On 06/21/2018 09:03 AM, pilot constatinus wrote:
> Hi, i recently tried to compile openjdk 9. Fedora x86_64 28 gcc 8.1.1. I
> think gcc is causing this problem. I did a default bash get_source.sh and
> bash ./configure. Now make is the problem.
>
> https://pastebin.com/VhmStrYP
Configure with --d
Hi Constaninus
See
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2018-June/022427.html
for a work-around and the follow up issue raised to solve it correctly.
-Patrick
On 2018-06-21 10:03, pilot constatinus wrote:
Hi, i recently tried to compile openjdk 9. Fedora x86_64 28 gcc 8.1.1.
I
Hi, i recently tried to compile openjdk 9. Fedora x86_64 28 gcc 8.1.1. I
think gcc is causing this problem. I did a default bash get_source.sh and
bash ./configure. Now make is the problem.
https://pastebin.com/VhmStrYP
I’ve used modules recently, right?)
Ted Neward
Author, Speaker, Mentor
http://www.newardassociates.com
t: @tedneward | m: (425) 647-4526
From: Jonathan Gibbons
Date: Thursday, February 15, 2018 at 7:27 AM
To: Ted Neward ,
Subject: Re: JDK10 build problem: "--module-path"?
Cc: Alan Bateman , Ted Neward ,
Jonathan Gibbons , "build-dev@openjdk.java.net"
Subject: Re: JDK10 build problem: "--module-path"?
Looking at
https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=all§ion=all&arch=any&keywords=openjdk-9-jdk&searchon=names
it seems like Ub
Looking at
https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=all§ion=all&arch=any&keywords=openjdk-9-jdk&searchon=names
it seems like Ubuntu ships whatever openjdk-9 is available at time of
creation of a specific version, and doesn't update it afterwards, not even
for the quarterly security patches.
On Thu
I have hit this same problem once for the same reason Alan describes.
Ubuntu provided me with a really old EA build of 9.
/Erik
On 2018-02-15 00:05, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 15/02/2018 06:32, Ted Neward wrote:
Really?!? I thought the javac -help only listed -modulepath. Not to
disbelieve you
Ted,
Yes, I'm sure :-) This is the relevant line from the source code for JDK
9, listing --module-path and -p as alternatives for this option.
MODULE_PATH("--module-path -p", "opt.arg.path", "opt.modulepath",
STANDARD, FILEMANAGER),
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/langtools/file/65bfd
On 15/02/2018 06:32, Ted Neward wrote:
Really?!? I thought the javac -help only listed -modulepath. Not to disbelieve
you *grin*, but are you sure? The reason I ask is (barring some really bizarre
misconfiguration) I should be using the OpenJDK9 as the boot JDK for this, and
I'm getting the
Really?!? I thought the javac -help only listed -modulepath. Not to disbelieve
you *grin*, but are you sure? The reason I ask is (barring some really bizarre
misconfiguration) I should be using the OpenJDK9 as the boot JDK for this, and
I'm getting the error.
Ted Neward
Author, Speaker, Mentor
On 2/14/18 4:38 PM, Ted Neward wrote:
I’m getting a weird error in my OpenJDK 10 (tip) build, where after pulling
source and configure, I get a build error about the Java compiler being
executed with “--module-path” as a parameter, which obviously isn’t a
legitimate javac flag.
I can't s
On 15/02/2018 10:38 AM, Ted Neward wrote:
I’m getting a weird error in my OpenJDK 10 (tip) build, where after pulling
source and configure, I get a build error about the Java compiler being
executed with “--module-path” as a parameter, which obviously isn’t a
legitimate javac flag.
Is this ju
I’m getting a weird error in my OpenJDK 10 (tip) build, where after pulling
source and configure, I get a build error about the Java compiler being
executed with “--module-path” as a parameter, which obviously isn’t a
legitimate javac flag.
Is this just me? Is anybody else able to repro this
Hello Prasanta,
Yes, it's https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8164297. I'm about to
push the fix to jdk9/hs. The problem goes away if you use the Oracle
internal official devkit.
