Re: Avatar

2009-12-28 Thread John Horn
Agreed.  Just got back from seeing it.  Wow.  The movie business just jumped
into another dimension with this one.

I had two Brin-L related thoughts while watching this movie:  1) Did Brin
come up with the name Unobtainium?  and 2) Hollywood is definitely ready to
do Startide Rising!

On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 2:31 AM, Charlie Bell char...@culturelist.orgwrote:

 No spoilers here. Just got home from the World's Larg^H Secon^H Third
 Biggest Screen in 3D. Just see it. The story may be kitsch and predictable,
 but it's definitely a leap forward in CGI realism, and it's a hell of a
 ride.

 Charlie.


 ___
 http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com


___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Avatar

2009-12-26 Thread Charlie Bell
No spoilers here. Just got home from the World's Larg^H Secon^H Third Biggest 
Screen in 3D. Just see it. The story may be kitsch and predictable, but it's 
definitely a leap forward in CGI realism, and it's a hell of a ride. 

Charlie.


___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Avatar

2009-12-26 Thread Doug Pensinger
 Ronn! wrote:

 Complete article:

 Op-Ed Columnist - Heaven and Nature - NYTimes.com -
 http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/21/opinion/21douthat1.html
 http://tinyurl.com/ye43c8x

He concludes:

Religion exists, in part, precisely because humans aren’t at home
amid these cruel rhythms. We stand half inside the natural world and
half outside it. We’re beasts with self-consciousness, predators with
ethics, mortal creatures who yearn for immortality.

This is an agonized position, and if there’s no escape upward — or no
God to take on flesh and come among us, as the Christmas story has it
— a deeply tragic one.

Pantheism offers a different sort of solution: a downward exit, an
abandonment of our tragic self-consciousness, a re-merger with the
natural world our ancestors half-escaped millennia ago.

But except as dust and ashes, Nature cannot take us back.

I see it a bit differently.  We stand half outside the natural world
and half inside it because, in part, of religion.  Intelligent humans
found that they could use their intelligence to manipulate and control
other humans including the more traditional leaders, those who  used
their strength and size to their advantage.  The race began to select
for intelligence and voila, here we are.

And I further disagree that there is no escape upward.  You survive;
your DNA survives when you reproduce and further if you do a good job
of parenting, your ideals are perpetuated.

I don't know about pantheism, but I see a balance with nature as vital
to our survival and perpetuation.  We may conquer nature here on
earth, we may even go on to conquer nature on numerous planets but we
will never, ever have the wherewithal to conquer all of the natural
universe.

What always bugs me about religion is how it seems to excuse the rape
and destruction of the natural world that they believe that their god
gave to them as a precious gift.  Imagine spending hours of your time
and the depths of your soul to create something for someone and then
seeing that person trash your creation with little regard for what
went into it.

So while I don't believe that there is any place where I can stick my
pigtail into a magic tree and awaken gaia, I think we have much to
learn from nature, I have a tremendous appreciation for the geological
and biological creations nature has taken millions of years to
construct, and I think it is tremendously important to take care of
our environment for our own sake.

Doug

___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Avatar

2009-12-26 Thread Dave Land

On Dec 26, 2009, at 12:31 AM, Charlie Bell wrote:

No spoilers here. Just got home from the World's Larg^H Secon^H  
Third Biggest Screen in 3D. Just see it. The story may be kitsch and  
predictable, but it's definitely a leap forward in CGI realism, and  
it's a hell of a ride.


And, for a completely different take on the film from the OMG! Best.  
Movie. EVAR! that seem to predominate the reviews of Avatar:


http://io9.com/5422666/when-will-white-people-stop-making-movies-like-avatar

There's more substance in the comments than the article, I think.

Dave Land

White^H^H^H^H^H^H Usurper Guilt Maru



___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Avatar

2009-12-25 Thread Ronn! Blankenship

At 02:34 AM Thursday 12/24/2009, Bruce Bostwick wrote:

On Dec 23, 2009, at 2:56 PM, Max Battcher wrote:


On 12/23/2009 13:11, Julia wrote:

When I've seen the preview, I've had uncanny valley issues.  I
don't think
I could sit through the whole thing without having a brain-ache.  :(


I don't think the previews do justice to the film because this
really is one of those rare films that needs 3D to do it justice and
is better the bigger the screen that you watch it on.

