Andrew Haley wrote:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/4/9 Alan Bateman :
icedtea-jvmtiEnv.patch - I thought JvmtiEnv::GetLineNumberTable already
handled this case so I'm curious why this one is needed.
Added by Andrew Haley as part of work on Shark; perhaps he can explain.
2009/4/9 Alan Bateman :
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>
>> :
>>>
>>> icedtea-bytebuffer-compact.patch - this looks to be a partial fix to
>>> 6593946. If so, 6593946 is already in jdk6/jdk6/jdk
>>> (http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/jdk/rev/3e7bfcdcf96f).
>>>
>>>
>>
>> IcedTea6 is still based on
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
:
icedtea-bytebuffer-compact.patch - this looks to be a partial fix to
6593946. If so, 6593946 is already in jdk6/jdk6/jdk
(http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/jdk/rev/3e7bfcdcf96f).
IcedTea6 is still based on the last build drop of jdk6, not the
Mercurial repo
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> 2009/4/9 Alan Bateman :
>> icedtea-jvmtiEnv.patch - I thought JvmtiEnv::GetLineNumberTable already
>> handled this case so I'm curious why this one is needed.
>
> Added by Andrew Haley as part of work on Shark; perhaps he can explain.
GetLineNumberTable checks for a m
2009/4/9 Andrew John Hughes :
> 2009/4/9 Alan Bateman :
>> Andrew Haley wrote:
>>>
>>> :
>>> The page is at http://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/IcedTea_JDK6_Patches
>>> These are the patches in icedtea/patches and icedtea/patches/hotspot.
>>>
>>>
>>> * Every patch should be assigned to someone.
>>>
>
2009/4/9 Alan Bateman :
> Andrew Haley wrote:
>>
>> :
>> The page is at http://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/IcedTea_JDK6_Patches
>> These are the patches in icedtea/patches and icedtea/patches/hotspot.
>>
>>
>> * Every patch should be assigned to someone.
>>
>> * Every patch should be discussed.
>>
>
2009/4/1 Joseph D. Darcy :
> Andrew Haley wrote:
>>
>> We at Red Hat have noticed that the list of IcedTea local patches has
>> been getting large, with some local patches that should have been
>> pushed upstream. Also, some IcedTea patches have been committed to
>> OpenJDK 7 but not OpenJDK 6.
>>
Andrew Haley schrieb:
> The page is at http://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/IcedTea_JDK6_Patches
> SCA: Enter "OK" here if you are certain that all authors of this patch have an
> SCA on file.
this is not correct. AFAIU all authors of the patch have to submit the patch
under the SCA, just having an
Matthias Klose wrote:
> Andrew Haley schrieb:
>> The page is at http://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/IcedTea_JDK6_Patches
>
>> SCA: Enter "OK" here if you are certain that all authors of this patch have
>> an
>> SCA on file.
>
> this is not correct. AFAIU all authors of the patch have to submit the
2009/4/9 Alan Bateman :
> Andrew Haley wrote:
>>
>> :
>> The page is at http://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/IcedTea_JDK6_Patches
>> These are the patches in icedtea/patches and icedtea/patches/hotspot.
>>
>>
>> * Every patch should be assigned to someone.
>>
>> * Every patch should be discussed.
>>
>
Andrew Haley wrote:
:
The page is at http://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/IcedTea_JDK6_Patches
These are the patches in icedtea/patches and icedtea/patches/hotspot.
* Every patch should be assigned to someone.
* Every patch should be discussed.
* If we can, we will push a patch upstream. If we
Andrew Haley wrote:
> We at Red Hat have noticed that the list of IcedTea local patches has
> been getting large, with some local patches that should have been
> pushed upstream. Also, some IcedTea patches have been committed to
> OpenJDK 7 but not OpenJDK 6.
>
> So, we're going to have a serious
12 matches
Mail list logo