/Erik
On 2016-08-19 15:21, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
Hi All,
I have tried to checkout fresh jdk9-client r
Hi All,
I have tried to checkout fresh jdk9-client repo today in ubuntu 32 bit
linux and build but experiencing a failure
*/export/WorkSpaces/jdk9/client-jigsaw/build/linux-x86-normal-server-fastdebug/support/test/hotspot/jtreg/native/support/exeinvoke/exeinvoke.o:
In function `main':**
**/expo
Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 2:35 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-01 21:17, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Could you help me to resolve 9 build problem on Solaris 11.2:
/usr/ccs/bin/nm: solaris_x86_64.o: No such file or directory
gmake[8]: *** [libjvm.so] Error 1
gmake[8]: Leaving direct
sky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 11:47 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 08:20, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 2:35 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-01 21:17, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Could you help me to resolve 9 build problem on Solaris 11.2:
/usr/ccs/bin/nm: solaris_x86_6
detsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 1:06 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 11:25, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 11:47 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 08:20, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 2:35 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-01 21:17, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
C
tsky wrote:
Hello,
Could you help me to resolve 9 build problem on Solaris 11.2:
/usr/ccs/bin/nm: solaris_x86_64.o: No such file or directory
gmake[8]: *** [libjvm.so] Error 1
gmake[8]: Leaving directory
`/jdk9/client/build/solaris-x86_64-normal-server-fastdebug/hotspot/solaris_amd64_co
tsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 11:47 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 08:20, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 2:35 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-01 21:17, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Could you help me to resolve 9 build problem on Solaris 11.2:
/usr/ccs/bin/nm: solaris_x86_64.
, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 08:20, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 2:35 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-01 21:17, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Could you help me to resolve 9 build problem on Solaris 11.2:
/usr/ccs/bin/nm: solaris_x86_64.o: No such file or directory
:20, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 2:35 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-01 21:17, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Could you help me to resolve 9 build problem on Solaris 11.2:
/usr/ccs/bin/nm: solaris_x86_64.o: No such file or directory
gmake[8]: *** [libjvm.so] Error 1
gmake[8
:20, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 2:35 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-01 21:17, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Could you help me to resolve 9 build problem on Solaris 11.2:
/usr/ccs/bin/nm: solaris_x86_64.o: No such file or directory
gmake[8]: *** [libjvm.so] Error 1
gmake[8
, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-01 21:17, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Could you help me to resolve 9 build problem on Solaris 11.2:
/usr/ccs/bin/nm: solaris_x86_64.o: No such file or directory
gmake[8]: *** [libjvm.so] Error 1
gmake[8]: Leaving directory
`/jdk9/client/build/solaris
:20, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 2:35 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-01 21:17, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Could you help me to resolve 9 build problem on Solaris 11.2:
/usr/ccs/bin/nm: solaris_x86_64.o: No such file or directory
gmake[8]: *** [libjvm.so] Error 1
gmake[8
you help me to resolve 9 build problem on Solaris 11.2:
/usr/ccs/bin/nm: solaris_x86_64.o: No such file or directory
gmake[8]: *** [libjvm.so] Error 1
gmake[8]: Leaving directory
`/jdk9/client/build/solaris-x86_64-normal-server-fastdebug/hotspot/solaris_amd64_compiler2/fastdebug'
gm
21:17, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Could you help me to resolve 9 build problem on Solaris 11.2:
/usr/ccs/bin/nm: solaris_x86_64.o: No such file or directory
gmake[8]: *** [libjvm.so] Error 1
gmake[8]: Leaving directory
`/jdk9/client/build/solaris-x86_64-normal-server-fastdebug/hotspot
On 2015-06-01 21:17, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Could you help me to resolve 9 build problem on Solaris 11.2:
/usr/ccs/bin/nm: solaris_x86_64.o: No such file or directory
gmake[8]: *** [libjvm.so] Error 1
gmake[8]: Leaving directory
`/jdk9/client/build/solaris-x86_64-normal-serv
6-02 08:20, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 2:35 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-01 21:17, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Could you help me to resolve 9 build problem on Solaris 11.2:
/usr/ccs/bin/nm: solaris_x86_64.o: No such file or directory
gmake[8]: *** [libjvm.so] Error 1
gmake[8
On 2/06/2015 5:54 PM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 9:27 AM, David Holmes wrote:
On 2/06/2015 4:20 PM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 2:35 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-01 21:17, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Could you help me to resolve 9 build problem on Solaris 11.2
you help me to resolve 9 build problem on Solaris 11.2:
/usr/ccs/bin/nm: solaris_x86_64.o: No such file or directory
gmake[8]: *** [libjvm.so] Error 1
gmake[8]: Leaving directory
