Re: GNU make 3.99.93 release candidate is available

2013-10-01 Thread Stephan Beal
2 errors generated. Makefile:75: recipe for target 'obj/fsl_vfile.o' failed (Not a problem, of course, but wasn't sure which version your comment assumes is the basis for comparison.) PS: i like that the line number is now shown! -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan

Re: bug? $(warning)/$(error) evaluated from inside a comment in a 'define'?

2007-06-20 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wednesday 20 June 2007, Philip Guenther wrote: On 6/19/07, Stephan Beal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, so you've defined a variable, 'bogo', whose value consists of two lines, the first of which has a '#' as its first non-whitespace character. It isn't a comment at that point, it's just

Re: bug? $(warning)/$(error) evaluated from inside a comment in a 'define'?

2007-06-20 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wednesday 20 June 2007, Paul Smith wrote: the variable being defined. In fact nothing is parsed inside a define. I'm not sure, from your message, if this is what you feel is the surprising behavior; Right - that's what surprised me. i assumed that comments were skipped during the

bug? $(warning)/$(error) evaluated from inside a comment in a 'define'?

2007-06-19 Thread Stephan Beal
Hi, Makers! i just discovered a Make behaviour which really surprises me. While that in itself is nothing new ;), this one certainly violates the principal of least astonishment: When a $(warning) or $(error) is inside a 'define', it is evaluated even if it is part of a comment. A

Fwd: make: you guys are gawds

2001-05-09 Thread Stephan Beal
Please excuse the non-bug post to bug-make@..., but I didn't find another address for the make tool, and 'make@' bounced... -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: make: you guys are gawds Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 17:04:06 +0200 From: Stephan Beal [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED