Hello Chris,
sorry for the late reply.
> Issuing a \partCombineApart between two tied notes results in a
> warning that the tie is unterminated and omits the tie from the
> printed score. Printing the top part by itself creates the tie
> without issues.
>
> Omitting the tie from the top
The slash from the acciaccatura gets deported on all subsequent 8th flags.
Is this a known bug ?
\version "2.25.10"
\partCombine
{\acciaccatura {c''16 b'16} a'1| g'8 r r4 8 r8 8 8 | 8}
{\acciaccatura {f'16 g'} a'1 | e'8 r r4 8 r8 8 8 | 8}
Took me quite a while to figure what was goi
Timothy,
I'm looking into the issue. Does adding
\tagGroup #'($partCombine)
early in your score work around the problem?
—
Dan
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
On 12/10/2021 22:55, Dan Eble wrote:
Timothy,
I'm looking into the issue. Does adding
\tagGroup #'($partCombine)
early in your score work around the problem?
—
Dan
Yes, adding the \tagGroup does bring back the missing music.
--
Timothy Lanfear, Bristol, UK
Le 12/10/2021 à 22:31, Timothy Lanfear a écrit :
From at least 2.18 to 2.23.3, it was possible to place \tag and
\keepWithTag outside of \partCombine. Version 2.23.4 requires the
tagging inside \partCombine. I do have a lot of files expecting the
old behaviour.
\version "2
From at least 2.18 to 2.23.3, it was possible to place \tag and
\keepWithTag outside of \partCombine. Version 2.23.4 requires the
tagging inside \partCombine. I do have a lot of files expecting the old
behaviour.
\version "2.22.1"
{
\keepWithTag #'t \tag #'t \partCombin
Hello,
On 27/12/2020 08:52, Thomas Morley wrote:
the initial example works at least since 2.8.0 (yes, I've a working 2.8.0)
A long time...
Tbh, I couldn't figure why it works before 2.19.21, though, if it
doesn't anymore, it should be documented either as it is done for
\relative already or in
''2 \tag #'score f'' \tag #'part fis'' g''1 }
> > two = { e''2 d'' g'1 }
> >
> > \removeWithTag #'score \partCombine \one \two
> > %% end
> >
> > it looks like tags are not
> > respected for the length of `skip`, but both are counted, thus the
> >
On Dec 26, 2020, at 13:29, Thomas Morley wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> the following code gives bad output.
>
> %% Start
> \version "2.20.0"
>
> one = { e''2 \tag #'score f'' \tag #'part fis'' g''1 }
> two = { e''2 d'' g'1 }
>
> \removeWithTag #'score \par
Hi,
the following code gives bad output.
%% Start
\version "2.20.0"
one = { e''2 \tag #'score f'' \tag #'part fis'' g''1 }
two = { e''2 d'' g'1 }
\removeWithTag #'score \partCombine \one \two
%% end
Afaict, first bad commit is
commit 615571eda2393eba537c3ad0eb2d424f8dd218b0
Author
Am So., 30. Dez. 2018 um 12:00 Uhr schrieb Thomas Morley
:
>
> Am So., 30. Dez. 2018 um 11:06 Uhr schrieb Thomas Morley
> :
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > out of
> > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2018-12/msg00178.html
> >
> > The do
Am So., 30. Dez. 2018 um 11:06 Uhr schrieb Thomas Morley
:
>
> Hi,
>
> out of https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2018-12/msg00178.html
>
> The doc-tagged LSR-snippet "Two \partcombine pairs on one staff"
> http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=958
>
Hi,
out of https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2018-12/msg00178.html
The doc-tagged LSR-snippet "Two \partcombine pairs on one staff"
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=958
is obviously inspired by
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/1321/?page=1=25#a054
Whil
Hello,
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 08:44:56 +0200, Thomas Morley
wrote:
...
>
> Hi James,
>
> I've no clue why it happens, so I'd go for the symptom. Something like
> "partcombine warns erroneously for unterminated slur".
