I'll make sure that these comments gets to the guide writing team:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received.
Thanks,
iris
Hi.
The CORBA code isn't maintained directly in OpenJDK, but rather in a
sub-project of GlassFish (https://glassfish-corba.dev.java.net/).
That's why there's no CORBA Group. (The same goes for JAXWS and JAXP.)
For a list of projects and their associated mailing lists (including
contact
Hi, Volker.
I think that the right thing for this change [1] is for you to push into
ppc-aix-port/stage once you get the necessary reviews (presumably Erik and
possibly Alan). While your changeset contains some general purpose updates, it
also contains PPC/AIX-specific files which can't be
Hi, Kelly.
You've been Build Group Lead since 2007! Thanks for all of your hard work and
dedication!
For those wishing to nominate a new Group Lead, please see these instructions
for Group Lead nomination, approval, and ratification on the Group overview
page [1].
Thanks,
iris
[1]:
Yes, you're still a member... just not the Lead.
iris
-Original Message-
From: Kelly O'Hair [mailto:kellyoh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 8:56 AM
To: Magnus Ihse Bursie
Cc: build-dev
Subject: Re: CFV: Nomination of Tim Bell as the new Build Group Lead
Do I get to vote?
Hi, Erik.
I think the change looks fine.
Thanks,
iris
-Original Message-
From: Erik Joelsson
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 6:28 AM
To: build-dev
Subject: RFR: JDK-8042348: Copyright link in Javadoc page for Java SE 8
Hello,
Please review this small patch to javadoc generation. The
Hi, Mike.
The minimum recommended version of Hg on the client side is 2.6.3 [1, 2]. I'd
recommend a warning for anything older than that.
Thanks,
iris
[1]: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/announce/2014-March/000164.html
[2]: http://openjdk.java.net/guide/repositories.html#installConfig
Hi, Martijn.
Likewise - is it possible to get edit access?
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Build/Supported+build+platforms
That wikispace is owned by the Build Group, so all Members of that Group as
listed in the Census [0] should be able to edit the page.
Thanks,
iris
[0]
Hi, Staffan.
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8075056
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sla/8075056/webrev.00/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sla/8075056/webrev.00/
Looks good. I'm always happy to see changes where complexity is reduced.
Thanks,
iris
Hi, Magnus.
Thanks for taking care of this.
The modified regular expression looks like it will handle Verona builds now.
Regards,
iris
-Original Message-
From: Magnus Ihse Bursie
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 5:43 AM
To: build-dev@openjdk.java.net
Cc: jdk9-versioning_ww_grp
Hi, Daniil.
You change looks good to me.
Thanks for tracking down this issue.
Regards,
iris (not a Reviewer)
-Original Message-
From: Daniil Titov
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2015 2:12 PM
To: build-dev@openjdk.java.net
Cc: verona-...@openjdk.java.net
Subject: RFR: 8135083 Product
Hi, Claes.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/816/webrev.4/
Overall, this change looks good. I just have a few concerns.
Have you built this forcing alternative build numbers? I
-Original Message-
From: Claes Redestad
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2016 12:56 PM
To: core-libs-dev
Hi, Claes.
[ Sorry for the premature send, my keyboard started interpreting my shortcuts
in unexpected ways. ]
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/816/webrev.5/
Nice bugid.
Overall, this change looks good. I just have a few concerns.
Have you built this forcing alternative build
PM
To: Mandy Chung
Cc: Iris Clark; core-libs-dev; build-dev
Subject: Re: RFR: 816: Runtime.version() cause startup regressions in 9+119
Sorry, uploaded the previous diff again by mistake, updated in-place now.
On 2016-06-28 00:04, Mandy Chung wrote:
>
>> On Jun 27, 2016, at 2:
Hi, Volker.
Thanks for your patience.
I think that the solution that you've provided solves the immediate problem,
the java.specification.version number is incorrectly set to be identical to
java.version. The java.{vm.}?specification.version system properties should be
independent of
Hi, Volker.
>> I've also filed build bug (8162687) referencing 8145919 and 8162686.
> I suppose you wanted to refer to "java.vm.specification.version" in
"8162687: ava.specification.version is always set to $MAJOR at build time"
because "java.vm.specification.version" is actually being set in
Hi, Erik.
Your change looks good.
Thanks,
iris
-Original Message-
From: Erik Joelsson
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 5:57 AM
To: build-dev
Subject: RFR: JDK-8029942: Update VERSION_MAJOR for JDK 10
The default major version for the jdk 10 repos needs to be updated from
9 to 10.
Hi.
Another build target we need to update is LICENSE_URL in make/Docs.gmk. Here's
the equivalent bug for 10:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8189919
I've requested this link:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/terms/license/java11speclicense.html
Thanks,
iris
f12
Yes!
iris
-Original Message-
From: Paul Sandoz
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 10:41 AM
To: Iris Clark <iris.cl...@oracle.com>
Cc: Erik Joelsson <erik.joels...@oracle.com>; Joseph D. Darcy
<joe.da...@oracle.com>; compiler-...@openjdk.java.net; build-dev
<build-dev@openjd
Please review this small change to update the link to the
Specification license referenced by the JavaDoc API. For
JDK 10, we should reference the 10 redirect.
Bug:
8189919: Update link to license in Docs.gmk
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8189919
webrev:
Thanks for the review, Mark.
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iris/8189919/webrev/
Pushed.
iris
Looks good to me.
iris
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Gibbons
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2018 11:58 AM
To: build-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: RFR: JDK 11 P1: 8209806: API docs should be updated to refer to
javase11
Please review a simple high priority fix for JDK 11 that updates
Hi.
I believe that the internal page Christian references is for the test system.
If you want to know whether the push arrived in the repository, you could
subscribe to jdk-submit-chan...@openjdk.java.net. The archive of recent push
notifications is public:
Thanks, Tim!
Pushed.
iris
-Original Message-
From: Tim Bell
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2018 9:11 PM
To: Iris Clark <iris.cl...@oracle.com>
Cc: build-dev <build-dev@openjdk.java.net>
Subject: Re: RFR(XS): 8200469: Update link to license in Docs.gmk
Iris:
> Bug:
>
>
Please review this small change to update the link to the
Specification license referenced by the JavaDoc API. To
avoid the need for future updates based on the version
number, we should use $(VERSION_NUMBER) instead of a
specific version number.
Bug:
8200469: Update link to license in
Hi.
Please review changes to use "https" instead of "http" for links in the
generated JavaDoc API pages:
8212994: Links to Oracle websites should use "https:"
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8212994
webrev: https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iris/8212994/webrev/
I did
Hi, Lance and Erik.
Thanks for the super-speedy reviews. Pushed.
iris
From: Lance Andersen
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 1:48 PM
To: Iris Clark
Cc: build-dev@openjdk.java.net; Jonathan Gibbons
Subject: Re: RFR(XS): 8212994: Links to Oracle websites should use "https:&qu
Hi, Jon.
> JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8226628
Looks good. Thanks for taking care of this.
Iris
Hi, Erik.
I'm happy to see this change go in. It looks good.
Just one comment. When removing the footer in jvmit.html, I suspect that you
also need to make changes to jvmti.xsl, which was also modified when the
copyright footer was inserted in this changeset:
Hi, Erik.
> New webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8223319/webrev.02/
The revised webrev looks good.
Thank you!
Iris
Hi, Mikael.
Thanks for the review!
iris
-Original Message-
From: Mikael Vidstedt
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2020 10:35 PM
To: Iris Clark
Cc: build-dev@openjdk.java.net; Jesper Wilhelmsson
Subject: Re: [16] RFR (XS) 8246803: Update link to license in Docs.gmk
Looks good.
