Re: documentation: ipsec man page reference about manual SAs incorrect

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 07:52:58PM -0500, Paul Gorman wrote: > The OpenBSD 5.6 ipsec man page says: > > Further information on manual SA establishment is described in > ipsecctl(8). > > ipsecctl(8) does not mention manual SA establishment. Manual SAs are > instead covered in ipsec.conf(5). f

Re: documentation error in man page

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:23:08AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2015/01/13 07:08, Jason McIntyre wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 12:13:09AM -0700, Shane Manjarres wrote: > > > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi/OpenBSD-current/man5/unbound.conf.5?query=un

Re: documentation error in man page

On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 12:13:09AM -0700, Shane Manjarres wrote: > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi/OpenBSD-current/man5/unbound.conf.5?query=unbound%2econf&sec=5 > > uncounf.conf(5) > > > In Openbsd the default directory for unbound.conf file is /var/unbound/etc/ > > but in the man page

Re: [PATCH] monopoly game, typo in community chest card

On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 08:30:20PM +0100, Krzysztof Warzecha wrote: > Hello, > > I think there is typo in community chest card in monopoly game > (OpenBSD 5.6). The card in question says: > > Advance to the nearest Utility. > If unowned, you may buy it from the bank. > If owned, throw

Re: documentation: daily(8)

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 06:50:41PM -0700, flesheno...@gmail.com wrote: > >Synopsis:daily(8) is inaccurate regarding /altroot > >Category:documentation > >Environment: > System : OpenBSD 5.6 > Details : OpenBSD 5.6 (GENERIC) #310: Fri Aug 8 00:14:24 MDT 2014 >

Re: fortune(6) attribute

On Sat, Dec 06, 2014 at 09:26:39AM +0001, Jason McIntyre wrote: > hi! chasing down netbsd pr 49451: > > http://marc.info/?l=netbsd-bugs&m=14121109930 > > they've basically added an attribute to the following quote: > > Any sufficiently advanced t

fortune(6) attribute

hi! chasing down netbsd pr 49451: http://marc.info/?l=netbsd-bugs&m=14121109930 they've basically added an attribute to the following quote: Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo. -- Andy Finkel, Commodore-Amiga I

Re: error in man page find(1)

On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 03:19:41PM +0001, Jason McIntyre wrote: > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 03:55:08AM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 07:40, Jason McIntyre wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:03:01AM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > > >> Hi

Re: error in man page find(1)

On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 03:55:08AM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 07:40, Jason McIntyre wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:03:01AM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > >> Hi Ted, > >> > >> Ted Unangst wrote on Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 05:41:41PM

Re: error in man page find(1)

On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:03:01AM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > Hi Ted, > > Ted Unangst wrote on Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 05:41:41PM -0500: > > > Here's a revised diff against current. It just notes that the > > extension spellings are such. > > I'm OK with that, discouraging gratuitiously non-stan

Re: error in man page find(1)

On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 05:41:41PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: > On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 15:12, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > >> > >>If you think my diff is too wordy, we could move the text around a > >>bit, perhaps later in the section and say "-and and -or are > >>alternatives to -a and -o" or such. >

Re: error in man page find(1)

On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 05:09:08PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: > On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 20:36, Jason McIntyre wrote: > > > > > i think in the past some developers expressed a desire to not demote > > -and and -or, as they are traditional bsd. i think we changed the >

Re: error in man page find(1)

On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 03:26:04PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: > On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 19:41, Jason McIntyre wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 07:12:06PM +, Yon wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> in the OPERATORS section of find(1) the non POSIX forms "-or

Re: error in man page find(1)

On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 07:12:06PM +, Yon wrote: > Hi, > > in the OPERATORS section of find(1) the non POSIX forms "-or" and "-and" > are described, but they should be replaced by the POSIX forms "-o" and > "-a" (which are used in the examples, but not documented). > > Perhaps a mention that

Re: Correct description of kn_encode_base64() in keynote(3)

On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 04:19:44PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote: > The description of kn_encode_base64() in keynote(3) is inaccurate: > Since the function is a simple wrapper around b64_ntop(), > there is no restriction on the possible lengths of the raw data in > `src'. This is likely a confusion wi

Re: mountd -n doesn't work

On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 05:30:55AM -0700, Julian Hsiao wrote: > Hi, > > In the man page for mountd(8), it states that with the "-n" option it > would "...not require that clients make mount requests from reserved > ports." However, you still can't connect from non-reserved ports > because nfsrv_f

Re: Typo in ldapd.conf man page

On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 06:00:08PM +0200, ro...@dylanharris.org wrote: > >Synopsis:Wrong RFC referenced in ldapd.conf man page > >Category:documentation > >Environment: > System : OpenBSD 5.5 > Details : OpenBSD 5.5 (GENERIC) #276: Wed Mar 5 09:57:06 MST 2014 >

Re: less regression

On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:33:32AM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > Hi Ted, > > Ted Unangst wrote on Sun, May 11, 2014 at 02:51:10PM -0400: > > > since the less update, man doesn't behave the same. > > Not since the less update, but since > > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/less/

Re: ps(1) does not support -A, -o comm=foo

On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 03:13:24AM +0300, Lauri Tirkkonen wrote: > On Tue, Oct 22 2013 22:07:37 +0059, Jason McIntyre wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 08:37:06PM +0300, loth...@iki.fi wrote: > > > >Synopsis:ps(1) does not support -A, -o comm=foo > &g

Re: ps(1) does not support -A, -o comm=foo

On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 08:37:06PM +0300, loth...@iki.fi wrote: > >Synopsis:ps(1) does not support -A, -o comm=foo > >Category:user > >Environment: > System : OpenBSD 5.3 > Details : OpenBSD 5.3 (GENERIC) #50: Tue Mar 12 18:35:23 MDT 2013 > > der

Re: Trivial installation doc inconsistency that does NOT affect doc correctness found in OpenBSD 5.3 amd64 doc

On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 04:27:33PM -0600, Ryan wrote: > I noticed the following inconsistency in the OpenBSD 5.3 amd64 > documentation. I believe this inconsistency does NOT affect the > correctness of the installation instructions. > > The OpenBSD 5.3 installation documentation on page [ > http:

Re: documentation

On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 09:08:24AM +1000, m...@catit.mobi wrote: > >Synopsis:typo in smtpd.conf manpage > >Category:SMTPD > >Environment: > System : OpenBSD 5.3 > Details : OpenBSD 5.3 (GENERIC) #0: Fri May 31 18:00:57 EST 2013 > > r...@lighty.ca

Re: qt references /ussr/ ... iinstead of /usr/ ... in man.conf

On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 12:35:31PM -0500, Luke Small wrote: > -Luke > there's no qt in man.conf. i suspect you've added it yourself, incorrectly. unless some port does this when installing... jmc

Re: Wrong information in manual pages for booting softraid volumes

On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 11:15:28AM +0200, Lars Engblom wrote: > After reading http://verb.bz/installing-openbsd-using-softraid/ and > http://blog.cochard.me/2012/03/openbsd-51-installation-on-sofraid4.html > and http://www.undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20111002154251 it is > clear OpenBSD

Re: undocumented flags in dig

On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:58:37AM +0100, Martijn van Duren wrote: > Hello bugs, > > Today I made a type-o by typing dig -mx instead of dig -t mx. I was > shocked to find a complete trace on my screen. After some small testing > I found that the -m option is to enable memory debugging. When lookin

Re: smptd.conf man page

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 07:47:50AM +0001, Jason McIntyre wrote: > > there is currently some overlap because we have both smtpd and sendmail > in base. you're looking at the sendmail page, and smtpd.conf(5) is > referring to smtpd's makemap(8) page. > > now, i&#x

Re: smptd.conf man page

On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 07:29:10PM +0100, Dylan Harris wrote: > Here's a very minor documentation issue. The first example in the smtpd.conf > man page includes this section: > ># touch /etc/mail/secrets ># chmod 640 /etc/mail/secrets ># chown root:_smtpd /etc/

Re: Typo in style(9) manpage

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 04:26:17PM +0200, Rares Aioanei wrote: > I found the following text on my 5.2 (release, i386) machine: > > "Enumeration values are all uppercase. > enum enumtype {ONE, TWO} et;" > ^^ > can you explain what the prob

Re: I found a 14-year old bug.

