RE: Semi-OTC Lasers

2006-03-25 Thread Andrew Paul


 From: Robert G. Seeberger
 
 http://wickedlasers.com/
 
 For the last few months you have been able to buy lasers that could
 pop balloons, melt trash bags, cut electrical tape, and melt through
 plastic. It is a fairly interesting advance in materials science that
 allows consumers to do such things with an over-the-counter product.
 (Of course, you aren't going to find these at your local electronics
 stores)
 The lasers here (especially the green ones) tout some amazing
 capabilities such as being visible(the priciest model) at 120
 miles(193.12128 K)while using 3 volts of power supplied by everyday AA
 or AAA batteries that should last for 2 hours (2 metric hoursG) on a
 100% duty cycle, even if the laser itself costs $2000 (1648
 Euro/1129British pound).
 
 I expect that the price of lasers with this kind of capability will
 come down over time and that simultaneously, legislation to curb their
 availability and criminalize their misuse will occur.
 
 These kinds of lasers are somewhat dangerous toys in the hands of the
 well intentioned, but in the hands of crafty and mischievous
 malcontents.
 

Thanks for that link. I got the 75mw Phoenix and well, its fantastic.
I can see it on things several kms away, and it does look like it
bounces of the moon. It is a perfect star pointer.

Using my powers for good Maru


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Semi-OTC Lasers

2006-03-25 Thread Robert Seeberger
Andrew Paul wrote:
 From: Robert G. Seeberger

 http://wickedlasers.com/

 For the last few months you have been able to buy lasers that could
 pop balloons, melt trash bags, cut electrical tape, and melt 
 through
 plastic. It is a fairly interesting advance in materials science 
 that
 allows consumers to do such things with an over-the-counter 
 product.
 (Of course, you aren't going to find these at your local 
 electronics
 stores)
 The lasers here (especially the green ones) tout some amazing
 capabilities such as being visible(the priciest model) at 120
 miles(193.12128 K)while using 3 volts of power supplied by everyday
 AA or AAA batteries that should last for 2 hours (2 metric 
 hoursG)
 on a 100% duty cycle, even if the laser itself costs $2000 (1648
 Euro/1129British pound).

 I expect that the price of lasers with this kind of capability will
 come down over time and that simultaneously, legislation to curb
 their availability and criminalize their misuse will occur.

 These kinds of lasers are somewhat dangerous toys in the hands of 
 the
 well intentioned, but in the hands of crafty and mischievous
 malcontents.


 Thanks for that link. I got the 75mw Phoenix and well, its
 fantastic. I can see it on things several kms away, and it does look
 like it bounces of the moon. It is a perfect star pointer.

 Using my powers for good Maru

You are very welcome!G
Being all sci-fi fans means that some of us are going to be futurists 
of some stripe.
And if you are the kind of person who gets worked up about the 
future.well dammit, you just gotta have a laser!
Now that you got the biggest stick on the block, I suppose we have to 
start treating you with respect..NOT!
G


xponent
Wielders Of Coherent Beams Maru
rob 


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Semi-OTC Lasers

2006-02-27 Thread Ronn!Blankenship

At 03:29 PM Saturday 2/25/2006, Julia Thompson wrote:

Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
P.S.  It's pretty well overcast tonight.  Unlike the spotlight 
someone has going to the NE of here, my pointer will not reach far 
enough to put a visible spot on the clouds.  It will suffice, 
however, to mark any branch on any tree visible from here.


How far will it get through thick fog?  I mean the sort of fog that 
makes you wish you hand't had a meeting away from home that evening 
because you're crawling along at 15 mph because if you go much 
faster, you might not see the edge of the road before you start to 
go off, and you're taking the turns around 5 to make sure you don't 
end up in one of the deep ditches on either side of the road you're 
turning on to.


Julia

who had a meeting Tuesday evening and came home through some really 
nasty fog, and who really, really wishes the county had sprung for 
paint on one road in particular



I'd be interested in the answer to that question, too, but afaik we 
haven't had any thick fog like that since I got it, unless perhaps 
there was an occasion when it formed and dissipated while I was 
asleep and I never even looked out the window and saw it.  I think 
there might have been a bit of light haze once or twice, but nothing 
you couldn't easily see through and just noticed because of the 
effect it had on street lights or distant trees.  No fires with thick 
smoke, either. (Thankfully.)  I'll keep it in mind and see if I can 
try it the next time there is a thick fog (assuming I am somewhere 
stationary and have the pointer handy rather than being stuck behind 
the wheel trying to get through it myself . . . ).  And since you 
mentioned this, I wonder what it would look like during a moderate to 
heavy snowfall?  Not that such seems to be in the short-range 
forecast:  it is supposed to be in the upper 60s-low 70s the next few 
days.  OTOH, the blizzard of '93 occurred in mid-March, so I 
suppose it's not completely out of the question . . .



