On 2015-01-14 08:22, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Roman,
On 14/01/2015 7:41 AM, Roman Kennke wrote:
Ok I think I found a way to avoid copying the whole #define block just
for one line. I define that line before (and empty in case of SHARK) and
use that inside the big #define.
http://cr.openjdk.java
Hi Roman,
On 14/01/2015 7:41 AM, Roman Kennke wrote:
Ok I think I found a way to avoid copying the whole #define block just
for one line. I define that line before (and empty in case of SHARK) and
use that inside the big #define.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rkennke/shark-build-hotspot/webrev.02
Ok I think I found a way to avoid copying the whole #define block just
for one line. I define that line before (and empty in case of SHARK) and
use that inside the big #define.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rkennke/shark-build-hotspot/webrev.02/
Please review and push if ok.
Roman
Am Freitag, den
Hi David,
> > - In ciTypeFlow.cpp only include some files and code only when building
> > C2. I don't think that code makes sense outside of C2. (That's the issue
> > that you've seen).
>
> Looks okay but someone from compiler team needs to comment. There may be
> other code that need adjusting
Hi Roman,
Commenting on the hotspot changes ...
On 8/01/2015 9:01 PM, Roman Kennke wrote:
Hi Erik,
I'm CC-ing hotspot-dev for review of Hotspot code related changes.
Yes, some additional changes to Hotspot are required. This is the full
set of changes needed to build and run Shark:
http://cr
On 2015-01-08 12:54, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 01/08/2015 11:38 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
I tried building locally (Ubuntu 14.04 with llvm 3.4) but it failed with
undefined references at link time:
/usr/lib/llvm-3.4/lib/libLLVMSupport.a(Process.o): In function
`llvm::sys::Process::FileDescriptorHas
On 01/08/2015 11:38 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> Hello Roman,
>
> Thanks for the full patch!
>
> I discovered a problem with the top repo patch. When autoconf (using m4)
> evaluates your change, the brackets disappear. To fix this, more
> brackets need to be added. Here is a version that works fo
Hello Roman,
Thanks for the full patch!
I discovered a problem with the top repo patch. When autoconf (using m4)
evaluates your change, the brackets disappear. To fix this, more
brackets need to be added. Here is a version that works for me that will
make the correct sed expression appear in
On 01/08/2015 11:31 AM, Roman Kennke wrote:
> I guess for my purposes it's good enough to pass some GCC flag to turn
> on C++11 support, so that the new LLVM headers can be used. That's all
> that I need.
But does that work without further changes?
Andrew.
Am Donnerstag, den 08.01.2015 um 21:20 +1000 schrieb David Holmes:
> On 8/01/2015 9:05 PM, Roman Kennke wrote:
> > Oh and notice that if you try to build it yourself, use a version of
> > LLVM < 3.5. In 3.5, C++11 is used/required, and OpenJDK doesn't support
> > C++11 yet. (are there any plans abo
On 8/01/2015 9:05 PM, Roman Kennke wrote:
Oh and notice that if you try to build it yourself, use a version of
LLVM < 3.5. In 3.5, C++11 is used/required, and OpenJDK doesn't support
C++11 yet. (are there any plans about this?) I'd recommend LLVM 3.4.2.
C++11? We still have workarounds for comp
Oh and notice that if you try to build it yourself, use a version of
LLVM < 3.5. In 3.5, C++11 is used/required, and OpenJDK doesn't support
C++11 yet. (are there any plans about this?) I'd recommend LLVM 3.4.2.
Roman
Am Donnerstag, den 08.01.2015 um 11:03 +0100 schrieb Erik Joelsson:
> Hello Rom
Hi Erik,
I'm CC-ing hotspot-dev for review of Hotspot code related changes.
Yes, some additional changes to Hotspot are required. This is the full
set of changes needed to build and run Shark:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rkennke/shark-build-hotspot/webrev.01/
In detail:
- In the Makefile fix a
Hello Roman,
This addition looks good to me.