>
> Cheers,
> Harm
Many
2018-07-18 15:03 GMT+02:00 James Lowe :
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 09:09:15 +0200, Thomas Morley
> wrote:
>
>> 2018-07-17 11:55 GMT+02:00 Ben :
>> > Good morning,
>> >
>> > I've been reading up on partcombine recently and I wanted to tr
Hello,
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 09:09:15 +0200, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> 2018-07-17 11:55 GMT+02:00 Ben :
> > Good morning,
> >
> > I've been reading up on partcombine recently and I wanted to try out a few
> > examples from the documentation to help me really understand
2018-07-17 11:55 GMT+02:00 Ben :
> Good morning,
>
> I've been reading up on partcombine recently and I wanted to try out a few
> examples from the documentation to help me really understand the command,
> however I get this error with one example:
>
> From:
>
> ht
Thanks for your report.
This is an already known issue, see:
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/1823/
Cheers,
Harm
2017-09-25 20:51 GMT+02:00 Peter Häring :
>
> --
> Peter Häring
> Dürmentinger Str. 15, 88521 Ertingen
> Tel. 07371/129361
> Email:
quot; \stimmeII
%Parts, where the first note is not quoted,
% the second is quoted from above
instrumentI = \relative b' {
b1 |
\quoteDuring #"stI" { s1 }
}
instrumentII = \relative f' {
f1 |
\quoteDuring #"stII" { s1 }
}
% \partcombine works how it should for the parts
Hi,
thanks for the answer, but it still fails for a slightly more
complicated example:
\version "2.19.59"
\score {
\new Staff {
\set Staff.autoBeaming = ##f
\partcombine
\relative c' {
\time 3/4
\repeat tremolo 6 { c'16 [e16] }
c4 d e
c4 d e
}
"Ulrik Serges" <ul...@serges.dk> wrote in message
news:6fdb4c7d-1f9c-3dea-59dd-fc5293e1c...@serges.dk...
Hello,
I have problems using tremolo repeats with partcombine. The following code
returns errors and doesn't produce the correct output:
\version "2.19.65"
\n
Hello,
I have problems using tremolo repeats with partcombine. The following
code returns errors and doesn't produce the correct output:
\version "2.19.65"
\new Staff <<
\partcombine
\relative c' { \time 3/4 \repeat tremolo 6 {e16 g16} e2. }
\relative c' {
r = { \unfoldRepeats \four \bar "|." }
ufive = { \unfoldRepeats \five \bar "|." }
\markup { "\partcombing already unfolded music does work ..." }
\score {
\new ChoirStaff <<
\new Staff \ufour
\new Staff \ufive
\new Staff \partcombine \ufour
> For choral music it is an old convention to merge dynamics if time of start,
> time of end, and target are all identical.
I see. But wouldn't it be preference (style) rather than a bug? I
suppose you want that to be the default to merge most(all?) dynamics?
I used \partcombineChords in your
Hi Pierre-Luc!
Concerning "Bug1", I do not think the \< \mp should be merged. The part combine
in this section is using two voices. The notes are not connected. How would you know if the
hairpin is for voiceTwo *and* voiceOne?
For choral music it is an old convention to merge dynamics if
Hi Knut,
Concerning "Bug1",
I do not think the \< \mp should be merged. The part combine in this
section is using two voices. The notes are not connected. How would
you know if the hairpin is for voiceTwo *and* voiceOne?
--
Pierre-Luc Gauthier
___
t volta 2 { 4 4 4 4 } }
four = { a'4\p 4 4 4 2\< 2 4\mp 4 4 4 \repeat volta 2 { 4 4 4 4 } 1 4 4 4 4}
five = { d'4\p 4 4 4 4\< 4 4 4 4\mp 4 4 4 \repeat volta 2 { 4 4 4 4 } 1 4 4 4 4}
\markup { "\partcombine works as expected"}
\score {
\new Staff \partcombine \one \two
\la
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Kieren MacMillan <
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
> I see this is still a problem, so I thought I'd post it to -bug.