I particularly think the uncanny valley issues with the film
dissolve the more you let the film immerse you and large screens and
3D are key to that. This is something that James Cameron seems to
have known all along, and part of why it has become the message to
get out to encourage people to pay for that 3D or IMAX upgrade at
their local popcorn stadium.


I actually had few if any uncanny valley problems with it at all.  I
think one big factor was facial expressions -- this is the first movie
about which I've been able to say that the CG characters had a full
enough and rich enough range of expressions for the faces and
nonverbal cues to hold their own with the dialogue, and in fact
successfully replace it in ways that really surprised me.

But there was an incredible attention to detail all around, and it
required very little suspension of disbelief, and particularly
visually, less than I'm used to from most movies.  The previews really
don't do it justice at all, and I agree with Max that it's a movie
that does really need 3D to really get all of it.

As for the themes I found most interesting .. well, those would be
spoilers .. ;)




Here's an opinion from the NY Times that was reprinted here today:


“It’s fitting that James Cameron’s “Avatar” 
arrived in theaters at Christmastime. Like the 
holiday season itself, the science fiction epic 
is a crass embodiment of capitalistic excess 
wrapped around a deeply felt religious message. 
It’s at once the blockbuster to end all 
blockbusters, and the Gospel According to James.


“But not the Christian Gospel. Instead, “Avatar” 
is Cameron’s long apologia for pantheism ­ a 
faith that equates God with Nature, and calls 
humanity into religious communion with the natural world. ”



Complete article:

Op-Ed Columnist - Heaven and Nature - NYTimes.com 
- http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/21/opinion/21douthat1.html

http://tinyurl.com/ye43c8x

(Reading nytimes.com articles may require free registration.)


FYI Maru


. . . ronn!  :)



___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Avatar

2009-12-24 Thread Bruce Bostwick

On Dec 23, 2009, at 2:56 PM, Max Battcher wrote:


On 12/23/2009 13:11, Julia wrote:
When I've seen the preview, I've had uncanny valley issues.  I  
don't think

I could sit through the whole thing without having a brain-ache.  :(


I don't think the previews do justice to the film because this  
really is one of those rare films that needs 3D to do it justice and  
is better the bigger the screen that you watch it on.


I particularly think the uncanny valley issues with the film  
dissolve the more you let the film immerse you and large screens and  
3D are key to that. This is something that James Cameron seems to  
have known all along, and part of why it has become the message to  
get out to encourage people to pay for that 3D or IMAX upgrade at  
their local popcorn stadium.


I actually had few if any uncanny valley problems with it at all.  I  
think one big factor was facial expressions -- this is the first movie  
about which I've been able to say that the CG characters had a full  
enough and rich enough range of expressions for the faces and  
nonverbal cues to hold their own with the dialogue, and in fact  
successfully replace it in ways that really surprised me.


But there was an incredible attention to detail all around, and it  
required very little suspension of disbelief, and particularly  
visually, less than I'm used to from most movies.  The previews really  
don't do it justice at all, and I agree with Max that it's a movie  
that does really need 3D to really get all of it.


As for the themes I found most interesting .. well, those would be  
spoilers .. ;)




___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Films of the year (was Avatar)

2009-12-23 Thread William T Goodall

On 21 Dec 2009, at 21:53, Doug Pensinger wrote:

 I saw Avatar last night in the Imax/3D format.  It was by far the most
 awesome audio/visual experience I've ever had.  The story was fair to
 good, but the eye candy was spectacular.  I wouldn't have thought I
 could get vertigo while sitting in a comfortable arm chair.  Cool; see
 it and pay the extra for Imax.
 
