I put in 100 EUR...
On 10/27/10, Rob Ross wrote:
> See here:
>
> http://jkoala.org/
>
>
> This so far represents the best possibility of actually making this happen!
> :)
>
> And yes, I've donated 50 EUR to the cause, and intend to contribute software
> development as well.
>
>
> Rob
>
> On Oct 2
Hi all,
First of all, sorry if this mail breaks your in-thread mail client
formatting, but I just subscribed to the list.
I was redirected here from a comment on my blog:
http://www.jroller.com/neugens/entry/java_on_mac
I was asked few times during the last couple of years how feasible
would be
On 10/28/10 2:12 AM, Landon Fuller wrote:
>
> I would personally like to see what we can accomplish as part of the OpenJDK
> BSD-Port project, as well as trying to open a dialog with Oracle (and maybe
> Apple), if possible. I'd like to try to see what Oracle's interest is,
> whether they'd be w
On Oct 27, 2010, at 4:03 PM, Rob Ross wrote:
> The stated license for the project is the same as OpenJDK7, so there would be
> no difficulties in pulling the JKoala code into OpenJDK down the road if that
> made sense for everyone.
>
> I think having a separate, single-focused effort by a guy
The stated license for the project is the same as OpenJDK7, so there would be
no difficulties in pulling the JKoala code into OpenJDK down the road if that
made sense for everyone.
I think having a separate, single-focused effort by a guy who knows how do to
what needs to be done is the most im
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:14 PM, John Yeary wrote:
> I am not sure about the JKoala project. I would like to push more for
> getting Apple to contribute to OpenJDK and donate their Aqua bits as open
> source, or as a binary plug.
>
> In response to 10.7 or 10.8 not coming with Java, I don't want
I am not sure about the JKoala project. I would like to push more for
getting Apple to contribute to OpenJDK and donate their Aqua bits as open
source, or as a binary plug.
In response to 10.7 or 10.8 not coming with Java, I don't want to put my
faith in it happening. I would rather start working
Why do people think that Java won't be available under Lion. I fully expect it
to come installed. They have marked it as *deprecated* rather than *optional*.
Perhaps it might be missing from 10.8 but I doubt it.
Sam
On Oct 26, 2010, at 10:09 PM, Rob Ross wrote:
> See here:
>
> http://jkoala.
See here:
http://jkoala.org/
This so far represents the best possibility of actually making this happen! :)
And yes, I've donated 50 EUR to the cause, and intend to contribute software
development as well.
Rob
On Oct 26, 2010, at 6:48 PM, Lussier, Denis wrote:
> It's my personal goal that
It's my personal goal that it be run well behaved Java client (swing
and swk) and server apps (tomcat, jboss, etc, etc) perfectly. In
short, any 100% pure java app will run. We must keep in mind that
older versions of Eclipse for OSX are hardcoded to use the built in
Apple JVM's and ignore the JA
24 okt 2010 kl. 13.56 Lussier, Denis wrote:
> I believe that getting IcedTea to work on an OSX port is a great
> thing, but... I I think this should be an extended goal that's
> tackled first for OpenJDK 7 (since it already builds on OSX).
>
> I think the milestones toward getting a robust
I believe that getting IcedTea to work on an OSX port is a great thing,
but... I I think this should be an extended goal that's tackled first for
OpenJDK 7 (since it already builds on OSX).
I think the milestones toward getting a robust OSX release for OpenJDK 6
should be:
1.) Get a baseline bui
12 matches
Mail list logo