>
> %%% SNIPPET BEGINS
> \version "2.19.61"
>
> musicA = {
> g'1\> R1\!
> }
> musicB =
Hi all,
I see this is still a problem, so I thought I'd post it to -bug.
Regards,
Kieren.
%%% SNIPPET BEGINS
\version "2.19.61"
musicA = {
g'1\> R1\!
}
musicB = {
b'1\> R1\!
}
\new Staff \partcombine \musicA \musicB
%%% SNIPPET ENDS
can get \partcombine into really great shape.
It’s a wonderful tool, to the degree that it works.
Best,
Kieren.
On Sep 25, 2016, at 3:55 PM, Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org> wrote:
> Hi Kieren,
> no time to really look into it. But in
> https://git.openlilylib.org/bfsc/das-trunkne-l
Harm (et al.),
Right after hitting “Send”, I realized the fix: ye olde empty chord!
The version below seems to work fine in both MWE and — at least, on first
glance — in my RWS (real-world score).
Thanks!
Kieren.
%%% SNIPPET BEGINS
\version "2.19.48"
terminateHairpin =
Hi Harm,
> below a very bad workaround, found deep, deep in the quick n' dirty junk room.
Thanks for the attempt!
Works great on this MWE…
But in my real-world score, Lily’s long-standing \grace-timing “feature” (read:
bug) comes crashing down. =(
The hint/idea is possibly a good one,
gt;
>> SNIPPET BEGINS
>> \version "2.19.46"
>>
>> musicA = {
>> g'1\> R1\!
>> }
>> musicB = {
>> b'1\> R1\!
>> }
>>
>> \new Staff \partcombine \musicA \musicB
>> SNIPPET ENDS
>
I'm no
.46"
>>
>> musicA = {
>> g'1\> R1\!
>> }
>> musicB = {
>> b'1\> R1\!
>> }
>>
>> \new Staff \partcombine \musicA \musicB
>> SNIPPET ENDS
>
>
>Kieren MacMillan, composer
>‣ websi
, “viable” does NOT include pulling all dynamics out of every
part and putting them in separate dynamics variables to be simultaneous-ed in
post-hoc…
> SNIPPET BEGINS
> \version "2.19.46"
>
> musicA = {
> g'1\> R1\!
> }
> musicB = {
> b'1\> R1\!
Hello Gilberto,
On 27.10.2015 13:43, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
- no. 1: when two parts contain manual beams and slurs at the same
point and one uses \partcombine, some warnings are outputs in the
console: "unterminated beam" and "unterminated slur". It does output
the mu
Thanks a lot.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/three-small-bugs-tp182794p182984.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
Dan Eble writes:
> Simon Albrecht mail.de> writes:
>
>> On 18.10.2015 13:25, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
>> > Hi Simon,
>> >
>> > Thanks for the reply. I am not sure I understand your answer, do you
>> > mean that in the tiny example I created I should simply have used a
>> >
Simon Albrecht mail.de> writes:
> On 18.10.2015 13:25, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > Thanks for the reply. I am not sure I understand your answer, do you
> > mean that in the tiny example I created I should simply have used a
> > "Solo I" indication in the fourth bar instead
I forgot to mention: You can change this indication using
\layout {
\context {
\Voice
soloText = "Solo I"
}
}
– at least I might like that better.
the output should be at least equal
Agreed.
\version "2.19.28"
{
\partcombine
{R1 | \partcombineApart r2 b' |
tcombineApart command is at the same
position as the R1*N:
\version "2.19.28"
{
\partcombine
{\partcombineApart r2 b'2~ | 1 | \partcombineAutomatic c''1 |}
{R1*2 | f'1 |}
}
Which outputs this (no solos, no single voice, just two voices apart as
expected, regardless of full mea
priate to change the input code of either of the voices to make
> up for deficiencies of the partcombiner – at least if you should need to
> print both separately, and that’s part of the point in using
\partcombine.