--Ronn!  :)

Since I was a small boy, two states have been added to our country 
and two words have been added to the pledge of Allegiance... UNDER 
GOD.  Wouldn't it be a pity if someone said that is a prayer and that 
would be eliminated from schools too?

   -- Red Skelton

(Someone asked me to change my .sig quote back, so I did.)




___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Semi-OTC Lasers

2006-02-27 Thread Klaus Stock
 who had a meeting Tuesday evening and came home through some really
 nasty fog, and who really, really wishes the county had sprung for
 paint on one road in particular

 I'd be interested in the answer to that question, too, but afaik we
 haven't had any thick fog like that since I got it, unless perhaps
snip

Hazers and fog machines are used to make light beams visible in professional
lighting applications. In other words, if you have a PA rental service or a
discotheque around, you might be able to arrange for some demonstation of
their fog machines (hazers provide, as the name suggests, haze; this is
sufficient to make beams visible, but does not significantly limit the
visibility).

You'll get a bit blinded by the reflected/diffused light from the laser
youself if you stand in a thick fog. As your eyes adapt to the very bright
beam nearby, and the fog limits your vision as well, you won't be able to
see the beam further away. You'll need a second person who travels along the
beam to observe in the fog.

Note that extremely thick fog (visibility signifiacntly less that 1m/3ft) is
uncommon even in professional lighting. Loss of orientation is one thing,
but panic isn't very far away at this point as well. However, it might be an
option for your research. Instead of visibility range 50m, you could work
at much closer ranges and scale accordingly.

Best regards, Klaus

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Semi-OTC Lasers

2006-02-26 Thread Robert Seeberger
Julia Thompson wrote:
 Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
 P.S.  It's pretty well overcast tonight.  Unlike the spotlight
 someone has going to the NE of here, my pointer will not reach far
 enough to put a visible spot on the clouds.  It will suffice,
 however, to mark any branch on any tree visible from here.

 How far will it get through thick fog?  I mean the sort of fog that
 makes you wish you hand't had a meeting away from home that evening
 because you're crawling along at 15 mph because if you go much 
 faster,
 you might not see the edge of the road before you start to go off, 
 and
 you're taking the turns around 5 to make sure you don't end up in 
 one
 of the deep ditches on either side of the road you're turning on to.

Some laser funG:

http://www.ibiblio.org/Dave/Dr-Fun/df9706/df970626.jpg

http://www.repairfaq.org/sam/humor/cdllptr1.gif

A microwave laser:
http://www.repairfaq.org/sam/humor/ultlptr.gif

How to build a laser with strawberry jelly:
http://www.rugbyschool.net/sub/phusion/articles/laser.htm


xponent
Funday Morning Maru
rob 


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Semi-OTC Lasers

2006-02-25 Thread Klaus Stock
 label on the one I have here) that the human eye isn't very sensitive
 to it.  The green ones lase at 532nm, which is near the wavelength
 (~550nm) where the human eye is most sensitive, so the beam from a
 green laser is much more visible than that from a red laser of the
 same power, making the beam from a class 1 green laser pointer
 visible in a dark room or outside at night (even when there are some
 lights not too far away) as it reflects off moisture and dust
 particles naturally present in the air.

I also forgot that a shorter wavelength means scattering at smaller
particles (which a beam of longer wavelangth would ignore). The reason why
blue light gets scattered by tobacco smoke (the causes the visible effect of
the smoke appearing blue).

- Klaus

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Semi-OTC Lasers

2006-02-25 Thread Julia Thompson

Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
P.S.  It's pretty well overcast tonight.  Unlike the spotlight someone 
has going to the NE of here, my pointer will not reach far enough to put 
a visible spot on the clouds.  It will suffice, however, to mark any 
branch on any tree visible from here.


How far will it get through thick fog?  I mean the sort of fog that 
makes you wish you hand't had a meeting away from home that evening 
because you're crawling along at 15 mph because if you go much faster, 
you might not see the edge of the road before you start to go off, and 
you're taking the turns around 5 to make sure you don't end up in one of 
the deep ditches on either side of the road you're turning on to.


Julia

who had a meeting Tuesday evening and came home through some really 
nasty fog, and who really, really wishes the county had sprung for paint 
on one road in particular


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Semi-OTC Lasers

2006-02-24 Thread Klaus Stock
 And more easily blind people than the class 1 lasers.
 
