After one week, I am 11-5.
Buffalo at Miami - The Bills return to the scene of the crime, where
they blew a 21 point lead last season. Unfortunately, the Fish have
had a long week to prepare, will benefit from 90 degree heat, and Bills
QB JP Losman has yet to show that he can play a complete
I bow to all of your greater intellects training.
I recognize the need to split the political from the physical on this
topic. My training is insufficient to explore many of the arcane
directions of science this leads and clearly my brain has gelled into
some kind of tapioca over the
On 17/09/2006, at 9:12 AM, Dan Minette wrote:
The first thing I want to address is the idea that folks who have the
knowledge needed to demonstrate something is clearly wrong with an
official
report fail to do so out of fear of losing work because they are
lumped with
the tinfoil hat
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Doug Pensinger
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 11:54 PM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: Jobs, not trees! (Collapse, Chapter 2)
Dan wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
On Sep 16, 2006, at 4:24 PM, William T Goodall wrote:
On 16 Sep 2006, at 9:12PM, Dave Land wrote:
After watching the Pyroclastic video that WTG pointed to,
Not me.
Just to clear that up Maru
Of course not. It was Jonathan Gibson.
Gibson ... Goodall ... I think there's more to the
John D. Giorgis wrote:
NY Giants at Philadelphia - Pick: EAGLES
How about them Giants?? I can't believe they turned that around, as
they were being soundly whupped for the first 40 minutes of the game.
Though I have to wonder if it's a sign of their resiliency or the
Eagles' inability to
Good to here from you. So even though you are clearly wrong about 9/11
(everyone knows that it was a mutant energizer buddy sent by the Bush daughters
because they could not count up to 103 and were therefore insulted by the
towers) I hope you have some more insight into the collapse of
In a message dated 9/17/2006 3:29:42 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think a key point in the moral tale is the assumption that the population
lived on the island for hundreds of years before the deforestation took
place. This fits well with people who are in touch
On 18 Sep 2006, at 12:43AM, Dave Land wrote:
On Sep 16, 2006, at 4:24 PM, William T Goodall wrote:
On 16 Sep 2006, at 9:12PM, Dave Land wrote:
After watching the Pyroclastic video that WTG pointed to,
Not me.
Just to clear that up Maru
Of course not. It was Jonathan Gibson.
Gibson
On 9/15/06, Gautam Mukunda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So either my entire immediate family and a surprising
proportion of my friends, and I, were all in on the
conspiracy
I'm sorry, but I don't quite see why it would be necessary for you and
your various acquaintances to have been part or or
Dan wrote:
Popular science programs (especially on places like the Discovery
channel) often/usually overstate the scientific certainty in such
matters.
We're discussing Diamond's book Collapse, as is indicated in the subject
header, and while I have no objection whatsoever to your
Bob wrote:
Good to here from you. So even though you are clearly wrong about 9/11
(everyone knows that it was a mutant energizer buddy sent by the Bush
daughters because they could not count up to 103 and were therefore
insulted by the
towers) I hope you have some more insight into the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Nick Arnett
Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2006 9:17 PM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: 9/11 conspiracies (WAS RE: What should we believe when there
is no reliable information?)
On 9/15/06,
--- Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nick wrote:
Is there
some reason I'm not
aware of that you and your network of highly
placed acquaintances
would need to be notified if we were planning an
act of high treason?
In his rush to play the man instead of the ball, Nick
completely
14 matches
Mail list logo