Cheers,
Mikael
Hi, Joe.
> Updating the link for JDK 16 looks fine; thanks,
Thanks for the amazingly fast review!
Iris
Hi.
Please review this small change to update the link to the Specification license
referenced
by the JavaDoc API for JDK 16:
bug:
8246803: Update link to spec license in Docs.gmk
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8246803
webrev:
Hi, Mark.
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8250216
>
> [ ... ]
>
> Patch below.
Looks good.
I think it would be nice if you could reference the JDK Project page
(ojn/projects/jdk), not just ojn.
Thanks,
Iris
Hi, Mark.
>> I think it would be nice if you could reference the JDK Project page
>> (ojn/projects/jdk), not just ojn.
>
> Good idea ... but I just pushed the changeset. I’ll fix that later.
Sorry for the late review. You change wasn't there when I visited the README
source and I haven't
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 22:51:29 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> This patch changes how the docs-reference make target behaves to better
> support the requirements for it. This target is used to generate javadocs in
> a more stable way between releases, so that they those docs are better suited
> for
On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 22:01:51 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> In JDK-8251551, the top level README file changed names to README.md. In
> jib-profiles.js we have a reference to this file to identify if the current
> source tree is likely to be complete. This reference needs to be updated.
Marked as
On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 06:22:51 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Start of JDK 17 updates.
Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1531
On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 02:19:51 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Updating to the symbol files for JDK 16 b30; change generated with the script
>
> make/scripts/generate-symbol-data.sh
>
> The change to the java.desktop module looks to be for JDK-8258373.
Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 19:54:12 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> The build on Windows can fail if certain directory names are present in root
> directory of the workspace. In particular I've observed that the single
> letter 'p' is triggering this problem. This is caused by missing quotes
> around
On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 19:38:58 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> 8267630: Start of release updates for JDK 18
>
> Joe Darcy has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in
> by the merge/rebase. The pull
On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 22:44:03 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Update symbol files in JDK 18 for changes in JDK 17 b26.
Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4477
On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 14:42:24 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> 8267630: Start of release updates for JDK 18
>
> Joe Darcy has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
> or a rebase. The pull request now contains 25 commits:
>
> - Merge branch 'master' into 8267630
> - Update
On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:13:48 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> Please review the change to update to using jtreg 6.
>
> The primary change is to the jib-profiles.js file, which specifies the
> version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In
> addition, the `requiredVersion`
On Mon, 24 May 2021 22:35:04 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> 8267630: Start of release updates for JDK 18
Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4175
On Sun, 6 Jun 2021 22:03:46 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> The @jls and @jvms taglet share most of their functionality. A JLS URL
> looks like
>
> https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se16/html/**jls**-8.html#jls-8.1
>
> and a JVMS URL looks like
>
>
>
On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 16:54:57 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> JDK 17 b28 had two fixes which updated the symbol information. A
> CallerSensitive annotation was removed as part of JDK-8268349 and API changes
> in JDK-826.
>
> These should be reflected in the JDK 18 symbol information for 17.
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 19:15:52 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> Apple rebranded the operating system as "macOS" back in 2016. The JDK bundles
> files are still use the legacy "osx" string. They should be modernized to use
> "macos" instead.
Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).
-
On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 03:51:18 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
>> Apple rebranded the operating system as "macOS" back in 2016. The JDK
>> bundles files are still use the legacy "osx" string. They should be
>> modernized to use "macos" instead.
>
> Mikael Vidstedt has updated the pull request
On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 15:44:47 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
> I'm not exactly sure what I intended to say in this partial comment. Removing
> it.
Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3766
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 01:13:12 GMT, Bradford Wetmore wrote:
> Disable the "missing" target for java.smartcardio from doclint.
Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2930
On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 02:21:00 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> Please review a small change to Docs.gmk, such that the short version string
> in the upper right corner of the main API docs bundle is linked to a page
> that links to other versions of the documentation. While it is not so useful
>
On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 14:40:48 GMT, Conor Cleary wrote:
>> This fix addresses the following warnings which were generated by building
>> JDK API documentation with the `-Xdoclint:all` option enabled:
>>
>>
On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 22:36:28 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> Please review a moderately simple change to `make/Docs.gmk` to move the link
> for "Other Versions" from a "hidden" link in the top nav bar to an explicit
> link in the "bottom" text. The link is placed to appear after the sentence
>
On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 07:20:21 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> With JDK 16 having gone GA about a month ago it's time to bump the minimum
> boot JDK version for mainline/JDK 17.
>
> Testing: tier1-5.
Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).
-
PR:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 18:15:58 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> The bootjdk used for macosx-aarch64 at Oracle is a custom build of JDK 16
> from early December, so does not include all the JDK 16 GA functionality.
> This leads to build issues after JDK-8263621 which uses a method not included
> in
On Wed, 18 Aug 2021 22:06:13 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> Please review a small (delete one character) change to improve the error
> messages reported when bad HTML is detected when post-processing the output
> from pandoc to generate the docs.
>
> The change is just to pass the filename as
On Wed, 25 Aug 2021 13:57:29 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> Link to license terms from the JavaDoc API footer is broken in point releases
> (for example, 16.0.2).
>
> Instead of using VERSION_NUMBER, VERSION_FEATURE should be used,
Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).
-
PR:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 06:47:07 GMT, Saravana Kumar Vijayasekaran
wrote:
> 8271150: Remove EA from JDK 17 version string starting with Initial RC
> promotion on Aug 5, 2021(B34)
Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17/pull/297
On Fri, 6 Aug 2021 16:39:34 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> Please review the fix to the subject issue. The root cause of this problem is
> that the currency for the country code `XK` is undefined because the country
> code is user-defined in the ISO 3166 standard. However, it is commonly used
> to
On Fri, 24 Sep 2021 23:07:33 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
> GenGraphs tool generates the module graph. It currently supports the
> configuration via javadoc-graphs.properties. However,
> `make/jdk/src/classes/build/tools/jigsaw/javadoc-graphs.properties` only
> documents two properties. It should
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 20:03:55 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> With the JDK 17 GA out it's time to bump the minimum boot JDK version for
> mainline/JDK 18.
>
> Testing: tier1-5, GHA builds
Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5639
On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 01:24:49 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> This PR is to upgrade the time zone data in the JDK to IANA's tzdata2021c
> level. Note that the tz data is "as is", as released by IANA. No `merged
> links` are retracted.
> The PR also fixes two issues along with the 2021c upgrade.
Marked
On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 18:57:28 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> This is to incorporate the ISO 4217 amendment #170, which has been released
> today, effective immediately.
Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5790
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 18:38:35 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> The time to get JDK 19 underway draws nigh, please review this usual set of
>> start-of-release updates, including CSRs for the javac and javax.lang.model
>> updates:
>>
>> JDK-8277512: Add SourceVersion.RELEASE_19
>>
On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 18:26:24 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Usual update to the JDK 19 symbol files for changes in JDK 18; this time
> JDK-8276660 in JDK 18 build 28.
Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6948
On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 14:16:37 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> This patch adds the version field to .jcheck/conf. By doing this we can
> remove the corresponding configuration from the Skara bots, which in turn
> reduces the need for timing and general complexity of starting a new JDK
> release.
On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 04:30:38 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> The time to get JDK 19 underway draws nigh, please review this usual set of
>> start-of-release updates, including CSRs for the javac and javax.lang.model
>> updates:
>>
>> JDK-8277512: Add SourceVersion.RELEASE_19
>>
On Thu, 28 Oct 2021 01:02:27 GMT, Yoshiki Sato wrote:
> Please review the integration of tzdata2021e (including tzdata2021d) to the
> JDK.
