* All of the awt-related directories (libawt_* and common) include an
unnecessary extra layer, the "sun" directory. It is not needed anymore,
Let's *not* do that. It also affects the destination package.
Remember sun.* is the protected top-level package .. and
people won't always be running in j
-x86_64-normal-server-release/jdk/modules/jdk.jconsole/_the.jdk.jconsole_batch]
Error 3
make[2]: *** [jdk.jconsole-java] Error 2
make[1]: *** [main-wrapper] Error 2
make: *** [default] Error 2
-phil.
On 08/20/2014 02:37 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On 8/20/2014 1:26 PM, Phil Race wrote:
I understoo
I understood we now build individual modules so when
I touched one java source file in the desktop module I expected to see only
that one module rebuilt but I see this :-
Compiling 2787 files for java.desktop
Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated API.
Note: Recompile with -Xlint:dep
On a related note I am scratching my head about why some files
destined to be compiled into libawt or libawt_xawt go into a directory
called 'common'.
Eg OpenGL sources are in common but aren't common to all libs
or even to all awt libs, since they would go into libawt on windows
and libawt_xawt o
Looks Ok to me.
-phil.
On 7/17/2014 12:43 PM, David DeHaven wrote:
Ping? Can a build-dev Reviewer approve this?
-DrD-
Please review my trivial backport of JDK-8038027. The actual change is
identical to 9, the difference is the surrounding $(JAVA) is $(JAVA_SMALL) in
JDK 9.
JBS Issue:
http
Looks good to me. This has been a constant pain so I am very happy to
see it fixed
-phil.
On 6/2/2014 4:58 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
A friendly reminder that this still needs to be reviewed.
/Erik
On 2014-05-23 12:31, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
This patch attempts to fix a build problem in
BTW .. I just realised I haven't seen a bug ID in this thread.
Does one already exist ?
-phil.
On 5/21/14 5:49 PM, Omair Majid wrote:
* Andrew Hughes [2014-05-21 20:23]:
- Original Message -
* Andrew Hughes [2014-05-21 12:22]:
I'm not keen on the hardcoding of '-ljpeg'
+ LIBJPEG_
On 05/21/2014 08:06 AM, Omair Majid wrote:
I will need to push that closed generated-configure.sh afterwards however
so that closed builds don't break.
Anything I need to do to ensure the pushes are co-ordinated correctly?
Just make sure I notice the push and I'll fix ASAP ..
-phil.
enerated-configure.sh afterwards however
so that closed builds don't break.
-phil.
On 05/20/2014 10:18 AM, Phil Race wrote:
I'm going to apply the patch and run it through open + closed builds
cross-platforms ..
-phil..
On 5/20/2014 10:15 AM, Anthony Petrov wrote:
Thanks for the update, Om
I'm going to apply the patch and run it through open + closed builds
cross-platforms ..
-phil..
On 5/20/2014 10:15 AM, Anthony Petrov wrote:
Thanks for the update, Omair. The fix looks good to me now.
--
best regards,
Anthony
On 5/20/2014 9:11 PM, Omair Majid wrote:
Hi,
Updated webrevs:
ht
As for how much head is actually needed, I haven't dug into it, but
just doing a simple javac -XmxXXXM Foo.java, I could only get up to
about 1500M. I wasn't able to build on my laptop, but my lab machine
worked just fine, so it's probably close to the border.
Brad
On 3/12
I've run the patch through jprt and it builds fine (in default mode) on
closed builds
on all OS versions we build on .. so looks good.
-phil.
On 4/28/2014 8:27 AM, Omair Majid wrote:
Hi Phil,
* Phil Race [2014-03-19 12:41]:
On 3/17/2014 4:27 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
I don't
Vote: yes
-phil.
On 3/17/2014 4:27 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
While we generally support moving files to a proper location, if this
move is causing trouble for Phil and the 2d team, we think it can be
an acceptable exception this time to just single out the LCMS.c file.
(This can be achieved by setting INC
tmore had similar issues last week. The
problem in his case was that the 32 bit VM couldn't get a large enough heap.
Switching to a 64 bit boot jdk resolved the issue for him.
Mike
On Mar 12 2014, at 14:45 , Phil Race wrote:
I'm on Windows 7 64 bit and I've quit every app e
I'm on Windows 7 64 bit and I've quit every app except for my console
windows
yet I still get this error below.
How can I get past this ?
-phil.
--
## Starting jdk
Compiling 9635 files for BUILD_JDK
The system is out of resources.
Consult the following stack trace for details.
java.
I filed https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036948
-phil.
On 3/7/2014 12:41 PM, Phil Race wrote:
After the change below all my Solaris builds are failing.
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk9-dev-changes/2014-March/000524.html
Its failing at least on the JPRT sfbay server
After the change below all my Solaris builds are failing.
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk9-dev-changes/2014-March/000524.html
Its failing at least on the JPRT sfbay server ..
Eg :-
...build/solaris-x86_64-normal-server-release/jdk/classes/com/sun/rowset/RowSetResourceBundle_zh_HK.prope
The moving of most of these files will cause me some significant pain.
I am not convinced why its necessary. And if done wrong we lose the
history. Even if done *right* the history is harder to get at.
Plus the jigsaw people are very likely to move this code *again*.
I need to look at this more, b
ages/cursors/motif_MoveDrop32x32.gif
lib/images/cursors/motif_MoveNoDrop32x32.gif
lib/psfont.properties.ja
lib/psfontj2d.properties
lib/sound.properties
Mandy
[1]
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/file/tip/src/share/classes/sun/print/PSPrinterJob.java
On 2/27/14 12:32 PM, Phil Race wrote:
Magnus,
I
has turned into a blocker to handle all those
misplaced files when we need to reshuffle all source code.
So, to summarize:
* The code using those files will not be affected.
* This is needed for the jigsaw project.
With that information, I hope you can reconsider your position.
/Magnus
26
/2014 10:46 AM, Phil Race wrote:
Adding 2d-dev as 2d owns this file and might like to know where it went.
My 2p : the files are however interpreted solely by the code with
which it is co-located.
So unless the build will come crashing down around us, I'd very much
prefer that these
files st
Adding 2d-dev as 2d owns this file and might like to know where it went.
My 2p : the files are however interpreted solely by the code with which
it is co-located.
So unless the build will come crashing down around us, I'd very much
prefer that these
files stay exactly where I put them ...
-ph
The README-builds.html file specifies SS12 Update 1 + a bunch of patches
There's probably a good reason for all of that and new architectures often
need compiler fixes, so does the same occur if you upgrade and patch ?
-phil.
On 2/12/2014 7:48 AM, Baesken, Matthias wrote:
I noticed when buildi
This is OK for your own build but no more than that. Users won't have
X11 installed
and even if they did I am not sure it'll work.
So you need to be able to build with a freetype that can be relocated
and bundled
as part of your distribution. The one from the OS X X11 doesn't work
for that.
A
Vote: yes
-phil.
On 12/3/2013 2:53 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
I hereby nominate Magnus Ihse Bursie to Membership in the OpenJDK
Build Group.
On 12/2/2013 1:28 PM, Sean Mullan wrote:
'j' sounds reasonable to me. However, I'm not really sure if the 'j2'
here is from 'j2se', 'j2re', or 'j2sdk', I would have to ask some
developers who did the original implementation. It could have been
simply to help avoid naming clashes with other
I had this problem recently and I don't think you need restore the files
- just the directory.
I used hg mv to relocate the files but because *all* files were moved out
of the directory so hg deleted the directory. It was sufficient to
mkdir again for webrev to properly recognise the files as
Seems fine to me given that the versions are identical across all SDKs
we might use.
Also since this simply removes a required build component, there should
be no
'flag day' where people need to be given notice to install a new build
component.
I think you said that you didn't have the standalon
en
it made sense
because I had done some updates and I had trouble running cygwin (the
shell I think).
Here I've not done anything like that and I cured it by quitting a few apps.
I think I need to wait for the next time it occurs to try this to see if
it really will help.
-phil.
/Erik
On 20
My Win 7 x 64 showed it had approx 2GB (out of 6GB) memory free when I
got this message
doing an incremental build :-
## Starting langtools
/cygdrive/c/jdks/jdk8_2d/common/bin/logger.sh: fork: retry: Resource
temporarily unavailable
/cygdrive/c/jdks/jdk8_2d/common/bin/logger.sh: fork: retry: Re
On 7/29/2013 10:25 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
Thanks Phil, I found
build\windows-x86-normal-server-fastdebug\corba\gensrc and in that dir
is one file _the_idls.d with one line
IDLS_ARE_CREATED=yes
Pete
Hmm .. in my case that is there but there are also com & org directories
with
in all about 3Mb
Its generated from the IDL file by the idl compiler.
Should be under build/macosx.../corba/gensrc/
-phil.
On 7/29/2013 8:01 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
I don't see BindingListHolder.java in the repo at
hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/awt/corba/file/a013024b0747/src/share/classes/org/omg/CosNaming
Is it su
Flogging a dead horse here ..
> it shouldn't really be necessary to do partial builds any more (it
was way too fragile in the past with the old build)
I whole heartedly disagree. I've said it before and I say it again.
I do not want to build hotspot or anything else besides JDK
I do not want t
Looks fine to me too ... I wish I'd seen this 30 seconds ago.
I literally just hit this bug on mac and filed a dup (which I'll close)
and then saw this RFR.
BTW What I'm trying to do is see the gcc compiler options that
are actually used on Mac. debug and info options didn't
reveal anything. What
I created a stripped down platform-specific set of sources for the
Windows build
and although it doesn't look like it was fatal I see the following :-
## Starting jdk
/usr/bin/find: `/cygdrive/c/jdks/jdk8_2d/jdk/src/solaris/classes': No
such file or directory
/usr/bin/find: `/cygdrive/c/jdks/jdk
3 1:40 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 05/06/2013 19:02, Phil Race wrote:
Yes, please support the old build system.
Is this really necessary? The old build is a tax and we really need it
to die. In this case, it's a new feature and I don't see any point in
anyone spending time adding this
Omair,
Since this entirely affects a 2D component, please include 2d-dev in
this discussion.
I would have been 'surprised' to see this change if I hadn't just
spotted this thread.
And I believe this change should be integrated via the 2D forest.
Yes, please support the old build system.
I am no
That helps a *lot* ! Only 84 files being compiled for my case.
-phil.
On 5/20/2013 2:44 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hi, Phil.
You can try to use filter option:
For example:
make JDK_FILTER=sun/java2d/loops
On 21.05.2013 0:04, Phil Race wrote:
I am getting very frustrated trying to do some
Jon,
That should make it faster but does it fix what seems like
non-existent dependency analysis in the build ?
-phil.
On 5/20/2013 1:07 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
On 05/20/2013 01:04 PM, Phil Race wrote:
I am getting very frustrated trying to do some simple work
on my Mac using JDK 8. I
I am getting very frustrated trying to do some simple work
on my Mac using JDK 8. I touch *one* .java source file and
I have to wait > 4 minutes for the build system which goes
off and compiles everything. I have an SSD and i7 chip
so I don't want to imagine what it would be like on a slower
syste
CUPS is used by the Java 2D printing APIs on Solaris & Linux and similar.
If you want to build an implementation of "Java SE" on a platform where
printing
is supported and you do not enable printing, then you will fail the JCK.
The suggestion that servers don't print is odd. They sometimes do,
> (Yes, this is one of those rare cases in which a sponsor should use
the -u option.)
I'd hazard a guess that there are number of people who overlook this option
in part because they don't realise you can do
hg commit -u ...
I was kind of surprised myself when I first learned to do this as
dency files. The visual studio compiler doesn't have
this feature. There are ways this can be worked around. I've created
8011687 to track this issue.
