Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Build Spyblock from uBlock Origin

"the THOUSANDS of people that have switched over to GNU/LINUX and GNU icecat as a browser is a direct answer to those who oppose freedom and privacy and we shouldn't EVER compromise on what makes it great. also voted for Donald Trump because those who work for the system seem to strongly dislike

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Build Spyblock from uBlock Origin

On Oct 4, 2016, Daniel Quintiliani wrote: > > What is wrong with uBlock Origin? It seems to work a lot better than the old > Adblock Edge which was similar to Spyblock, plus it covers additional stuff > like webRTC, beacons, prefetching, etc It's great! I've been using it for years & it's saved

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Build Spyblock from uBlock Origin

What is wrong with uBlock Origin? It seems to work a lot better than the old Adblock Edge which was similar to Spyblock, plus it covers additional stuff like webRTC, beacons, prefetching, etc -- -Dan Q On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 03:10:30 +0200 (CEST), wrote: > spyblock is an excellent addon. why in

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Build Spyblock from uBlock Origin

I think this might be a troll too, what he's saying about uBlock Origin seems like he never used it and he tried to bring Donald Trump into the conversation. -- -Dan Q On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 03:33:12 +0200, mdn wrote: > > But please in the future make constructed posts this is not a chan board >

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Build Spyblock from uBlock Origin

It's under GPLv3 if there is a problem with it can be forked >an unknown group of people that seem to desperately want those addons >installed on every single browser everywhere And what the problem ? Maybe because it's actually a better alternative to any other solution. I participate myself to

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Build Spyblock from uBlock Origin

"µblock origin is really a good extension I personally use it icecat. We could go further with umatrix but people are too much disturbed by it." ublock and umatrix as well as other similarly named addons were (and continue to be) heavily shilled by an unknown group of people that seem to desperat

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Build Spyblock from uBlock Origin

I might agree only if these addons are extremely easy to add for a "normie" user back into GNU icecat as they choose. 1. normie downloads GNU icecat 2. normie clicks and downloads GNU icecat addons with a single click from the GNU icecat website 3. everyone is happy and nobody gets what they do n

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Build Spyblock from uBlock Origin

spyblock is an excellent addon. why in the world should we waste our effort adding a heavily shilled addon when we could focus our efforts to improve GNU icecat, and then make possible improvements (not that any are needed) to spyblock later? spyblock has never ever given me a si

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Build Spyblock from uBlock Origin

''uBlock Origin is theonlysolution." we have spyblock and that works great. why fix what isn't broken? why are you pushing this so hard? -- Securely sent with Tutanota. Claim your encrypted mailbox today! https://tutanota.com 22. Sep 2016 22:48 by sedov...@yandex.ru: >

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Build Spyblock from uBlock Origin

WARNING! ublock and other similary named addons have been shilled by (disinformation agents) on the internet like crazy in the past two years. it is not known why these "shills" want this but I will say this one thing. THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG WITH SPYBLOCK. that is why they want to kil

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Build Spyblock from uBlock Origin

https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md says: "For *support/discussions*, there is Mozilla Discourse . - https://discourse.mozilla-community.org/t/support-ublock-origin/6746"; I have not tried it but giv

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Build Spyblock from uBlock Origin

I see "ublock origin" has a built-in rule available for "no-remote-fonts". Does anybody know how to add a simple rule for "no remote anything"? Thanks. El 27/09/16 a les 01:28, mdn ha escrit: > Icecat is already limited by the number of volunteers, I would like to > volunteer but my capacities a

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Build Spyblock from uBlock Origin

Icecat is already limited by the number of volunteers, I would like to volunteer but my capacities are I think to limited to help on a technical level for now (if someone has spare time to teach me I have no problem with learning). Reusing software that works especially if they are under GPL is I t

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Build Spyblock from uBlock Origin

+1 El 23/09/16 a les 19:51, Ivan Zaigralin ha escrit: > Please do not take this as anything but constructive criticism. I fully > understand how limited the resources are, and I firmly believe that even > in the present state icecat & most of the bundled features are > incredibly useful and effec

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Build Spyblock from uBlock Origin

Please do not take this as anything but constructive criticism. I fully understand how limited the resources are, and I firmly believe that even in the present state icecat & most of the bundled features are incredibly useful and effective. I am merely trying to point out some directions for fut

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Build Spyblock from uBlock Origin

uBlock Origin a bit of a learning curve for Adblock Plus users but I do agree we should switch. But, more importantly, get out an updated, secure IceCat release before making feature enhancements. -- -Dan Q On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 09:48:36 +0700, Sedov Andrey wrote: > Adblock Plus began to dis

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Build Spyblock from uBlock Origin

Adblock Plus began to distribute advertising (Acceptable Ads Platform ) = Adblock Plus died. uBlock Origin is the only solution. 23.09.2016 08:56, David Hedlund пишет: I think it is time to build Spyblock from Adblock Plus (ABP) to uBlock Origin (uBO). Ad