 Want to kill someone? Wait till he drives past on th efreeway, point the
 laser at his eyes and there he goes. The perfect crime, killing people
with
 an intuitive point and click interface.


 I have a class 1 green laser rated at 4.99mW that I use for a star
 pointer which would likely be sufficient for that purpose.  (Drives
 the cat crazy, too.)  The downside of doing what you describe at
 night is that the beam of even a class 1 green laser is visible at
 night (the very reason it is useful for pointing out objects in the
 sky), so any witnesses would be able to describe where the beam came
 from.  The laser Rob described is actually bright enough that the

I was temporarily blinded by a red laser while traveling in a train (some
years ago). I suppose one these normal laser pointers. The air was clear and
I could not make out where the beam came from. I ssume that the beam was
turned on before it hit me, that it took the operator a few seconds to home
in. If I had noticed the beam (or the spot) before, I would have taken
appropiate measures (having worked around industrial lasers of the
cuts-though-concrete-walls variety, I am trained to extreme reactions at the
sight of a laser beam getting close...). I didn't immediately realize what
happened when the beam hit my left eye - it was the first time that I looked
into a laser beam.

Since then, I have a few black spots flyling before my left eye (such laser
damage was described to me as being like flies flying in front of your
eye, and now I can confirm that). A normal retinography shows nothings, but
I can see it, close to the center of my field of view. Took me more than a
year to get used to it.

However, even temporary blinding will be a problem when, for example,
entering a curve. Traffic in the opposite direction is very close, and
during the curve entrace, it is not sufficient just to keep the steering
wheel in position.

Yup, there are people who enjoy throwing rocks from freeway bridges. People
aleady got killed by that. Green lasers might be the new geek way to have
such fun...

- Klaus

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Semi-OTC Lasers

2006-02-24 Thread Ronn!Blankenship

At 10:11 AM Friday 2/24/2006, Klaus Stock wrote:

 And more easily blind people than the class 1 lasers.
 
 Want to kill someone? Wait till he drives past on th efreeway, point the
 laser at his eyes and there he goes. The perfect crime, killing people
with
 an intuitive point and click interface.


 I have a class 1 green laser rated at 4.99mW that I use for a star
 pointer which would likely be sufficient for that purpose.  (Drives
 the cat crazy, too.)  The downside of doing what you describe at
 night is that the beam of even a class 1 green laser is visible at
 night (the very reason it is useful for pointing out objects in the
 sky), so any witnesses would be able to describe where the beam came
 from.  The laser Rob described is actually bright enough that the

I was temporarily blinded by a red laser while traveling in a train (some
years ago). I suppose one these normal laser pointers. The air was clear and
I could not make out where the beam came from.




About the only way to make the standard red laser pointer beam 
visible is to be in a reasonably dark room (e.g., a lecture hall with 
the main room lights out and the main illumination being the lights 
on the blackboard or the light coming from a movie or video screen at 
the front upon which something is projected) and then to have the 
room filled with smoke or steam or to take a couple of dirty erasers 
off the chalk tray and clap them together to fill the air with chalk 
dust, and the beam won't stay visible for long.  That's because the 
color of the beam is such a deep red (630-680nm, according to the 
label on the one I have here) that the human eye isn't very sensitive 
to it.  The green ones lase at 532nm, which is near the wavelength 
(~550nm) where the human eye is most sensitive, so the beam from a 
green laser is much more visible than that from a red laser of the 
same power, making the beam from a class 1 green laser pointer 
visible in a dark room or outside at night (even when there are some 
lights not too far away) as it reflects off moisture and dust 
particles naturally present in the air.




 I ssume that the beam was
turned on before it hit me, that it took the operator a few seconds to home
in. If I had noticed the beam (or the spot) before, I would have taken
appropiate measures (having worked around industrial lasers of the
cuts-though-concrete-walls variety, I am trained to extreme reactions at the
sight of a laser beam getting close...). I didn't immediately realize what
happened when the beam hit my left eye - it was the first time that I looked
into a laser beam.



The first time I recall that happening was back in the early 70s when 
I was in one of the university physics labs and opened the door to 
the next lab (that building was designed in a square ring with most 
of the classrooms and faculty offices around the outside and the 
inside occupied by a series of interconnecting labs with the 
equipment room, power supply board, etc., in the middle) and 
discovered that someone had a low-power HeNe laser pointed at the 
other side of the door.  (I think someone had taped a piece of white 
paper to the door to use for a screen to demonstrate diffraction 
patterns.)  As an astronomer, I do keep a pretty close eye on my 
vision (:)), and I haven't noticed any damage from that or subsequent 
accidental exposures, although I do take care to avoid exposure.