Best,
Gilberto
On 17/10/15 20:30, Simon Albrecht wrote:
Hello Gilbert
On 18.10.2015 13:25, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
Hi Simon,
Thanks for the reply. I am not sure I understand your answer, do you
mean that in the tiny example I created I should simply have used a
"Solo I" indication in the fourth bar instead of using rests?
No, the solo indication should be
howing that the second voice
is silent.
Yours, Simon
On 14.10.2015 21:15, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
Hello all,
I get strange results when I change the type of \partcombine (for
instance, using \partcombineApart) when one of the parts is in the
middle of a several bars long multi-measure rest:
http://li
Hello all,
I get strange results when I change the type of \partcombine (for
instance, using \partcombineApart) when one of the parts is in the
middle of a several bars long multi-measure rest:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n182372/39.png
code
Malte,
On 13/08/15 21:42, Malte Meyn wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> the case of the ‘c’ in partcombine is inconsistent, confusing me every
> time I use \partcombine(Apart|Chords|…):
>
> \partcombine, \partcombineApart, … but
> \partCombineTextsOnNote, \partCombineListener
>
>
2nd note should be marked Solo. Instead, both the note and the full measure
rest appear.Do you think this might be related to issues 4095 and 4454?
\version 2.19.25
one = \relative c' { c1\ | f\mf }
two = \relative c' { c1\ | R\! | }
\score {
\new Staff { \partcombine \one \two
Hi list,
the case of the ‘c’ in partcombine is inconsistent, confusing me every
time I use \partcombine(Apart|Chords|…):
\partcombine, \partcombineApart, … but
\partCombineTextsOnNote, \partCombineListener
I would suggest to change all occurences of ‘partcombine’ to ‘partCombine’.
Why
I was looking into the bug again and noticed something. If we include a note
before that code the problem doesn't appear
mus = \relative { b1 b'1\ 1\ 1\ 1\!}
\score { \new Staff \partcombine \mus \mus}
However, if we write a second voice that does a different thing the problem
appears
the problem doesn't appear
mus = \relative {
b1
b'1\
1\
1\
1\!
}
\score {
\new Staff \partcombine \mus \mus
}
However, if we write a second voice that does a different thing the
problem appears again.
mus = \relative {
b1
b'1\
1\
1\
1\!
}
musTwo = \relative {
b1
b'1\
1
something. If we include
a note before that code the problem doesn't appear
mus = \relative {
b1
b'1\
1\
1\
1\!
}
\score {
\new Staff \partcombine \mus \mus
}
However, if we write a second voice that does a different thing the
problem appears again.
mus = \relative {
b1
b'1
Am 22.06.2015 um 13:46 schrieb Miguel Jesus:
I was looking into the bug again and noticed something. If we include
a note before that code the problem doesn't appear
mus = \relative {
b1
b'1\
1\
1\
1\!
}
\score {
\new Staff \partcombine \mus \mus
}
However, if we write a second
Thank you, Simon. Next time I'll have a little more patience before I report a
bug. On Wednesday, 17 June 2015, 15:46, Simon Albrecht
simon.albre...@mail.de wrote:
Hello Miguel,
Am 17.06.2015 um 14:14 schrieb Miguel Jesus:
I'm having a problem with \partcombine (I'm sorry
I'm having a problem with \partcombine (I'm sorry for the long examples but
this is the code I'm working with right now). With this code the voices
aren't combined properly:
\language portugues
\version 2.18.0
\layout { \context { \Score skipBars = ##t }}
bassoonOneFileOne = \relative re
Hello Miguel,
Am 17.06.2015 um 14:14 schrieb Miguel Jesus:
I'm having a problem with \partcombine (I'm sorry for the long examples but
this is the code I'm working with right now). With this code the voices
aren't combined properly:
[snip]
At first I thought it had to do with the spacer
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 07:36:30AM +0100, James Lowe wrote:
On 15/05/15 22:38, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
% - Note: this is not the same as issue 913; padding the first voice
% to have the same length as the second does not change the wrong
% tuple bracket.
[...]