`/jdk9/client/build/solaris-x86_64-normal-server-fastdebug/hotspot/solaris_amd64_compiler2/fastdebug'
gm
On 2015-06-02 11:25, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 11:47 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 08:20, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 2:35 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-01 21:17, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Could you help me to resolve 9 build problem on Solaris
On 6/2/2015 11:47 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 08:20, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 2:35 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-01 21:17, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Could you help me to resolve 9 build problem on Solaris 11.2:
/usr/ccs/bin/nm: solaris_x86_64.o: No
On 2015-06-02 08:20, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 2:35 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-01 21:17, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Could you help me to resolve 9 build problem on Solaris 11.2:
/usr/ccs/bin/nm: solaris_x86_64.o: No such file or directory
gmake[8]: *** [libjvm.so
On 6/2/2015 9:27 AM, David Holmes wrote:
On 2/06/2015 4:20 PM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 2:35 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-01 21:17, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Could you help me to resolve 9 build problem on Solaris 11.2:
/usr/ccs/bin/nm: solaris_x86_64.o: No such
On 2/06/2015 4:20 PM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 6/2/2015 2:35 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-01 21:17, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Could you help me to resolve 9 build problem on Solaris 11.2:
/usr/ccs/bin/nm: solaris_x86_64.o: No such file or directory
gmake[8]: *** [libjvm.so
On 6/2/2015 2:35 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-01 21:17, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Could you help me to resolve 9 build problem on Solaris 11.2:
/usr/ccs/bin/nm: solaris_x86_64.o: No such file or directory
gmake[8]: *** [libjvm.so] Error 1
gmake[8]: Leaving directory
`/jdk9
On 2015-06-01 21:17, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Could you help me to resolve 9 build problem on Solaris 11.2:
/usr/ccs/bin/nm: solaris_x86_64.o: No such file or directory
gmake[8]: *** [libjvm.so] Error 1
gmake[8]: Leaving directory
`/jdk9/client/build/solaris-x86_64-normal-server
Hello,
Could you help me to resolve 9 build problem on Solaris 11.2:
/usr/ccs/bin/nm: solaris_x86_64.o: No such file or directory
gmake[8]: *** [libjvm.so] Error 1
gmake[8]: Leaving directory
`/jdk9/client/build/solaris-x86_64-normal-server-fastdebug/hotspot/solaris_amd64_compiler2/fastdebug
Hi,
I am trying to build jdk9 client workspace
[http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client] on windows7 but encountered
problem while doing "configure". I have installed Visual C++ 2010
express. Does anyone knows what might be the problem?
$ bash ./configure --with-target-bits=32
Running custom
On 2015-02-25 11:25, prasanta sadhukhan wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to build jdk9 client workspace (
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client).
I installed Visual C++ 2010 express and I could see VS100COMNTOOLS
env. var has been setup. But when I try to configure, i am getting
following problem. Doe
Hi,
I am trying to build jdk9 client workspace (
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client).
I installed Visual C++ 2010 express and I could see VS100COMNTOOLS env.
var has been setup. But when I try to configure, i am getting following
problem. Does anyone know what might cause this?
$ bash ./
Hi Erik
On 08/26/14 07:30, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 26/08/2014 14:02, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Thanks for pointing this out. That is indeed a better and more
portable solution. I took the liberty of creating a new bug and
creating a patch reverting my earlier change and using this instead.
Bug: ht
On 26/08/2014 14:02, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Thanks for pointing this out. That is indeed a better and more
portable solution. I took the liberty of creating a new bug and
creating a patch reverting my earlier change and using this instead.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8056064
We
Thanks for pointing this out. That is indeed a better and more portable
solution. I took the liberty of creating a new bug and creating a patch
reverting my earlier change and using this instead.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8056064
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/805
On 13/03/2012 9:03 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Just seems like a very poorly written Makefile to me.
Where is the actual webrev or patch, I could not see it.
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/attachments/20070511/62a3961e/attachment.bin
Mangled by the mail servers. Here's my own pa
Just seems like a very poorly written Makefile to me.
Where is the actual webrev or patch, I could not see it.
-kto
On Mar 11, 2012, at 9:48 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> This is a blast from the past:
>
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2007-May/26.html
>
> but the above iss
This is a blast from the past:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2007-May/26.html
but the above issue and patch seem to have been ignored. I just ran into
this myself.
/export/users/dh198349/jdk8/builds/b01/se8-linux-i586-ea/tmp/sun/com.sun.java.util.jar.pack/unpack-cmd/obj
Jason,
You can build 64-bit VM on 64-bit machine, but only the server VM. The
client VM is not supported in 64-bit.
Not sure why your build is trying to build the client VM here.