Thinking about what the others said, it might be inconvenient to have
all this be pushed to different forests. I tried applying all the
changes to jdk9/hs-rt, but I can't seem to build zeroshark.. Did you
have more hotspot changes to be able to fin
On 8/01/2015 1:10 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
On 2015-01-07 15:45, Roman Kennke wrote:
Hello there,
I made some fixes to the build machinery to be able to build Shark:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rkennke/shark-build-top/
Looks fine, but the generated configure script needs to be generate
Hi Erik,
When I built Zero and Shark on my Raspberry Pi, I noticed another
problem when copying jvm.cfg into the right places. I fixed it in a
similar way as I did for the SA stuff:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rkennke/shark-build-jdk/webrev.02/
I think that should be all for now.
Please push th
Am Mittwoch, den 07.01.2015 um 17:49 +0100 schrieb Erik Joelsson:
> On 2015-01-07 17:29, Roman Kennke wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 07.01.2015 um 17:16 +0100 schrieb Erik Joelsson:
> >> On 2015-01-07 17:11, Roman Kennke wrote:
> >>> Hi Erik,
> >>>
> >>> Do you have a bug for this?
> >>> No.
> >>>
> >
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Roman Kennke wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 07.01.2015 um 17:16 +0100 schrieb Erik Joelsson:
>> On 2015-01-07 17:11, Roman Kennke wrote:
>> > Hi Erik,
>> >
>> > Do you have a bug for this?
>> > No.
>> >
>> > I haven't pushed any changes to JDK in a while. Is it possible
On 2015-01-07 17:29, Roman Kennke wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 07.01.2015 um 17:16 +0100 schrieb Erik Joelsson:
On 2015-01-07 17:11, Roman Kennke wrote:
Hi Erik,
Do you have a bug for this?
No.
I haven't pushed any changes to JDK in a while. Is it possible in the
meantime for me to create my own
Am Mittwoch, den 07.01.2015 um 17:16 +0100 schrieb Erik Joelsson:
> On 2015-01-07 17:11, Roman Kennke wrote:
> > Hi Erik,
> >
> > Do you have a bug for this?
> > No.
> >
> > I haven't pushed any changes to JDK in a while. Is it possible in the
> > meantime for me to create my own bugs? Otherwise, p
On 2015-01-07 17:11, Roman Kennke wrote:
Hi Erik,
Do you have a bug for this?
No.
I haven't pushed any changes to JDK in a while. Is it possible in the
meantime for me to create my own bugs? Otherwise, please file one for
me :-)
You should be able to log in to https://bugs.openjdk.java.net and
Hi Erik,
> >>> I made some fixes to the build machinery to be able to build Shark:
> >>>
> >>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rkennke/shark-build-top/
> >> Looks fine, but the generated configure script needs to be generated by
> >> the script as it also updates a timestamp inside the file. We will s
On 2015-01-07 16:41, Roman Kennke wrote:
Hi Erik,
I made some fixes to the build machinery to be able to build Shark:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rkennke/shark-build-top/
Looks fine, but the generated configure script needs to be generated by
the script as it also updates a timestamp inside
Hi Erik,
> > I made some fixes to the build machinery to be able to build Shark:
> >
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rkennke/shark-build-top/
> Looks fine, but the generated configure script needs to be generated by
> the script as it also updates a timestamp inside the file. We will still
> nee
Hello,
On 2015-01-07 15:45, Roman Kennke wrote:
Hello there,
I made some fixes to the build machinery to be able to build Shark:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rkennke/shark-build-top/
Looks fine, but the generated configure script needs to be generated by
the script as it also updates a timesta
I just realized that I posted some unneeded stuff, and that the check
for ZERO *or* ZEROSHARK can be made simpler:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rkennke/shark-build-jdk/webrev.01/
Roman
Am Mittwoch, den 07.01.2015 um 15:45 +0100 schrieb Roman Kennke:
> Hello there,
>
> I made some fixes to the bu
Hello there,
I made some fixes to the build machinery to be able to build Shark:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rkennke/shark-build-top/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rkennke/shark-build-hotspot/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rkennke/shark-build-jdk/
In particular, it does:
- Improve the sed command to
27 matches
Mail list logo