On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 01:20:29PM +0100, Peter wrote: > Hi OpenBSD developers! > > I was logging in to a OpenBSD vm at work. It looked like this: > > peter@flappie ~ $ ssh root@172.16.2.199 > root@172.16.2.199's password: > Last login: Wed Nov 21 11:06:01 2012 > OpenBSD 4.7 (GENERIC.MP) #130: We

Re: usleep(3) manual error

On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 05:00:11PM +0200, Erik Lax wrote: > Hi, > > The manual of usleep(3) states that a usleep() greater than 1,000,000 > microseconds shall fail and return -1. However it does not. > > [EINVAL] /microseconds/ specified a value of 1,000,000 or more >

Re: domainname.1 patch

On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:25:44PM -0400, Chad Gross wrote: > In addition to the error that was found in defaultdomain.5, a similar > update is also needed for domainname.1. The diff below reflects the > change from netstart(8) to rc(8) that occurred between 5.0 -> 5.1: > fixed, thanks. jmc > >

Re: Error in defaultdomain.5

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 02:50:07PM -0400, Chad Gross wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Jiri B wrote: > > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 01:38:30PM -0400, Chad Gross wrote: > >> It looks like 5.1 introduced a change in where /etc/defaultdomain gets > >> read (netstart(8) vs rc(8)), but the man pag

Re: getnewvnode(9) man page is wrong, it describes an out-of-date version of prototype

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 06:26:58PM -0500, David Matthew Mattli wrote: > >Synopsis:getnewvnode(9) man page is wrong, it describes an out-of-date > >version of prototype > >Category:documentation > >Environment: > System : OpenBSD 5.1 > Details : OpenBSD 5.1-current (GEN

Re: Minor documentation error in -p option of userdel(8)

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 01:53:08PM +0100, Stefan Pettersson wrote: > Hi, > > just a minor thing. The userdel(8) usage and manual says the -p option > only needs the preserve-value when -D is given. However, a "true" > value seems to be required regardless: > > # userdel -p josefine > usage: userd

Re: Minor documentation error in -p option of userdel(8)

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 01:53:08PM +0100, Stefan Pettersson wrote: > Hi, > > just a minor thing. The userdel(8) usage and manual says the -p option > only needs the preserve-value when -D is given. However, a "true" > value seems to be required regardless: > > # userdel -p josefine > usage: userd

Re: kern.bufcachepercent=20 inconsistent with documentation (10%)

On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 09:54:37PM +0300, Juha Erkkila wrote: > The default value for kern.bufcachepercent sysctl-variable is now > 20 percent, but the documentation for sysctl(3) still claims it is > 10%. > fixed, thanks. jmc > Index: lib/libc/gen/sysctl.3 >

Re: pkg_subst(1) typo

On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 09:54:38AM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, Jason McIntyre wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 11:14:14PM -0400, Mike Small wrote: > > > The name and the synopsis disagree on whether to use hyphe

Re: pkg_subst(1) typo

On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 11:14:14PM -0400, Mike Small wrote: > The name and the synopsis disagree on whether to use hyphen or > underscore... > > > > PKG_SUBST(1) OpenBSD Reference Manual PKG_SUBST(1) > > NAME > pkg_subst - substitute variables' values in files >

Re: documentation/6641: sshd(8) docs say they will output /etc/nologin contents, but no contents are output

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 06:24:58PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote: > On Wed, 29 Jun 2011, sam...@silenceisdefeat.com wrote: > > > >Synopsis: sshd(8) docs say they will output /etc/nologin contents, > > >but no contents are output > > > I tried this on this machine, which is many configuratio