Is this just another
James Lowe pkx at gnu.org writes:
On 15/05/15 22:38, H. S. Teoh wrote:
% The triplet in the first argument to \partcombine is wrongly
% formatted in the output; the tuplet bracket only spans the two quarter
% rests, whereas it should span both rests and the single note.
%
% - Note
On 15/05/15 22:38, H. S. Teoh wrote:
% The triplet in the first argument to \partcombine is wrongly
% formatted in the output; the tuplet bracket only spans the two quarter
% rests, whereas it should span both rests and the single note.
%
% - Note: this is not the same as issue 913; padding
% The triplet in the first argument to \partcombine is wrongly
% formatted in the output; the tuplet bracket only spans the two quarter
% rests, whereas it should span both rests and the single note.
%
% - Note: this is not the same as issue 913; padding the first voice
% to have the same length
H. S. Teoh hsteoh at quickfur.ath.cx writes:
% Arguably, using \tag with \partcombine is a bad idea, since it can
% easily result in constructs that are probably not representable in a
% way that would make a subsequent \removeWithTag work correctly, but
% Lilypond should at least give
% \partcombine should have produced a combined staff containing d'1 in
% the first bar, f'1 in the second and 3rd bars, and f' d'1 chords in
% the next 2 bars. However, it seems to interact badly with \tag, and
% the output has a missing f1' in the second bar, a stray rest in the
% 3rd bar
H. S. Teoh hsteoh at quickfur.ath.cx writes:
\score {
\removeWithTag #'midi {
\partcombine \fluteIPart \fluteIIPart
}
}
Have you tried filtering before combining?
\partcombine \removeWithTag #'midi \fluteIPart \removeWithTag #'midi
\fluteIIPart
--
Dan
On Mar 14, 2015, at 07:05 , James Lowe p...@gnu.org wrote:
On 14/03/15 04:34, Dan Eble wrote:
\version 2.19.16
\score {
\partcombine
\relative { e'' e e c' }
\relative { b'~ b \glissando e, g }
}
Is this related to
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1321
Dan Eble d...@faithful.be writes:
\version 2.19.16
\score {
\partcombine
\relative { c''1 | }
\relative { a'2. f4 }
}
That's issue 100
URL:https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=100.
--
David Kastrup
___
bug-lilypond
On 14/03/15 04:34, Dan Eble wrote:
\version 2.19.16
\score {
\partcombine
\relative { e'' e e c' }
\relative { b'~ b \glissando e, g }
}
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo
\version 2.19.16
\score {
\partcombine
\relative { c''1 | }
\relative { a'2. f4 }
}
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
\version 2.19.16
\score {
\partcombine
\relative { e'' e e c' }
\relative { b'~ b \glissando e, g }
}
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Hi,
I encountered a strange crash that is related to enharmonic ties.
I'm using an engraver that is passed a grob.
One particular snippet of input code lets now crash LilyPond.
I can't easily produce a compiling (i.e. crashing) example because it's
quite intertwined with project specific
Hi Urs,
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 6:01 AM, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote:
Hi,
I encountered a strange crash that is related to enharmonic ties.
I'm using an engraver that is passed a grob.
One particular snippet of input code lets now crash LilyPond.
I can't easily produce a
Am 28.10.2014 04:33, schrieb Dan Eble:
Urs Liska ul at openlilylib.org writes:
Hi all,
I'm experiencing an issue with \partcombine.
Consider the attached snippet and image.
When there is an acciaccatura in one of the voices the trill spanner
doesn't stop in the \partcombine-d voice
Hi all,
I'm experiencing an issue with \partcombine.
Consider the attached snippet and image.
When there is an acciaccatura in one of the voices the trill spanner
doesn't stop in the \partcombine-d voice.
It doesn't matter in which voice the acciaccatura is. \appoggiatura has
the same
Urs Liska ul at openlilylib.org writes:
Hi all,
I'm experiencing an issue with \partcombine.
Consider the attached snippet and image.
When there is an acciaccatura in one of the voices the trill spanner
doesn't stop in the \partcombine-d voice.