> The fix has passed all relevant JTREG regression tests and JCK tests.
>
> 8275754: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2021d
> 8275849: TestZoneInfo310.java
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 03:28:46 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> An exploratory build indicates that it is not necessary to disable the
> accessibility doclint check for the java.naming module.
-
Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6688
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 05:51:37 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> Trivial update to change the version to 19-ea, and update the single
> reference to the "current release".
>
> Content changes for 19 will follow.
>
> Thanks,
> David
Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).
-
PR:
On Sun, 5 Dec 2021 23:45:32 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Exploratory builds indicate it is not currently necessary to exclude the
> doclint accessibility checks; this patch enables them.
>
> (Enabling the reference checks is left for future work.)
Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 22:42:38 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> Please review the changes for upgrading the Unicode support in the JDK, from
> version 13 to version 14. Corresponding CSR has also been drafted.
Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).
-
PR:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 14:39:31 GMT, Matteo Baccan wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have reviewed the code for removing double semicolons at the end of lines
>
> all the best
> matteo
Nice tidy of the code.
Is there anything that can be done to prevent re-introduction of this trivial
problem? Perhaps a new
On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 18:10:17 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> This is to incorporate the ISO 4217 amendment 171 for Sierra Leonean LEONE
> redenomination (removing 3 zeros). Its effective date is 4/1, but I went
> ahead as JDK19 won't be released by 4/1.
Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 18:46:13 GMT, Pavel Kharskii wrote:
> …C promotion B35 on February 10, 2022
>
> Remove EA from JDK 18 version string starting with Initial RC promotion B35
> on February 10, 2022
Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).
-
PR:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 17:05:45 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
> Change so that jib users pick up and use the latest JMH devkit.
>
> Testing: verified locally
Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7090
On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 19:03:36 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Update of JDK 18 symbol information for build 32.
>
> @lahodaj , can you take a look at the diff? Given the code changes for
> JDK-8270416: "Enhance construction of Identity maps"
>
On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 03:19:06 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> With the JDK 18 GA out it's time to bump the minimum boot JDK version for
> mainline/JDK 19.
>
> Testing: tier1-5, GHA builds
Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8102
On Thu, 7 Apr 2022 21:20:20 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> This is to upgrade the CLDR data from version 39 to version 41 which was
> released yesterday. The vast majority of the changes are basically replacing
> the CLDR data, along with tools/testcase alignments. Here is the link to CLDR
> v41's
On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 20:17:52 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> This is to upgrade the CLDR data from version 39 to version 41 which was
>> released yesterday. The vast majority of the changes are basically replacing
>> the CLDR data, along with tools/testcase alignments. Here is the link to
>> CLDR
On Wed, 18 May 2022 14:46:42 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
> Replaces usages of articles that follow each other in all combinations:
> a/the, an?/an?, the/the…
>
> It's the last issue in the series, and it still touches different areas of
> the code.
Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).
On Tue, 31 May 2022 20:32:13 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Time to start getting ready for JDK 20...
>
> Joe Darcy has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in
> by the merge/rebase. The pull
On Thu, 26 May 2022 23:05:32 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Time to start getting ready for JDK 20...
>
> Joe Darcy has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Respond to review feedback.
Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).
On Thu, 2 Jun 2022 17:00:35 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Time to start getting ready for JDK 20...
>
> Joe Darcy has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in
> by the merge/rebase. The pull
On Mon, 23 May 2022 10:04:14 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> Testing ispell + shell magic to locate typos. It worked, but is not scalable
> to the entire JDK. :-( Keep the fixes for the problems found in the make
> directory, though.
Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).
-
PR:
On Thu, 26 May 2022 23:05:32 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Time to start getting ready for JDK 20...
>
> Joe Darcy has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Respond to review feedback.
Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).
On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 01:03:47 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Time to start getting ready for JDK 20...
>
> Joe Darcy has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in
> by the merge/rebase. The pull
88 matches
Mail list logo