Re: A few manpage fixes for ktrace

On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:37:32AM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:32:00AM +0200, Cl??ment B??sch wrote: > > -- > > ClC)ment B. > > --- ktrace.1.orig 2007-05-31 21:20:11.0 +0200 > > +++ ktrace.12011-06-24 11:28:13.5236955

Re: A few manpage fixes for ktrace

On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:32:00AM +0200, Cl??ment B??sch wrote: > -- > ClC)ment B. > --- ktrace.1.orig 2007-05-31 21:20:11.0 +0200 > +++ ktrace.1 2011-06-24 11:28:13.523695570 +0200 > @@ -55,8 +55,8 @@ > unless overridden by the > .Fl f > option. > -The kernel operations that are

Re: A few manpage fixes for ktrace

On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 09:12:07AM +0200, Cl??ment B??sch wrote: > > > > "include" means here is a subset. it doesn;t mean here is everything. so > > that is not neccessarily wrong. > > > > Sure, but it sounds incomplete. > because you are expecting a full list. but none is promised. > > > > -

Re: A few manpage fixes for ktrace

On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 02:09:08AM +0200, Cl??ment B??sch wrote: > On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 07:16:06PM +0100, ClC)ment BEsch wrote: > > Hi, hi. i'm late to the party, so sorry if i've missed some stuff... > > > > There is a few trivial things where the ktrace manpage seems wrong, or > > at least

Re: vr(4): documentation incomplete

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 04:49:43PM -0400, Brad wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 09:29:28PM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 02:46:20PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > On 2011/06/23 11:59, Rechner-Tester wrote: > > > > Hi > > > &g

Re: vr(4): documentation incomplete

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 02:46:20PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2011/06/23 11:59, Rechner-Tester wrote: > > Hi > > > > > > The vr(4) man page is missing a note about vlan support. > > Vlan support was added as of OpenBSD 4.3: > > > > Add VLAN reception support to vr(4). > >

Re: user/6494: make -q exits with -1

The following reply was made to PR user/6494; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jason McIntyre To: gn...@openbsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: user/6494: make -q exits with -1 Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 07:52:30 +0100 On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 07:50:34PM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote: > > the man p

Re: user/6494: make -q exits with -1

The following reply was made to PR user/6494; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jason McIntyre To: gn...@openbsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: user/6494: make -q exits with -1 Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 19:50:34 +0100 On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 02:59:00PM +0200, boudew...@indes.com wrote: > >

Re: user/6481: /bin/sh does not honor the errexit option for command lists with && or ||

The following reply was made to PR user/6481; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jason McIntyre To: gn...@openbsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: user/6481: /bin/sh does not honor the errexit option for command lists with && or || Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 20:04:26 +0100 On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 08

Re: minor typo in vi(1) manual page

On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 09:58:53AM -0400, mar...@lavabit.com wrote: > Hello list, > > there is a small typo in the vi(1) manual page concerning the behavior of > Ctrl-U command. The following patch remedies the problem: > fixed, thanks. jmc > Index: vi.1 > ==

Re: Man page for sh does not document "select" command

On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 10:55:29PM +1000, Ross L Richardson wrote: > src/bin/ksh/sh.1 mentions, but fails to document, > the "select" command. Attached patch just > duplicates the relevant chunk from ksh.1 > > Cheers, > rlr > fixed, thanks. jmc

Re: editline(3) does not discuss return values for el_set()

On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:13:46AM -0400, Ross Richardson wrote: > editline(3) fails to mention the possible return > values of el_set(). > > Based on my superficial perusal of the source, it > looks like 0 on success, -1 otherwise. Patch > (based on assumption that this is correct) attached. > -

Re: system/6322: dig ignore -p port option

On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 07:43:39PM +1000, Nathan Rickerby wrote: > > > When you add port to nameserver option in /etc/resolv.conf like > > 'nameserver 192.168.23.21:5300', then dig(1) and host(1) gets timeout. > > Also when port is :53 > > The syntax is > nameserver [192.168.23.21]:5300 > > Th

<    1   2