Since then, I have a few black spots flyling before my left eye (such laser
damage was described to me as being like flies flying in front of your
eye, and now I can confirm that). A normal retinography shows nothings, but
I can see it, close to the center of my field of view. Took me more than a
year to get used to it.

However, even temporary blinding will be a problem when, for example,
entering a curve. Traffic in the opposite direction is very close, and
during the curve entrace, it is not sufficient just to keep the steering
wheel in position.




That's what I was thinking of, and indeed this green laser pointer I 
have would be more than sufficient for that purpose.  At night, 
shining it into another room with light-colored walls or ceiling 
illuminates the other room just as well as shining a flashlight in 
there would.





Yup, there are people who enjoy throwing rocks from freeway bridges. People
aleady got killed by that.




Including a professor at another university here in Alabama a few 
years ago when an iirc 10-lb rock came crashing through her windshield.





Green lasers might be the new geek way to have
such fun...




I fear that will be so.  Particularly now that the prices for class 1 
green lasers are significantly less than $100.  (They are still 
considerably more expensive than common red laser pointers because to 
get the green color requires a 2-step process:  the first step 
generates an infrared laser beam at 1064nm, then the second step 
doubles the frequency to get the green wavelength of 532nm.  This 
also makes them 

Re: Semi-OTC Lasers

2006-02-24 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
P.S.  It's pretty well overcast tonight.  Unlike the spotlight 
someone has going to the NE of here, my pointer will not reach far 
enough to put a visible spot on the clouds.  It will suffice, 
however, to mark any branch on any tree visible from here.




--Ronn!  :)

Since I was a small boy, two states have been added to our country 
and two words have been added to the pledge of Allegiance... UNDER 
GOD.  Wouldn't it be a pity if someone said that is a prayer and that 
would be eliminated from schools too?

   -- Red Skelton

(Someone asked me to change my .sig quote back, so I did.)




___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Semi-OTC Lasers

2006-02-23 Thread Robert G. Seeberger
http://wickedlasers.com/

For the last few months you have been able to buy lasers that could 
pop balloons, melt trash bags, cut electrical tape, and melt through 
plastic. It is a fairly interesting advance in materials science that 
allows consumers to do such things with an over-the-counter product. 
(Of course, you aren't going to find these at your local electronics 
stores)
The lasers here (especially the green ones) tout some amazing 
capabilities such as being visible(the priciest model) at 120 
miles(193.12128 K)while using 3 volts of power supplied by everyday AA 
or AAA batteries that should last for 2 hours (2 metric hoursG) on a 
100% duty cycle, even if the laser itself costs $2000 (1648 
Euro/1129British pound).

I expect that the price of lasers with this kind of capability will 
come down over time and that simultaneously, legislation to curb their 
availability and criminalize their misuse will occur.

These kinds of lasers are somewhat dangerous toys in the hands of the 
well intentioned, but in the hands of crafty and mischievous 
malcontents.

To be clear, these particular devices have *some* potential for 
misuse, but I expect that the next generation of devices that will 
come on the heels of cheaper devices of this generation will have 
capabilities that could be problematic for security and law 
enforcement, hence the expectation of more restrictive legislation 
concerning their possession and use.

xponent
Call For Comment Maru
rob



___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Semi-OTC Lasers

2006-02-23 Thread Klaus Stock
 For the last few months you have been able to buy lasers that could
 pop balloons, melt trash bags, cut electrical tape, and melt through
 plastic.

And more easily blind people than the class 1 lasers.

Want to kill someone? Wait till he drives past on th efreeway, point the
laser at his eyes and there he goes. The perfect crime, killing people with
an intuitive point and click interface.

- Klaus

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Semi-OTC Lasers

2006-02-23 Thread Charlie Bell


On Feb 24, 2006, at 12:15 AM, Robert G. Seeberger wrote:


To be clear, these particular devices have *some* potential for
misuse, but I expect that the next generation of devices that will
come on the heels of cheaper devices of this generation will have
capabilities that could be problematic for security and law
enforcement, hence the expectation of more restrictive legislation
concerning their possession and use.


Well yes. There are increasing problems for pilots - people with  
lasers like to illuminate planes and choppers, and pilots are at risk  
of dazzling or eye damage.


Was a report on Australian tv last night, so I'm now an expert. ;)

Charlie
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Semi-OTC Lasers

2006-02-23 Thread Ronn!Blankenship

At 09:12 AM Thursday 2/23/2006, Klaus Stock wrote:

 For the last few months you have been able to buy lasers that could
 pop balloons, melt trash bags, cut electrical tape, and melt through
 plastic.

