As "C" option I meant to run a GNU/Linux guest (VM) in a Microsoft OS
host, when the user hasn't the possibility to change the hardware node's
operating system.
El 18/03/17 a les 18:23, awake...@tutanota.de ha escrit:
> what are the benefits of using a a virtualized linux OS on a computer
> with
I would never trust microsoft, or apple. those are my thoughts on this. i have
seen a video of a russian man decode data that was being sent from his compuer
and it was actually screenshots of his desktop. social security numbers,
anything was prey. very sad.
15. Mar 2017 22:38 by
what are the benefits of using a a virtualized linux OS on a computer with
linux to connect to another computer with linux before using the internet?
wouldn't you need two houses for that?
16. Mar 2017 03:03 by informat...@actiu.net:
> My suggests:
>
> A) Use GNU/Linux as main OS in computer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_Desktop_Services
(closed source)
El 16/03/17 a les 06:59, Gary Driggs ha escrit:
> On Mar 15, 2017, Ivan Zaigralin wrote:
>
>> Absolutely anything you can direct your computer to do from
>> within window$, micro$oft can do remotely, surreptuously, and
>>
My suggests:
A) Use GNU/Linux as main OS in computer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU
B) Connect remotely to a GNU/Linux desktop and browse the web from there
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desktop_sharing
C) Run a virtual machine with GNU/Linux as guest OS
On Mar 15, 2017, Ivan Zaigralin wrote:
> Absolutely anything you can direct your computer to do from within window$,
> micro$oft can do remotely, surreptuously, and *trivially* in the technical
> sense.
I eagerly await a link to the data you have collected that proves your curious
On Wednesday, March 15, 2017 19:23:24 Gary wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017, Ivan Zaigralin wrote:
> > Here you go, pal. Section 7.b. You see where it says "computer
> > information"?
>
> 7b states: "Microsoft may use the computer information, accelerator
> information, search suggestions
No. But the difference between icecat and firefox on window$ is the difference
between good rubber boots and leaky rubber boots, while crossing the ocean.
On Wednesday, March 15, 2017 22:23:01 Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
> So you would recommend most of the planet use Microsoft Edge then?
>
> --
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017, awakeyet wrote:
> I totally agree, there is ABSOLUTELY NO REASON to use a slightly more
> secure browser like icecat on ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTINGLY BACKDOORED BOTNET
> surveillance, freedom and privacy destroying operating systems like those
> of apple and microsoft.
>
I totally agree, there is ABSOLUTELY NO REASON to use a slightly more secure
browser like icecate on ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTINGLY BACKDOORED BOTNET surveillance,
freedom and privacy destroying operating systems like those of apple and
microsoft. why? because there is no benefit. the levels of
+1
--
http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Honestly, I'm trying to cross-compile GNU IceCat from my Debian
partition, but the detail is the following: my problem is how to I do
for identify the avariable build targets that I have in my PC, because
I've installed MinGW-w64 for Debian, alongside with the steps described
in this webpage:
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 7:08 PM, Eliot Reyna wrote:
> Anyway, the latest version of GNU IceCat for Windows (38.8.0) was
> generated via cross-compile method. Thanks by make your Windows version of
> GNU IceCat.
>
Curious -- thanks for that. I actually tried building the 32-bit version on
a 64-bit
I've realized that is possible to cross-compile Firefox-based browsers.
https://easleyk.wordpress.com/2010/03/21/cross-compiling-firefox-for-mingw32/
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Developer_guide/Build_Instructions/Cross_Compile_Mozilla_for_Mingw32
Anyway, the latest version
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
> I heard that compiling Firefox is a lot more complicated than the standard
> ./configure, make, make install, ldconfig (or the use of cmake). Is that
> true?
>
A little bit but most of the hard work has been done for us. I set up a
On Mar 5, 2017, Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
> Please reconsider your discontinuation of Windows and Mac versions, as libre
> browsing is most needed in DRM-based OSes, not Linux :(
The source is still available for compilation on any platform.
--
http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
pretty *easy
El 06/03/17 a les 10:23, Narcis Garcia ha escrit:
> Libre browsing is needed in any environment; one main difference (about
> results) is that in DRM-based OSes is really difficult to reach freedom
> in this, and in libre OSes is pretty if you use IceCat.
>
>
> El 06/03/17 a les
Libre browsing is needed in any environment; one main difference (about
results) is that in DRM-based OSes is really difficult to reach freedom
in this, and in libre OSes is pretty if you use IceCat.
El 06/03/17 a les 00:11, Daniel Quintiliani ha escrit:
> Please reconsider your discontinuation
On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 11:40:45AM -0500, Rubén Rodríguez wrote:
>
> GNUzilla is the GNU version of the Mozilla suite, and GNU IceCat is the
> GNU version of the Firefox browser. Its main advantage is an ethical
> one: it is entirely free software. While the Firefox source code from
> the Mozilla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
GNUzilla is the GNU version of the Mozilla suite, and GNU IceCat is the
GNU version of the Firefox browser. Its main advantage is an ethical
one: it is entirely free software. While the Firefox source code from
the Mozilla project is free software,
20 matches
Mail list logo
