 Thread Erik Reuter
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 05:35:27PM -0600, Julia Thompson wrote: I wonder if the policy-makers had anything in mind with respect to bras? Did you see the Seinfeld episode where Elaine was upset about the woman who never wore a bra, so Elaine gave her a bra for a present, and the woman wore the

Re: Man wins tie sex ruling

2003-03-11 Thread Julia Thompson
Erik Reuter wrote: On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 05:35:27PM -0600, Julia Thompson wrote: I wonder if the policy-makers had anything in mind with respect to bras? Did you see the Seinfeld episode where Elaine was upset about the woman who never wore a bra, so Elaine gave her a bra for a present,

Re: Man wins tie sex ruling

2003-03-11 Thread Matt Grimaldi
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 05:35:27PM -0600, Julia Thompson wrote: I wonder if the policy-makers had anything in mind with respect to bras? Erik Reuter wrote: Did you see the Seinfeld episode where Elaine was upset about the woman who never wore a bra, so Elaine gave her a bra for a