Hi,
I don’t know the internals enough, but isn’t it plausible that things
like finding the optimal line break etc. have a n² complexity
("squared"). That fits quite well to your data points ("Simon").
Fortunately it does not seem to be exponential ("exp")...
Joram
A bit few data points to make that kind of conclusion, isn't it?
However, using
For ($x=10; $x -le 1000; $x+=10) {
$duration=Measure-Command { echo "\version ""2.18.2"" { \time 3/8 s4.*$x }"
| lilypond - }
echo $x, $duration.TotalSeconds >> result.txt
}
I get this figure:
Definitely looks quadr
Well, that’s the eye of a data analyst ;)
No, seriously, nice plot! I expected a relatively smooth curve,
therefore a few data points get you already quite far. My main point was
to state that it does not look very exponential.
If you really want to do it right, you should probably constrain the
Noeck wrote
> I don’t know the internals enough, but isn’t it plausible that things
> like finding the optimal line break etc. have a n² complexity
> ("squared").
Hi Joram,
On the one hand, that sounds plausible, underpinned by David's evaluations.
But I find it very interesting that it takes sig
Passing 600, it's actually starting to look more exponential than
quadratic, but I'll wait until tonight to make more analysis.
A thought would be that an empty bar leaves more freedom for the compiler.
It probably has more rules about what it's allowed to do to bars with
certain content, but the
This is an extremely interesting discussion. but given that when there are
non-empty objects present it does not appear to arise. is it simply an
'academic' corner case of purely theoretical interest?
Or perhaps it matters for engraving 4'33' by John Cage. [I believe one
version of the score is av
Torsten Hämmerle writes:
> Noeck wrote
>> I don’t know the internals enough, but isn’t it plausible that things
>> like finding the optimal line break etc. have a n² complexity
>> ("squared").
>
> Hi Joram,
>
> On the one hand, that sounds plausible, underpinned by David's evaluations.
> But I fi
On 07.04.2018 13:42, Andrew Bernard wrote:
given that when there are
non-empty objects present it does not appear to arise. is it simply an
'academic' corner case of purely theoretical interest?
It happens in intermediary stages of work. I stumbled upon the problem
when I started engraving a n
2018-04-07 14:57 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht :
> On 07.04.2018 13:42, Andrew Bernard wrote:
>>
>> given that when there are
>> non-empty objects present it does not appear to arise. is it simply an
>> 'academic' corner case of purely theoretical interest?
>
>
> It happens in intermediary stages of wor
