Re: newtags

2005-04-19 Thread Frank Hemer
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 20:41, Derek Price wrote: > > I'd like to see my latest patch from 2005-04-08 18:03 beeing > > commited to the newtags branch so I can continue working on it ... > > Sorry. I ran the tests and saw them pass the other day but I had been > having a hard time finding the time

Re: newtags

2005-04-19 Thread Derek Price
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Frank Hemer wrote: > On Tuesday 19 April 2005 20:41, Derek Price wrote: > >>> I'd like to see my latest patch from 2005-04-08 18:03 beeing >>> commited to the newtags branch so I can continue working on it >>> ... >> >> Sorry. I ran the tests and saw

Re: newtags

2005-04-19 Thread Derek Price
Oh, if you hadn't gathered, I committed your latest patch to the `newtags' branch. Cheers, Derek Derek Price wrote: > Frank Hemer wrote: > > >I'd like to see my latest patch from 2005-04-08 18:03 beeing > >commited to the newtags branch so I can continue working on it ... > > > > Sorry. I ran

Re: newtags

2005-04-19 Thread Derek Price
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Frank Hemer wrote: > I'd like to see my latest patch from 2005-04-08 18:03 beeing > commited to the newtags branch so I can continue working on it ... Sorry. I ran the tests and saw them pass the other day but I had been having a hard time finding

newtags

2005-04-19 Thread Frank Hemer
I'd like to see my latest patch from 2005-04-08 18:03 beeing commited to the newtags branch so I can continue working on it ... Regards Frank ___ Bug-cvs mailing list Bug-cvs@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs

Re: FW: Patch for preserving edit on files when checking out

2005-04-19 Thread Derek Price
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Derek Price wrote: > Ian Abbott wrote: > >> I've looked in my sent mail folder and Thunderbird gave it a MIME >> type of "text/x-diff", possibly based on the file extension >> ".patch". I'll try renaming it to ".txt" and see if that works. > > Seems r

Re: FW: Patch for preserving edit on files when checking out

2005-04-19 Thread Derek Price
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Derek Price wrote: > possible) and documentation (when necessary). Also, please send > patches in universal (`cvs diff -u') I've been corrected - that should be "unified", as opposed to "universal", diff format, above. But it's still `cvs diff -u'

Re: FW: Patch for preserving edit on files when checking out

2005-04-19 Thread Derek Price
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ian Abbott wrote: > I've looked in my sent mail folder and Thunderbird gave it a MIME > type of "text/x-diff", possibly based on the file extension > ".patch". I'll try renaming it to ".txt" and see if that works. Seems reasonable enough. Done. Ch

Re: FW: Patch for preserving edit on files when checking out

2005-04-19 Thread Ian Abbott
On 19/04/05 18:29, Ian Abbott wrote: Hi Derek, On 19/04/05 18:23, you wrote: Your attachment of a cleaned-up version of Darren's message didn't come through, though. Maybe Thunderbird doesn't attach messages as one of the text types? I've looked in my sent mail folder and Thunderbird gave it a MIM

Re: FW: Patch for preserving edit on files when checking out

2005-04-19 Thread Ian Abbott
Hi Derek, On 19/04/05 18:23, you wrote: Ian Abbott wrote: Possibly the attachments get stripped from the mail archive? I'm trying that out for myself now! Ian, text-only attachments should come through all right, but it may depend on your mail client. Thunderbird works all right for me when sendin

Re: FW: Patch for preserving edit on files when checking out

2005-04-19 Thread Ian Abbott
On 19/04/05 18:13, Ian Abbott wrote: On 18/04/05 14:54, Darren Bowles wrote: I've had a few people asking me for my patch, so maybe the previous one never made it to the list; I know I had attachment problems before. Possibly the attachments get stripped from the mail archive? I'm trying that ou

Re: FW: Patch for preserving edit on files when checking out

2005-04-19 Thread Derek Price
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ian Abbott wrote: > On 18/04/05 14:54, Darren Bowles wrote: > >> I've had a few people asking me for my patch, so maybe the >> previous one never made it to the list; I know I had attachment >> problems before. >> >> Please find enclosed the patch (as

Re: some files are missed in importing

2005-04-19 Thread Derek Price
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Pierre Asselin wrote: > Or, if it's not too late, delete the .cvsignore files and repeat > the import, using exactly the same release tag. Although, if the tarball you are importing from includes a .cvsignore that instructs CVS to ignore certain fil

Re: FW: Patch for preserving edit on files when checking out

2005-04-19 Thread Derek Price
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Darren Bowles wrote: > I've had a few people asking me for my patch, so maybe the previous > one never made it to the list; I know I had attachment problems > before. > > Please find enclosed the patch (as text) from the previous email. Patches will

Re: FW: Patch for preserving edit on files when checking out

2005-04-19 Thread Ian Abbott
On 18/04/05 14:54, Darren Bowles wrote: I've had a few people asking me for my patch, so maybe the previous one never made it to the list; I know I had attachment problems before. Please find enclosed the patch (as text) from the previous email. Hi Darren, Possibly the attachments get stripped fro

Test message - please ignore

2005-04-19 Thread Ian Abbott
Just testing tp see if plain text attachments (such as patches) are accepted by the list manager. With some email clients, the main message body is subject to line-wrap mangling :-) -- -=( Ian Abbott @ MEV Ltd.E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)=- -=( Tel: +44 (0)161 477 1898 FAX: +44 (0)16

Re: ylwrap should be included for any Yacc compilations.

2005-04-19 Thread Derek Price
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > Hi Derek, > > Sorry for the long delay. No problem, I understand. :) > Using ylwrap in all cases is already planed for automake-1.10 for > other reasons, so I guess that will be OK with you. Yep. That'll do. I had

RE: some files are missed in importing

2005-04-19 Thread Jim.Hyslop
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > (Hmmm, question: can a .cvsignore ignore .cvsignore ?) Yep. -- Jim Hyslop Senior Software Designer Leitch Technology International Inc. ( http://www.leitch.com ) Columnist, C/C++ Users Journal ( http://www.cuj.com/experts ) __

Re: some files are missed in importing

2005-04-19 Thread Larry Jones
Jim.Hyslop writes: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > (Hmmm, question: can a .cvsignore ignore .cvsignore ?) > Yep. But note that that only keeps CVS from marking it as an unknown file, it still honors the contents of the file (obviously). -Larry Jones Isn't it sad how some people's grip on thei

FW: Patch for preserving edit on files when checking out

2005-04-19 Thread Darren Bowles
I've had a few people asking me for my patch, so maybe the previous one never made it to the list; I know I had attachment problems before. Please find enclosed the patch (as text) from the previous email. Ta, Darren. > __ > From: Darren Bowl

Re: ylwrap should be included for any Yacc compilations.

2005-04-19 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Hi Derek, Sorry for the long delay. >>> "Derek" == Derek Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Derek> Glancing at the inline rule which was being used: Derek> ~sed '/^#/ s|y\.tab\.c|$@|' y.tab.c >[EMAIL PROTECTED] && mv [EMAIL PROTECTED] $@ Derek> Only the filename portion of the path is b

VMS 7.3-2 and CVS-1_11_20 client

2005-04-19 Thread Piet Schuermans
Following files need to be modified to enable a successful build of the released CVS-1_11_20 client on VMS USERS.PS.TOOLS.CVS.CVS-1_11_20>dir [...]*.*;2 Directory TOOLS$DISK:[USERS.PS.TOOLS.CVS.CVS-1_11_20.LIB] GETOPT.C;2 SYSTEM.H;2 Total of 2 files. Directory TOOLS$DISK:[USERS.PS.TOOLS