It doesn't matter in which voice
.
This is verse one
It is more fun
}
verseTwo = \lyricmode {
\set stanza = #2.
This is verse two
It's good for you
}
\score {
\new ChoirStaff
\new Staff {
\key d \major
\new NullVoice = aligner \soprano
\new Voice = upper \partcombine \soprano \alto
2014-02-28 11:54 GMT+01:00 Ed Gordijn ed.klari...@gmail.com:
Hi Pierre,
The scheme code is no longer needed, you can get the same result with the
attached file using standard syntax. I don't no if this makes the snippet
obsolete. The use of NullVoice is well documented so what remains is the
Dear Squad,
The following snippet :
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=653
from Carl Sorensen (see :
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/hymns-chords-vs-voices-td41309.html)
Does not compile on v2.18 nor v2.16
Terminal says :
../all/hymn-template-for-per-voice-music-and--partcombine.ly:7:23:
Hi,
Using partcombine with a silent second voice (full rests r1 or R1) and
the first voice starts on the last beat. It moves the quarter rest up.
\version 2.18.0
musicI = { r2 r4 c''| c''1 }
musicII = { r1 | r1 }
\partcombine \musicI \musicII
I posted this on the user list and Karol
hi Karol
anyway - I've entered a new issue in the tracker - thanks for your report!
Eluze
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3612thanks=3612ts=1381827371
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/partcombine-bug-missplaced-rest-tp152312p152328
Missplaced rest when notes are tied.
\version 2.17.28
first = {
c'1
d'1~
d'1
R1*4/4
}
second = {
R1*4/4*4
}
\score {
\new Staff
\partcombine
\first
\second
}
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https
Karol Majewski-2 wrote
Missplaced rest when notes are tied.
please reduce your example to a tiny size - eg. 4/4 = 1 … !
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/partcombine-bug-missplaced-rest-tp152312p152319.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive
insert the command
/\partcombineChords/ just before the /\quoteDuring/ in the part, the
partcombine then works as intended.
So in your attached example, replace the line
/fluteIINotes = { r4 \quoteDuring #violin2 { s2 } r4 | }/
with the line:
/fluteIINotes = { \partcombineChords r4 \quoteDuring
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 4:41 AM, Eluze elu...@gmail.com wrote:
reported in the French community
http://lilypond-french-users.1298960.n2.nabble.com/Probleme-avec-repeat-tremolo-en-partcombine-tp7579661.html
I couldn't find this in the many issues about \partcombine
you can circumvent
reported in the French community
http://lilypond-french-users.1298960.n2.nabble.com/Probleme-avec-repeat-tremolo-en-partcombine-tp7579661.html
I couldn't find this in the many issues about \partcombine
you can circumvent this problem by adding explicit beaming in both voices
for the critical
I'm not top posting!
SacredHarpHeads aren't displayed in partcombine sections when the second part is
at a higher pitch than the first part.
\version 2.17.7
\key a \minor
\partcombine
\relative a' { \sacredHarpHeadsMinor a4 c4 a4 c4 }
\relative a' { \sacredHarpHeadsMinor a4 a4 c4 c4
Steve Tarr wrote
SacredHarpHeads aren't displayed in partcombine sections when the second
part is
at a higher pitch than the first part.
\version 2.17.7
\key a \minor
\partcombine
\relative a' { \sacredHarpHeadsMinor a4 c4 a4 c4 }
\relative a' { \sacredHarpHeadsMinor a4 a4 c4
in the way that I want. Expanding
the example to show the three different approaches that I've tried:
\version 2.17.7
PartOne = \relative a' { \sacredHarpHeads a4 c4 a4 c4 }
PartTwo = \relative a' { \sacredHarpHeads a4 a4 c4 c4 }
\partcombine \PartOne \PartTwo
\PartOne \\ \PartTwo
\new Staff
Hello Steve,
2012/11/28 Steve Tarr stevet19...@comcast.net
If I use explicit voices for each part, the stem directions are handled
independently for each voice so I lose the information that the voices are
crossing over each other. (And I get warning messages about note
collisions
when I
as in my second
example using ... \\ ... (as it should, since one is just a
shortcut for the other). That is, I see both up and down stems on the
unison first and fourth notes; they're not merged to a single note and
stem as partcombine does.