David
On 6/03/2012 8:26 AM, Jason Van Cleve wrote:
Hi,
I hope it's okay to ask questions here, as I've been hav
rc-b24-14_nov_2011]$
> -Original Message-
> From: Kelly O'Hair [mailto:kelly.oh...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 10:47 AM
> To: Jason Van Cleve
> Cc: build-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: Build Problem
>
> You really aren't providin
You really aren't providing enough information to go on here.
As of now, building 32bit requires a 32bit OS, and building 64bit requires a
64bit OS.
The amd64 is a 64bit library, the i386 is a 32bit library, these libraries will
not mix at runtime.
So there are lots of facts you are leaving ou
Hi,
I hope it's okay to ask questions here, as I've been having trouble
building "openjdk-6-src-b24-14_nov_2011". I am getting the "cannot find
-ljvm" error, which library it seems to want to find at
"jre/lib/amd64/client/libjvm.so" in my bootstrap JDK. But I have three
JDKs installed, and none
Changeset: 31ce3cac3cc1
Author:ohair
Date: 2009-09-18 16:26 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/corba/rev/31ce3cac3cc1
6883790: corba build problem related to wildcard and vpath, regression
Reviewed-by: tbell
! make/common/Rules.gmk
Andrew Haley wrote:
lianshun Liu wrote:
Hi,
I build OpenJDK on Windows platform, and choose /openjdk as the build dictory.
I've a problem that I need to rebuild the whole project everytime when I hack
the VM. It is really a long time that I can't use the computer to do anything
else. So, is
If all you are working on is hotspot, then you can build just
hotspot by doing a 'cd hotspot/make && make'.
From that same Makefile in hotspot/make you can also try using:
make JDK_IMAGE_DIR="../../build/*/j2sdk-image" update_jdk
To update a jdk image with your newly build hotspot libraries.
Andrew Haley wrote:
> lianshun Liu wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I build OpenJDK on Windows platform, and choose /openjdk as the build
>> dictory.
>> I've a problem that I need to rebuild the whole project everytime when I
>> hack the VM. It is really a long time that I can't use the computer to do
>> any
lianshun Liu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I build OpenJDK on Windows platform, and choose /openjdk as the build dictory.
> I've a problem that I need to rebuild the whole project everytime when I hack
> the VM. It is really a long time that I can't use the computer to do anything
> else. So, is there any wa
Hi,
I build OpenJDK on Windows platform, and choose /openjdk as the build dictory.
I've a problem that I need to rebuild the whole project everytime when I hack
the VM. It is really a long time that I can't use the computer to do anything
else. So, is there any ways to solve this? Thanks:)
Best
2009/3/31 Jonathan Gibbons :
> Andrew,
> See this response sent by Tim on March 26.
> -- Jon
>
> Hi Neale:
>
> I’m trying to build the JDK for the first time. I grabbed the sources from
> the mercurial repository and followed the FAQ to perform the build. It
> builds a heap of stuff before it dies
Andrew,
See this response sent by Tim on March 26.
-- Jon
Hi Neale:
I’m trying to build the JDK for the first time. I grabbed the
sources from the mercurial repository and followed the FAQ to
perform the build. It builds a heap of stuff before it dies with
the following:
error: com.sun.
This is with jdk-7-ea-plug-b52-linux-x64-26_mar_2009.jar:
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64/bin/java -Xmx896m -Xms128m
-XX:PermSize=32m -XX:MaxPermSize=160m
"-Xbootclasspath/p:/local/openjdk7/jdk7/build/linux-amd64/langtools/dist/bootstrap/lib/javac.jar"
-jar
/local/openjdk7/jdk7
I found the cause (thanks to Igor Nekrestyanov). It was in my build
script. I explicitly set the MAKE environment variable. Accidentally,
the variable included the "all" target. It caused make always do the
"all" target. It crashed the build.
Thanks,
--Mikhail
Mikhail Lapshin wrote:
Hello,
Hello,
I try to build the latest jdk7 on Windows XP and get the following error:
n:/archer/export5/re/jdk/7/latest/binaries/W7GB8U~D/bin/javac
-J-XX:ThreadStackSize=768 -J-client -J-Xmx384m -J-Xms128m
-J-XX:PermSize=32m -J-XX:MaxPermSize=160m -g -source 1.5 -target 5
-encoding ascii
-Xbootcl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: 'build-dev'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Build problem (Windows, b24)
>
> I dunno if I changed it since the blog post (I'll have to update it
> once I
> get this all working again), but right now it reads:
>
> export ALT_JDK_IMP
ecember 30, 2007 4:06 PM
> To: Ted Neward
> Cc: 'build-dev'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Build problem (Windows, b24)
>
>
> This could be a problem:
>
>export ALT_JDK_IMPORT_PATH=$(cygpath --unix C:/Prg/jdk1.6.0)
>
> Should just be:
>
>
forward slashed
DOS-like paths). Yes?