 Doug

I don't think I'll get to see that until 2010. My favourite of the films I did 
get to see in 2009 was 

_Let The Right One In_

And other movies I rated highly were (in the order I saw them)

_Slumdog Millionaire_

_Watchmen_

_Anything For Her_

_Moon_

_District 9_

_Fish Tank_

_The Imaginarium of Dr Parnassus_



Lists Maru
-- 
William T Goodall
Mail : w...@wtgab.demon.co.uk
Web  : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk 
Blog : http://blog.williamgoodall.name/

“Babies are born every day without an iPod. We will get there.” - Adam Sohn, 
the head of public relations for Microsoft’s Zune division.


___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



RE: Avatar

2009-12-23 Thread Julia


I saw Avatar last night in the Imax/3D format.  It was by far the most
awesome audio/visual experience I've ever had.  The story was fair to good,
but the eye candy was spectacular.  I wouldn't have thought I could get
vertigo while sitting in a comfortable arm chair.  Cool; see it and pay the
extra for Imax.

Doug

___


When I've seen the preview, I've had uncanny valley issues.  I don't think
I could sit through the whole thing without having a brain-ache.  :(

Julia


___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Avatar

2009-12-23 Thread Max Battcher

On 12/23/2009 13:11, Julia wrote:

When I've seen the preview, I've had uncanny valley issues.  I don't think
I could sit through the whole thing without having a brain-ache.  :(


I don't think the previews do justice to the film because this really is 
one of those rare films that needs 3D to do it justice and is better the 
bigger the screen that you watch it on.


I particularly think the uncanny valley issues with the film dissolve 
the more you let the film immerse you and large screens and 3D are key 
to that. This is something that James Cameron seems to have known all 
along, and part of why it has become the message to get out to encourage 
people to pay for that 3D or IMAX upgrade at their local popcorn stadium.


--
--Max Battcher--
http://worldmaker.net

___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Avatar

2009-12-22 Thread Jo Anne
We saw it in regular 3D last Saturday night.  I'm *still* gob smacked.  What
a beautiful film.  The story was a bit pedestrian, but it's on my absolutely
must see list for friends/family.

Amities, all.

Jo Anne
evens...@hevanet.com

Doug wrote:
 I saw Avatar last night in the Imax/3D format.  It was by far the most
 awesome audio/visual experience I've ever had.  The story was fair to
 good, but the eye candy was spectacular.  I wouldn't have thought I
 could get vertigo while sitting in a comfortable arm chair.  Cool; see
 it and pay the extra for Imax.



___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Avatar

2009-12-21 Thread Doug Pensinger
I saw Avatar last night in the Imax/3D format.  It was by far the most
awesome audio/visual experience I've ever had.  The story was fair to
good, but the eye candy was spectacular.  I wouldn't have thought I
could get vertigo while sitting in a comfortable arm chair.  Cool; see
it and pay the extra for Imax.

Doug

___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Avatar

2009-12-21 Thread Bryon Daly
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Doug Pensinger brig...@zo.com wrote:

 I saw Avatar last night in the Imax/3D format.  It was by far the most
 awesome audio/visual experience I've ever had.  The story was fair to
 good, but the eye candy was spectacular.  I wouldn't have thought I
 could get vertigo while sitting in a comfortable arm chair.  Cool; see
 it and pay the extra for Imax.


I saw the IMAX 3D version yesterday as well.  It's fantastic.  I normally
don't care for 3D movies, but a reviewer I trust that normally hates 3D said
it was the first 3D movie that made him realize the potential it has, so I
decided to give it a shot.  After a minute or two to get used to it, it
pretty much felt natural and doesn't make you think about the 3D.  There's
no comin' at ya! effects, as far as I remember.

Even without the 3D, I suspect this will be a visually beautiful movie, but
with the IMAX screen and 3D, it's awesome.  I thought the story was good -
not terribly original, but well-told.  Probably my favorite movie this year.
___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Avatar trailer

2009-08-22 Thread William T Goodall


On 21 Aug 2009, at 16:54, Chris Frandsen wrote:


Apple - Movie Trailers - Avatar


Uncanny valley.


-- William T Goodall
Mail : w...@wtgab.demon.co.uk
Web  : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk
Blog : http://web.me.com/williamgoodall/blog/

Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit  
atrocities. ~Voltaire.



___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Avatar trailer

2009-08-21 Thread Chris Frandsen

Apple - Movie Trailers - Avatar

learner
___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com