My larger goal is to highlight the differences
Hello,
2012/11/28 Steve Tarr stevet19...@comcast.net
SacredHarpHeads aren't displayed in partcombine sections when the second
part is
at a higher pitch than the first part.
\version 2.17.7
\key a \minor
\partcombine
\relative a' { \sacredHarpHeadsMinor a4 c4 a4 c4 }
\relative
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 04:01:48PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
In the attached minimal example I explicitly call \partcombineApart
to force two separate voice. However, the partcombiner still detects
the second quarter as SoloII. The correct solution would be to use
automatically forced
{
\partcombine \IVDuettFagIMusic \IVDuettFagIIMusic
}
% WORKAROUND: Explicitly force the second quarter as Apart, too. This is
cumbersome and should NOT be required:
IVDuettFagIIMusicWorkaround = \relative f
Hello list,
I meet a buglet in partcombine: a slur is drawn across a rest when it
shouldn't. This happens with 2.15.40 on ubuntu-64bit. The bug doesn't
occur with 2.14.
I attach a hopefully minimal example.
Rutger
\version 2.15.40
obI = {
\key d \major
\relative c'' {
g4( fis g
Hi Rutger,
This isn't a critical regression, there are some new \partcombine*
commands Reinhold supplied for getting round these restrictions using
\partcombine.
Your code should have given you a warning of this sort:
/home/ian/Dropbox/MusicScoresDevelopment/Testpartcombine.ly:26:10:
warning
Rutger Hofman rut...@cs.vu.nl writes:
Hello list,
I meet a buglet in partcombine: a slur is drawn across a rest when it
shouldn't. This happens with 2.15.40 on ubuntu-64bit. The bug doesn't
occur with 2.14.
I attach a hopefully minimal example.
Since 2.15.40 the following highly relevant
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Rutger Hofman rut...@cs.vu.nl writes:
Hello list,
I meet a buglet in partcombine: a slur is drawn across a rest when it
shouldn't. This happens with 2.15.40 on ubuntu-64bit. The bug doesn't
occur with 2.14.
I attach a hopefully minimal example.
Since
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 01:39:39PM +0200, Rutger Hofman wrote:
Hello list,
I meet a buglet in partcombine: a slur is drawn across a rest when
it shouldn't. This happens with 2.15.40 on ubuntu-64bit. The bug
doesn't occur with 2.14.
I attach a hopefully minimal example.
Thanks
On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:49:33 -0700, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
Part-combining [...] LilyPond starts two slurs and lets one continue too long.
Thank you, this has been entered as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2584
slurs and lets one continue too long.
\version 2.15.39
\partcombine
{e'2( f'4 g') g'2( f')}
{c'2( f'4 g') e'2( d')}
% Workarounds:
% Prevent the part-combiner from switching states during the slur
\partcombine
{\partcombineChords e'2( f'4 g') \partcombineAutomatic g'2( f')}
{c'2( f'4 g') e'2
lilyp...@googlecode.com wrote in message
news:8-9567054385019064696-16094765952880031725-lilypond=googlecode@googlecode.com...
Comment #8 on issue 1967 by gra...@percival-music.ca: \partcombine and
slurs produce misleading warnings (when combining into chords)
http://code.google.com/p
Comment #7 on issue 1967 by d...@gnu.org: \partcombine and slurs produce
misleading warnings (when combining into chords)
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1967
I've checked with an old Ubuntu binary install. 2.12.thelatest does not
have the problem. 2.14.thelatest _has_
Comment #8 on issue 1967 by gra...@percival-music.ca: \partcombine and
slurs produce misleading warnings (when combining into chords)
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1967
I agree that this doesn't seem to have anything to do with EventChord
changes, so of course David
1 - 100 of 266 matches
Mail list logo