/Erik
On 2013-04-02 10:16, Erik Joelsson wrote:
On 2013-03-29 00:00, Phil Race wrote:
If you touch a header fie, the build is supposed to n
2013 02:29 PM, Phil Race wrote:
1. Why do we have both --with-cups and --with-cups-include ?
All we use is the header files so the latter is what matters and
I'm not sure which one the build system prefers if both are set.
2. In the old build I could do
cd make/sun/font
make clean
1. Why do we have both --with-cups and --with-cups-include ?
All we use is the header files so the latter is what matters and
I'm not sure which one the build system prefers if both are set.
2. In the old build I could do
cd make/sun/font
make clean
make all
Is there anything analagous
Do you have the SUNWfreetype2 package installed ?
-phil.
On 3/12/2013 3:29 AM, mikhail cherkasov wrote:
Hello all,
Could you please advise where I can get freetype2 for Solaris?
I'm looking for binaries for amd64/i386, I've tried to build it, but
faced with the following error:
gmake: ***
If I understand correctly, this removes the directory containing
the JDK's copy of giflib sources from the set of locations to be
compiled etc, and replaces it with just a link line pointer to use
"libgif" which is then expected to be on the default linker path,
ie in /usr/lib.
I think this is fi
> Using the jfxrt.jar from 7u15 works OK, but not the one built from
the cloned repo.
I don't know what Pete cloned .. but JavaFX is a mixture of native and
Java, just like
JDK and you can't mix and match the jar and the native any more than you
could
mix rt.jar from 7u13 and native libs from
2d-dev *and* sound-dev I should say ..
-phil.
On 2/12/2013 5:09 PM, Phil Race wrote:
I am not sure if you mean will it be "fixing" this.
The JDK 8 new build system should not be making any changes to the choice
of library or tools being used here or anywhere else without
discussi
ive on how stable-complete the JDK 8 build is or will be,
especially for Windows?
Randy
-Original Message-----
From: Phil Race [mailto:philip.r...@oracle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 4:45 PM
To: Randy Nielsen
Cc: Kelly O'Hair; build-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: build JDK 7 Wind
unately I can't redistribute this file, but it is available through MSDN.
Regards,
Randy
-Original Message-
From: Phil Race [mailto:philip.r...@oracle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 11:42 AM
To: Randy Nielsen
Cc: Kelly O'Hair; build-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: build
I think Microsoft may have recently removed this.
Typing "summer 2004 direct x sdk" into google, the top hit is
a link to the download location but it is no longer is a valid link.
Obviously lots of people already have a copy but I'm not sure
if they can redistribute it to you.
We specified that
Yes you need VS2003. At this point your best bet to get it may be ebay :-)
-phil.
On 2/7/2013 12:18 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
Hi I have VS 2010 and need to build JDK6. Using my typical JDK7 set up
with VS 2010 make sanity reports
../make/common/shared/Compiler-msvc.gmk:129 *** COMPILER_PATH cann
I am not sure why you need a chrooted install.
You can run 32 bit JDK on 64 bit Linux. Its just that the distros make
it a bit of a pain as
you need to go and get the 32 bit X11 and other libs.
-phil.
On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 20:13:46 +0200, Phil Race
wrote:
I am fairly sure we do not want the bu
I am fairly sure we do not want the build system to spit out a 64 bit
client VM by default.
My recollection from many years ago is that the VM team and performance
team determined
that the 64 bit server VM was as good as, or better than the 64 bit
client VM on all the
metrics that mattered and t
e java code available ?
Le 17 oct. 2012 à 18:27, Phil Race a écrit :
PS .. I could be misremembering or misunderstanding but the other
obstacle I ran into when I looked at this (ages ago) was that the freetype
I built was expecting to be installed in a specific location. I didn't
think it
eemed that the freetype.dylib was fussy about where it was placed.
Could you also check that your build works and really loads *your*
version of the lib - try using a Postscript Type 1 font via
Font.createFont(),
that should trigger it.
