Jonathan Gibson wrote:
I read Cassini Division over the few quiet times I found
at Burning Man last week (...)
The first time I heard about this Burning Man was in
a Malcolm-in-the-Middle episode. It sounds like Brazilian
Carnival, but tamer :-P
Alberto Monteiro
On Sep 8, 2006, at 2:50 PM, Alberto Vieira Ferreira Monteiro wrote:
Jonathan Gibson wrote:
Who's arguing absolute pacifism?
I operate on the Fight end of the Spectrum and not Fear, but that
doesn't mean I need to reduce everything to fisticuffs. I simply face
my fears head on. It's the
Robert,
I agree whole-heartedly.
I'll fly mine in defiance... and upside-down in accordance with a Ship
In Distress rules of the open sea.
- Jonathan -
On Sep 8, 2006, at 7:27 PM, Robert G. Seeberger wrote:
Ann Holland wrote:
Remember to honor those who have served and this great country
On Sep 11, 2006, at 4:24 AM, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Jonathan Gibson wrote:
I read Cassini Division over the few quiet times I found
at Burning Man last week (...)
The first time I heard about this Burning Man was in
a Malcolm-in-the-Middle episode. It sounds like Brazilian
Carnival, but
My, AndrewC, you are a prickly one aren't you?
You come out all fire and scorching brimstone from the get-go on this
topic.
Expect push-back.
On Sep 8, 2006, at 1:48 AM, Andrew Crystall wrote:
On 7 Sep 2006 at 20:04, Gibson Jonathan wrote:
As an artist hovering around the computer
Jonathan Gibson wrote:
Because the USA may be the target of nuclear terrorism. OTOH,
nuclear terrorists might explode a bomb anywhere they can, just
to show they have it.
OK.
How does this make any difference? We faced nuclear megadeath
of enormous proportions for decades w/o erosion of
On Sep 11, 2006, at 9:51 AM, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Jonathan Gibson wrote:
Because the USA may be the target of nuclear terrorism. OTOH,
nuclear terrorists might explode a bomb anywhere they can, just
to show they have it.
OK.
How does this make any difference? We faced nuclear megadeath
On 11 Sep 2006 at 9:49, Gibson Jonathan wrote:
My, AndrewC, you are a prickly one aren't you?
You come out all fire and scorching brimstone from the get-go on this
topic.
Expect push-back.
It's called reason, applied, and a defence of a tolerant view. And
Except what I'm getting from you
Some of it seems to be -- the Wiki piece has claims that could easily
pass 100K already. The info at http://iraqbodycount.org/ seems to be
about half that. But that's current numbers, and I think Nick was
projecting through to the end of the war.
It wasn't me, it was the article I quoted... but
On 9/7/06, The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
E. You know nothing. You are a Fvcking idiot and a troll.
And you have made an unambiguously personal attack there... which is
contrary to our community's guidelines.
I'm inclined to be less tolerant of personal attacks by people who
participate
At 11:49 AM Monday 9/11/2006, Gibson Jonathan wrote:
My, AndrewC, you are a prickly one aren't you?
You come out all fire and scorching brimstone from the get-go on this topic.
Expect push-back.
[...] By the standards of clerks, teachers, bus drivers, cooks, you
sir, are a technophile. Let's
At 12:24 PM Monday 9/11/2006, Gibson Jonathan wrote:
Nonesense. Why do the puppetmasters pushing suicide bombers have
less to lose than the soviet aparatchniks did?
'Cuz a cave somewhere in Afghanistan or Pakistan is harder to
program into the nav system of a cruise missile than the GPS
On 9/8/06, Jim Sharkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are we suspending the guidelines when our dedicated atheists and devout theists
get into the ring to slug it out now? If we are, I can bring popcorn if
someone else will bring the beers!
We had a serious shortage of list managers starting
On 11 Sep 2006 at 12:47, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
[...] Evangelism of any particular
platform for anything but price/performance and functionality makes
me roll my eyes.
Does compatibility with other people whose stuff you have to be able
to read and run fit in there somewhere?
If it's
At 12:52 PM Monday 9/11/2006, Nick Arnett wrote:
On 9/7/06, The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
E. You know nothing. You are a Fvcking idiot and a troll.
And you have made an unambiguously personal attack there... which is
contrary to our community's guidelines.
I'm inclined to be less
On Sep 11, 2006, at 10:24 AM, Gibson Jonathan wrote:
Nonesense. Why do the puppetmasters pushing suicide bombers have
less to lose than the soviet aparatchniks did? There are any
number off technical, political, cultural, etc, reasons for a
ffoolish leadership to intentionally, or by
On 11 Sep 2006 at 10:39, Nick Arnett wrote:
Some of it seems to be -- the Wiki piece has claims that could easily
pass 100K already. The info at http://iraqbodycount.org/ seems to be
about half that. But that's current numbers, and I think Nick was
projecting through to the end of the
On Sep 11, 2006, at 10:24 AM, Gibson Jonathan wrote:
Is it starve a cold and feed a fever, or other way around?
I believe the old saying is starve a cold, feed a fever.
The logic is that by starving a cold, you don't give it a
bunch of gunk from which to make mucous (Mmm, tasty) and by
On 9/8/06, William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In normal binary logic (true/false) these are equivalent since ~true
(NOT true) = false (and ~false = true).
And in normal SQL logic, there is NULL, TRUE and FALSE. But if you
imagine we are just computers, no wonder you won't make room
Nick said:
And in normal SQL logic, there is NULL, TRUE and FALSE. But if you
imagine we are just computers, no wonder you won't make room for
faith.
NULL values are the work of the Devil!
Rich
GCU One Line Reply
___
On Sep 11, 2006, at 1:30 PM, Nick Arnett wrote:
On 9/8/06, William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In normal binary logic (true/false) these are equivalent since ~true
(NOT true) = false (and ~false = true).
And in normal SQL logic, there is NULL, TRUE and FALSE. But if you
imagine we
jdiebremse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
...You mention that
it was critical that they conserve these resources
- and perhaps I am
being a bit of a devil's advocate to ask why?
So that they would be
able to continue to build moai into the future?
O.k. obviously the
loss of the
I just blogged about a great surprise I had on the way home from the
office this afternoon.
http://www.mccmedia.com/cismblog/
I stopped for gas today at a station near my house. While I was
kneeling next to the car to check my tires' air pressure, I heard
something that sounded like a bagpipe.
At 04:10 PM Monday 9/11/2006, Deborah Harrell wrote:
Japan was also cited for its
top-down approach to reforestation
I really would like to see them growing trees from the top down . . .
-- Ronn! :)
___
On 9/11/06, Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
..
No. Anytime a culture squanders its resources, it
runs the risk of destroying itself; it may be made
worse by the natural environment (like Greenland) or
climatic change (frex the little ice age).
An aside: has anyone
25 matches
Mail list logo
