Re: 014: SECURITY FIX: December 9, 2014

2015-03-22 Thread Bob Beck
Indeed. Understand that patches are signed using an offline key. It does not speak to the internet. We are not invoking a manual process to change a minor typo, and have even one person lose any sleep over repatching systems because the patch signature changed. While I realize it may offend you

Re: 014: SECURITY FIX: December 9, 2014

2015-03-22 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 09:51:10AM -0600, Bob Beck wrote: Indeed. Understand that patches are signed using an offline key. It does not speak to the internet. We are not invoking a manual process to change a minor typo, and have even one person lose any sleep over repatching systems because

Re: 014: SECURITY FIX: December 9, 2014

2015-03-22 Thread Martin Haufschild
No problem, I just wondered for no reaction after the first time I wrote the email. If I could, I would correct the typo myself. I didn't have the patch signature in mind. That indeed makes it a little bit complicated and I confirm it's not worth the time. Nonetheless, thank you (the complete