And more easily blind people than the class 1 lasers.

Want to kill someone? Wait till he drives past on th efreeway, point the
laser at his eyes and there he goes. The perfect crime, killing people with
an intuitive point and click interface.



I have a class 1 green laser rated at 4.99mW that I use for a star 
pointer which would likely be sufficient for that purpose.  (Drives 
the cat crazy, too.)  The downside of doing what you describe at 
night is that the beam of even a class 1 green laser is visible at 
night (the very reason it is useful for pointing out objects in the 
sky), so any witnesses would be able to describe where the beam came 
from.  The laser Rob described is actually bright enough that the 
beam can be see in the daytime (I'm not sure about in bright 
sunlight).  I'd like to get one for demonstrations in class but don't 
have a spare $2K atm.



-- Ronn! :)

Ronn Blankenship
Sometime Adjunct Instructor of Astronomy/Planetary Science
University of Montevallo
Montevallo, AL

Disclaimer:  Unless specifically stated otherwise, any opinions 
contained herein are the personal opinions of the author and do not 
represent the official position of the University of Montevallo.



___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Semi-OTC Lasers

2006-02-23 Thread Ronn!Blankenship

At 01:54 PM Thursday 2/23/2006, Charlie Bell wrote:


On Feb 24, 2006, at 12:15 AM, Robert G. Seeberger wrote:


To be clear, these particular devices have *some* potential for
misuse, but I expect that the next generation of devices that will
come on the heels of cheaper devices of this generation will have
capabilities that could be problematic for security and law
enforcement, hence the expectation of more restrictive legislation
concerning their possession and use.


Well yes. There are increasing problems for pilots - people with
lasers like to illuminate planes and choppers, and pilots are at risk
of dazzling or eye damage.




People don't think.  And I don't let anyone else use my green laser 
pointer.  Or, in fact any of the red ones.  (Some idea of how much 
the price of the latter have come down is that I found a pen for $3 
which has a red laser pointer and blue LED flashlight included.)





Was a report on Australian tv last night, so I'm now an expert. ;)




Of course!


--Ronn!  :)

Since I was a small boy, two states have been added to our country 
and two words have been added to the pledge of Allegiance... UNDER 
GOD.  Wouldn't it be a pity if someone said that is a prayer and that 
would be eliminated from schools too?

   -- Red Skelton

(Someone asked me to change my .sig quote back, so I did.)




___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Semi-OTC Lasers

2006-02-23 Thread Robert Seeberger

- Original Message - 
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 9:17 PM
Subject: Re: Semi-OTC Lasers


 At 09:12 AM Thursday 2/23/2006, Klaus Stock wrote:
  For the last few months you have been able to buy lasers that 
  could
  pop balloons, melt trash bags, cut electrical tape, and melt 
  through
  plastic.

And more easily blind people than the class 1 lasers.

Want to kill someone? Wait till he drives past on th efreeway, point 
the
laser at his eyes and there he goes. The perfect crime, killing 
people with
an intuitive point and click interface.


 I have a class 1 green laser rated at 4.99mW that I use for a star 
 pointer which would likely be sufficient for that purpose.  (Drives 
 the cat crazy, too.)  The downside of doing what you describe at 
 night is that the beam of even a class 1 green laser is visible at 
 night (the very reason it is useful for pointing out objects in the 
 sky), so any witnesses would be able to describe where the beam came 
 from.  The laser Rob described is actually bright enough that the 
 beam can be see in the daytime (I'm not sure about in bright 
 sunlight).  I'd like to get one for demonstrations in class but 
 don't have a spare $2K atm.


Retinal damage is a very real problem even with low powered lasers and 
is likely the more frequent type of laser misuse.

 The danger I am thinking about concerns such lasers ability to cut 
through plastics and such. What if one were to use a laser to cut 
through a barrier that separated two chemicals that normally should be 
kept a good distance from each other?
I suspect that the list of such chemicals is much larger than the list 
of chemicals normally searched for, frex when boarding planes.
How about water and phosphorus? I imagine there are also some normally 
innocuous chemicals (precursors) that when combined create a poisonous 
gas or possibly a nerve agent.
Significantly increasing the numbers and types of chemicals that law 
and security agencies *need* to search for is quite a problem.
I expect that I am imagining only the simplest variations of such a 
device. but it seems to me that such a device would be fairly simple 
to build and conceal/disguise.

xponent
Pandora's Box Of Tricks Maru
rob 


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l