-phil.
On 10/17/12 9:18 AM, Phil Race wrote:
On 10/17/12 1:
the Java2D team owns this part of the code. (I cc'd Phil Race).
Ticket created : #2361569
Link to patches provided inside
What number is that ? I think its just an incident. I will file a JIRA bug
on this shortly .. but I had tried the patch yesterday and FWIW it doesn't
seem to remo
A huge step backwards.
I don't want to have to clone or keep hotspot up to date
and I prefer using the 'RE' builds of hotspot to any I would create.
I have never found this fragile. Its worked well for over 10 years ...
-phil.
On 9/10/2012 8:36 AM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
Having to compile hotsp
I don't know why we build xawt on OS X - at least by default.
We don't use X11 for UI in our JDK on Mac and I'm 99% sure its not
getting tested.
Building the XAWT toolkit on OS X perhaps should be an optional selection
-phil.
On 7/27/2012 10:48 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Some interesting inform
Fine by me.
-phil.
On 7/4/2012 5:32 AM, Anthony Petrov wrote:
Looks good to me. Although most of the changes are in Java2D code, so
I'm also CC'ing 2d-dev@ to take a look.
--
best regards,
Anthony
On 7/3/2012 10:23 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
The build infra project added the use of the annotat
I have one concern
It sounds like the option is new in gcc 4.4 :
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/porting_to.html
I am not sure you can assume that since ..
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/raw-file/tip/README-builds.html#gcc
" The GNU gcc compiler version should be 4.3 or newer."
And I sugges
On 5/23/2012 9:32 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
- Original Message -
I suppose the problem that some new version of GCC enables this
option
by default and
we could run into a problem at run time if we don't disable it ?
Yes, 4.4 to be precise. It's not particularly new; it came out on
Apr
at 17:01, Phil Race wrote:
I suppose the problem that some new version of GCC enables this option by
default and
we could run into a problem at run time if we don't disable it ?
But this patch would appear to disable it for the whole ICU library .. and any
other C++ code in the .so
whi
I suppose the problem that some new version of GCC enables this option
by default and
we could run into a problem at run time if we don't disable it ?
But this patch would appear to disable it for the whole ICU library ..
and any other C++ code in the .so
which I would have to suppose impacts t
Looks fine. If its not a pain, 2d forest would probably be the most
appropriate as 3/4 are 2D ..
-phil.
On 4/25/2012 8:27 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
[ cc'ing awt-dev & 2d-dev ]
The change looks fine Magnus, though it may be best to push through
the awt or 2d forest. Members of these groups, cc
It looks OK to me but I'm not an ant expert.
-phil.
On 3/2/2012 12:57 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
7150324: Stop using drop bundles in jaxp
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk8/infra-jaxp/webrev/
I'm working on helping to get the jdk8 build-infra changes integrated, this is
for jaxp.
This i
On windows headless is simply a state.
But Solaris/Linux have "true" headless builds where there are headless
(stub) versions of UI libraries.
And I think that headless is a valid JCK mode .. you can pass JCK in
headless
on platforms that don't support UI. But I'd check the JCK guys on that one
we can make it into a
module.
Why does it need to be a module before that can happen ?
So far as I can tell initially binary goes into rt.jar either way
(source in shared or separate repo).
-phil.
On 2/3/2012 12:11 PM, Phil Race wrote:
Oh, its for lambda! Thank you for mentioning that. I
Oh, its for lambda! Thank you for mentioning that. I had no clue what we
needed this thing for :-), may be it was obvious to the rest of the world
but not to me and I was surprised it wasn't mentioned in Jim's email.
But does it really need its own new repo ? I think there needs to be a
discuss
Volker,
Will you be able to debug this ?
