"Phil Holmes" wrote in message
news:nfnceh$ob7$1...@ger.gmane.org...
"David Kastrup" wrote in message
news:87mvog3f7z@fencepost.gnu.org...
Thomas Morley writes:
2016-04-26 10:53 GMT+02:00 Phil Holmes :
2016-04-26 12:04 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
>> 2016-04-26 11:13 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
>>> Thomas Morley writes:
>>>
2016-04-26 10:53 GMT+02:00 Phil Holmes :
Thomas Morley writes:
> 2016-04-26 11:13 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
>> Thomas Morley writes:
>>
>>> 2016-04-26 10:53 GMT+02:00 Phil Holmes :
Why do you say that expected behaviour is to force the dynamic
"David Kastrup" wrote in message
news:87mvog3f7z@fencepost.gnu.org...
Thomas Morley writes:
2016-04-26 10:53 GMT+02:00 Phil Holmes :
Why do you say that expected behaviour is to force the dynamic down?
Moving
the note is
2016-04-26 11:13 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
>> 2016-04-26 10:53 GMT+02:00 Phil Holmes :
>>> Why do you say that expected behaviour is to force the dynamic down? Moving
>>> the note is potentially equally valid
Thomas Morley writes:
> 2016-04-26 10:53 GMT+02:00 Phil Holmes :
>> Why do you say that expected behaviour is to force the dynamic down? Moving
>> the note is potentially equally valid behavior, depending on the
>> typesetter's preference.
>
> It's
Graham King writes:
> First, an apology to the developers, and in particular to Harm, for my
> previous, hasty, attempt to report this in March, which must have
> appeared selfishly peremptory. Fortunately the message seems not to
> have reached this list and, now that
Why do you say that expected behaviour is to force the dynamic down? Moving
the note is potentially equally valid behavior, depending on the
typesetter's preference.
--
Phil Holmes
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org