Ted Neward
Java, .NET, XML Services
Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
http://www.tedneward.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 10:35 AM
To: Ted Neward
Cc: 'build-de
lashed
DOS-like paths). Yes?
Ted Neward
Java, .NET, XML Services
Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
http://www.tedneward.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 10:35 AM
> To: Ted Neward
> Cc:
vices
Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
http://www.tedneward.com
-Original Message-
From: Ted Neward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 3:56 PM
To: 'Ted Neward'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'build-dev'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Build problem (W
007 3:56 PM
> To: 'Ted Neward'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: 'build-dev'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Build problem (Windows, b24)
>
> Something strange is going on. When I build from the top-level
> directory, it
> fails to build java/hpi. When I build just on
PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: 'build-dev'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Build problem (Windows, b24)
>
> OK, trying to get back into this.
>
> (*) FWICT, ALT_OUTPUTDIR doesn't seem to "take" when set from the
> command
> shell as an environm
gestions welcome
Ted Neward
Java, .NET, XML Services
Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
http://www.tedneward.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 11:58 AM
> To: Ted Neward
> Cc: [EMAIL PRO
ng? It's just a common thing to have the build tool
logging this stuff these days, it seems.
Ted Neward
Java, .NET, XML Services
Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
http://www.tedneward.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 1
ng, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
http://www.tedneward.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 12:12 AM
To: Ted Neward
Cc: 'build-dev'
Subject: Re: Build problem (Windows, b24)
Hi -
OpenJDK:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/
eward
Java, .NET, XML Services
Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
http://www.tedneward.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 12:12 AM
> To: Ted Neward
> Cc: 'build-dev'
> Subject
Hi -
OpenJDK:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make/java
$ make all
Maybe you came in too low and clipped the treetops.
Try your 'make all' from [...]/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK/jdk7/jdk/make
The first thing the jdk7/jdk build does (after the sanity check) is create a number of
lting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
http://www.tedneward.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:build-dev-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted Neward
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 11:42 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: 'build-dev'
> Sub
Monday, December 17, 2007 2:17 PM
> To: Ted Neward
> Cc: 'build-dev'
> Subject: Re: Build problem (Windows, b24)
>
> linker_md.c is part of the jdk build not hotspot, in the jdk/make 'hpi'
> area.
>
> -kto
>
>
> Ted Neward wrote:
> > Ah,
, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
http://www.tedneward.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 8:58 AM
To: Ted Neward
Cc: 'build-dev'
Subject: Re: Build problem (Windows, b24)
When I said log file, I meant your log file, I assum
MAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 8:58 AM
> To: Ted Neward
> Cc: 'build-dev'
> Subject: Re: Build problem (Windows, b24)
>
> When I said log file, I meant your log file, I assumed that you had
> done something like
> make |& tee build.log
ED] [mailto:build-dev-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted Neward
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 6:25 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: 'build-dev'
> Subject: RE: Build problem (Windows, b24)
>
> Good question--where is said log file, again? :-)
>
> Te
ng, Writing
http://www.tedneward.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2007 12:38 PM
To: Ted Neward
Cc: 'build-dev'
Subject: Re: Build problem (Windows, b24)
Some guesses... Try setting COMPANY_NAME to somet
: Ted Neward
> Cc: 'build-dev'
> Subject: Re: Build problem (Windows, b24)
>
> Some guesses... Try setting COMPANY_NAME to something other than
> empty,
> although that makes little sense because anyone building with
> OPENJDK=true
> would have an empty company
Some guesses... Try setting COMPANY_NAME to something other than empty,
although that makes little sense because anyone building with OPENJDK=true
would have an empty company name (jdk/make/common/shared/Defs.gmk).
Humm... but that warning about STR is just a warning...
That fatal error is about
Build fails with the following:
>>>Recursively making windows all @ Sat Dec 15 08:27:29 PST 2007 ...
make[6]: Entering directory
`/cygdrive/c/Prg/OpenJDK.HG/jdk7/jdk/make/java/hpi/w
indows'
/usr/bin/mkdir -p c:/Prg/OpenJDK.HG/jdk7/build/WINDOW~2/lib
/usr/bin/mkdir -p c:/Prg/OpenJDK.HG/jdk7/
84 matches
Mail list logo