FWIW my cygwin is 1.7.8 and I use win7 x64, for JDK builds and have done
so for about as
long as its been available, and probably the main issue I've had is
accidentally using the
wrong version of gnu make, and I don't know offhand any more if the
cygw
On 11/30/2011 5:15 AM, Ulf Zibis wrote:
Am 30.11.2011 13:10, schrieb Dmitry Samersoff:
On 2011-11-30 16:05, Steve Poole wrote:
I suggested maintaining the name as src/solaris partly because I don't
believe in churn
and am not sure what would make a better name other than src/unix ..
would that
other than src/unix ..
would that be OK ?
You could create src/sunos for the really sunos parts ..
Keeping the name the same also makes applying backport patches much easier.
Well, that and of course my fingers know it very well.
-phil.
On 11/29/2011 2:00 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 29/11/2011 1
--src
|--share
|--posix
|--winapi
|--SYSV
|--GNU
|--BSD
|--solaris
|--aix
|--gnu
|--linux
|--darwin
|--freebsd
|--windows
|--wince
* 95%+ of the code will be the same across solaris/linux/etc
An
Its tricky.
I would not gratuitously change any of the directory names, especially
the win32 one.
There'd have to be a compelling reason.
The Linux and Solaris ports share X11 for their windowing system, but
the OS X port
doesn't. So some mac things would go in src/solaris, as they are
shar
Sean,
I am not sure what you mean by "installed" - installed into
\windows\system32
or installed in the JRE bin directory? But the latter is the only way
its supposed to
work, and the build should take the copy of freetype.dll you provide to
it, and
copy it to that location. At runtime, freet
Fredrik,
Ulf started this by asking about openjdk 6 which does need VS2003.
It doesn't support VS2010 .. and JDK 7 and 8 already build with VS2010
Express
and have done so for well over a year. No need to use that forest, just
standard 7.
-phil.
On 10/26/2011 9:34 AM, Fredrik Öhrström wrote:
On 10/17/2011 2:13 PM, Phil Race wrote:
Looks fine to me .. I assume that building these moved to be in tandem
with their existence.
A better word than "assume" is"interpret" ..
-phil.
-phil.
On 10/17/2011 1:54 PM, chris.grus...@oracle.com wrote:
I am still lo
Looks fine to me .. I assume that building these moved to be in tandem
with their existence.
-phil.
On 10/17/2011 1:54 PM, chris.grus...@oracle.com wrote:
I am still looking for a reviewer.
Please,
-ChrisG
On 10/13/2011 5:03 PM, chris.grus...@oracle.com wrote:
openjdk make changes to skip de
I concur. Out of the box, 32 bit builds with even the closest extant
free SDK may be something that has never even been tried and my
guess is it won't work without changes.
-phil.
On 10/16/11 7:09 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Windows 2000 and Visual Studio 2003 is for 32bit.
Windows 2003 and Micros
Vote: yes
Well .. we do not distribute binaries of 6-open so that's a bit of a
stumbling block.
Plus 6-open is relatively new in the great scheme of things and is more
of a 6/7 hybrid.
-phil.
On 6/3/2011 9:02 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
On 08:57 Fri 03 Jun , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
The documented
your decision, if you wish, on subsequent lines.
This is optional and not required.
Only Members of the Build Group are eligible to vote on this decision [2].
The current Members are:
Kelly O'Hair
Mark Reinhold
Xiomara Jayasena
Tim Bell
Phil Race
David Katleman
For jpeg its something we could consider for JDK 8 although I think its been
called libjpeg since JDK 1.0 without apparent problems.
But this JDK libxinerama is only for Solaris (SPARC, specifically), and
on Solaris
Xinerama functionality has always lived in libXext.so, so there's no clash.
Sola
I suspect you are interested in the fix for
7020815: REBASE should not be required for windows jdk repo builds - can't
build with VS 2010 Express
It was pushed a few days ago ...
-phil.
On 3/15/2011 11:09 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
Visual C++ 2010 Express has no rebase.exe in the SDK/bin director
Looks good.
-phil.
On 3/15/2011 4:25 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Need reviewer: Disable use of VS2003
Prior to completely removing the VS2003 through VS2008 makefile logic in the
jdk7 makefiles,
Phil recommended that I just disable it to start out. Seems like a grand idea.
