Erik:
It's time for Oracle to change the official compiler used for building
OpenJDK on Solaris. The new version will be Oracle Developer Studio 12.6
and the build will happen on Solaris 11.3. This patch changes the jib
dependency to use the new devkit and updates the devkit generator script
wit
It's time for Oracle to change the official compiler used for building
OpenJDK on Solaris. The new version will be Oracle Developer Studio 12.6
and the build will happen on Solaris 11.3. This patch changes the jib
dependency to use the new devkit and updates the devkit generator script
with the
This has been observed recently and logged here
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8211016.
The workaround is to manually remove support/src.zip before rebuild.
/Erik
On 2018-09-25 11:50, Jorn Vernee wrote:
Hello,
I'm running into a problem where running `make images` does not update
Hello,
I'm running into a problem where running `make images` does not update
the `images/jdk/lib/src.zip` file. I have tried deleting the file and
then running the command, which creates the src.zip, but it still has
the old source files in it.
I'm debugging using my IDE (Netbeans), but wit
The plan is that we do, given the recently adopted policy.
/Erik
On 2018-09-25 10:31, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
Now that JDK 11 is available, what are the plans to bump up the boot
JDK version?
-- Jon
Forwarded Message
Subject: Java 11 / JDK 11: General Availability
Dat
Now that JDK 11 is available, what are the plans to bump up the boot JDK
version?
-- Jon
Forwarded Message
Subject:Java 11 / JDK 11: General Availability
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 10:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: [email protected]
Reply-To: [email protected]
On Tue, 2018-09-25 at 08:52 -0700, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> Yes, it is indeed. I recognize that now.
>
> /Erik
>
>
> On 2018-09-25 08:49, Alan Bateman wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 25/09/2018 16:43, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> > > At Oracle, I'm pretty sure we need to maintain the current behavior
> > > so
Yes, it is indeed. I recognize that now.
/Erik
On 2018-09-25 08:49, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 25/09/2018 16:43, Erik Joelsson wrote:
At Oracle, I'm pretty sure we need to maintain the current behavior
so that patch needs to be accompanied by a corresponding patch in
Oracle closed.
Is this th
On 25/09/2018 16:43, Erik Joelsson wrote:
At Oracle, I'm pretty sure we need to maintain the current behavior so
that patch needs to be accompanied by a corresponding patch in Oracle
closed.
Is this the same issue as JDK-8044235 that Omair fixed in JDK 9:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk
At Oracle, I'm pretty sure we need to maintain the current behavior so
that patch needs to be accompanied by a corresponding patch in Oracle
closed.
/Erik
On 2018-09-25 05:15, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
Hi,
We have a local spec file patch so that we include all sources in
src.zip shipped with t
Thanks for the heads-up, we've seen this one too but noticed that you had
already a bug opened .
Best regards, Matthias
> -Original Message-
> From: Roman Kennke
> Sent: Dienstag, 25. September 2018 17:05
> To: Baesken, Matthias ; 'build-
> [email protected]' ; net-dev d...@open
Related, I've also filed:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8211071
and waiting for review here:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2018-September/055666.html
Thanks,
Roman
> Hello, one additonal info , my colleague looking into the compile issues
> after 8211029 f
Hello, one additonal info , my colleague looking into the compile issues
after 8211029 found this error ,
when compiling on linuxx86_64 :
=== Output from failing command(s) repeated here ===
* For target support_native_java.base_libnet_DatagramPacket.o:
In file included from
/OpenJDK/82103
Hello, it looks like
8211029: Have a common set of enabled warnings for all native libraries
breaks a lot of our Linux based builds.
Our gcc 4.8 misses some of the introduced command line options :
cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-misleading-indentation"
[-Werror]
cc1p
Hi,
We have a local spec file patch so that we include all sources in
src.zip shipped with the JDK. Would this be acceptable for upstream? If
not, are there any particular reasons? If yes, I prepare a patch for
this (if desired in a backwards compat way).
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webr
> 25 sep. 2018 kl. 10:21 skrev Roman Kennke :
>
> Not sure this is the correct list. Please redirect as appropriate.
I believe core-libs is the appropriate place. Cc:d.
>
> Please review the following proposed change:
>
>
> There are 3 asserts in unpack.cpp which check only constants, and
Not sure this is the correct list. Please redirect as appropriate.
Please review the following proposed change:
There are 3 asserts in unpack.cpp which check only constants, and which
the compiler rejects as 'has no effect' (in fastdebug builds). This
seems to be caused by:
https://bugs.openjdk
17 matches
Mail list logo