;^)
This does not app
Looks good.
-phil.
On 3/15/2011 2:25 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Need reviewer for these 2 demo fixes:
6685150: make/mkdemo/jpda/Makefile creates jpda.jar and src.zip instead of
examples.jar
6710813: SwingSet2 source display tabs do not work since JDK 7 b20
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openj
Andrew,
Whilst almost everything you wrote is something I agree with (like getting
jcheck out there, not adding additional build tools/complexity), the one
thing I quite like right now comes up here I'd like to keep is the
separate repos.
Its not just hotspot, but I've been working on JDK for
Approved.
-phil.
On 1/10/11 4:28 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Need reviewer: jdk/make/common/shared/Defs-windows.gmk
Minor correction that impacts anyone that installs VS2010 in a
non-space location or sets
VS100COMNTOOLS to a directory with no spaces.
7011382: Fix use of VS100COMNTOOLS when in
Looks ok to me.
-phil.
On 12/28/2010 3:19 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Need Reviewer: Windows VS2010 warning silencing
With Windows VS2010 compilers, we started seeing many warnings about
supposedly insecure function usage.
These are not actually detecting errors as much as indicating that
certai
On 12/14/2010 10:50 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
You said Windows 7, but the makefile seemed to have gotten 6.1 from
the systeminfo, is that right?
Is 6.1 Windows 7? If so that sure is confusing. :^(
Yes, Windows 7 is "6.1". Windows 7 is a marketing name.
-phil.
Not addressing the how to delete part, but hopefully this is a VERY old
directory.
I was getting these files back in the spring and fixed it in May
in jdk/make/common/shared/Platform.gmk as thus :-
--- a/make/common/shared/Platform.gmk
+++ b/make/common/shared/Platform.gmk
@@ -275,7 +275,12 @@ i
Raffaello Giulietti wrote:
On 2010-08-06 18:29, Phil Race wrote:
Well .. that is the very newest freetype but the doc is correct in that
its referring to 2.3
More precisely, it's referring to "2.3 or newer".
which was all that existed when it was written. Its
Well .. that is the very newest freetype but the doc is correct in that
its referring to 2.3
However if you are on Linux then jdk will use the system freetype and some
distros are disabling the hinting for technical reasons.
I think the reason is that a lot of free fonts are not hinted so turni
You may be better off posting to the awt-dev list as this doesn't sound
like a build issue, and AWT developers spend more time being cosy with
the VS debugger.
-phil.
On 6/16/2010 12:39 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
My prior post is what I did when VS was activated due to a crash. Now
that I'm not cr
_MSDEVTOOLS_PATH for
these
VS2010 based builds, whereas with VS2003 it may not have been necessary.
Basically you need to set this to point at the SDK's bin directory.
-phil.
On 6/13/2010 12:41 AM, Phil Race wrote:
At this time we've not tried openjdk builds with VS2010
I know freetype
At this time we've not tried openjdk builds with VS2010
I know freetype check has issues but not hard ones. It appears that's
the only issue, but fixing it is TBD.
Your various path issues are likely not unique to VS2010
The failure to find "rc" and "mt" is probably most easily rectified by
set
Changeset: daf617c34be6
Author:prr
Date: 2010-05-19 10:21 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/hotspot/rev/daf617c34be6
6953588: hotspot\src\share\vm\interpreter\bytecodes.cpp doesn't compile with
VS2010 on AMD64
Reviewed-by: dcubed
! src/share/vm/interpreter/bytecodes
Changeset: 416cfd5c6ca9
Author:prr
Date: 2010-05-19 09:45 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/jdk/rev/416cfd5c6ca9
6903970: VS2008/VS2010 build fails in make/sun/jkernel because of "afxres.h"
missing
Reviewed-by: ohair, art
! make/common/shared/Defs-windows.gmk
! make
301 - 400 of 429 matches
Mail list logo
