> On 7 Mar, 2018, at 11:34 pm, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> Ah, totally missed that those were wrong as well. The values for
> dropped, overlimits and requeues are not printed by the cake-specific
> code at all, so there is something else dubious going on.
Could they be pointer values?
-
Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant writes:
>> On 7 Mar 2018, at 12:59, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>
>>
>>> qdisc cake 8004: root refcnt 4486780 bandwidth 19900Kbit diffserv3
>>> dual-srchost nat rtt 100.0ms ptm overhead 4502152
>>> Sent 42615751 bytes 4491092 pkt (dropped 4491108, overlimits 4491124
> On 7 Mar, 2018, at 8:27 pm, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
> wrote:
>
>> Are you using the latest kernel code? Those values were added in an
>> incompatible manner, so if you don't have userspace and kernel code in
>> sync they'll be garbage, basically…
>
> I’m using latest commit on kernel space sc
> On 7 Mar 2018, at 18:27, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 7 Mar 2018, at 12:59, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>
>>
>>> qdisc cake 8004: root refcnt 4486780 bandwidth 19900Kbit diffserv3
>>> dual-srchost nat rtt 100.0ms ptm overhead 4502152
>>> Sent 42615751 bytes 4491092 p
> On 7 Mar 2018, at 12:59, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
>
>> qdisc cake 8004: root refcnt 4486780 bandwidth 19900Kbit diffserv3
>> dual-srchost nat rtt 100.0ms ptm overhead 4502152
>> Sent 42615751 bytes 4491092 pkt (dropped 4491108, overlimits 4491124
>> requeues 4491152)
>> backlog 0b 4
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 7:52 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Dave Taht writes:
>
>> So it sounds like all the individual pieces are sync'd again?
>>
>> 4.16-rc4 is out, so there are several weeks left to make the net-next
>> window. I note that I don't feel strongly (never had) that I should b
Dave Taht writes:
> So it sounds like all the individual pieces are sync'd again?
>
> 4.16-rc4 is out, so there are several weeks left to make the net-next
> window. I note that I don't feel strongly (never had) that I should be
> the one to make the net-next submission, just so long as it now ge
So it sounds like all the individual pieces are sync'd again?
4.16-rc4 is out, so there are several weeks left to make the net-next
window. I note that I don't feel strongly (never had) that I should be
the one to make the net-next submission, just so long as it now gets
through checkpatch (?)...
Sebastian Moeller writes:
>> diff --git a/tc/q_cake.c b/tc/q_cake.c
>> index e21552e8..95301b41 100644
>> --- a/tc/q_cake.c
>> +++ b/tc/q_cake.c
>> @@ -243,12 +243,22 @@ static int cake_parse_opt(struct qdisc_util *qu, int
>> argc, char **argv,
>>/* Typical VDSL2 framing schemes,
Hi Toke,
> On Mar 7, 2018, at 13:59, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant writes:
>
>> I don’t the column alignment can be correct because the print lines don’t
>> include a leading space, so columns can run into each other.
>>
>> fprintf(f, "%12u", tst->unresponse_flo
Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant writes:
> I don’t the column alignment can be correct because the print lines don’t
> include a leading space, so columns can run into each other.
>
> fprintf(f, "%12u", tst->unresponse_flows);
> v
> fprintf(f, " %12u", tst->unresponse_flows);
>
> The header lines are pro
I don’t the column alignment can be correct because the print lines don’t
include a leading space, so columns can run into each other.
fprintf(f, "%12u", tst->unresponse_flows);
v
fprintf(f, " %12u", tst->unresponse_flows);
The header lines are probably wrong. Should be as per
https://github.c
Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant writes:
>> On 7 Mar 2018, at 10:31, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>
>>>
>>
>> Please don't put something different into LEDE than what we're working
>> on upstreaming. It is difficult enough to keep track of the different
>> versions as they are. The tc-adv repo is al
Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant writes:
> There were some useful stats column re-alignment changes as well,
> wonder if you got those?
Probably not, as that code is not longer directly diff'able,
unfortunately... The json-related changes were fairly intrusive...
Eyeballing the diff, however, I *think*
Hi Kevin,
> On Mar 7, 2018, at 12:07, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 7 Mar 2018, at 10:31, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>
>>>
>>
>> Please don't put something different into LEDE than what we're working
>> on upstreaming. It is difficult enough to keep track of the diff
There were some useful stats column re-alignment changes as well, wonder if you
got those?
> On 7 Mar 2018, at 10:36, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes:
>
>> Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant writes:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>>
>>>
On 7 Mar 2018, at 08:50, Toke Høilan
> On 7 Mar 2018, at 10:31, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
>>
>
> Please don't put something different into LEDE than what we're working
> on upstreaming. It is difficult enough to keep track of the different
> versions as they are. The tc-adv repo is already rebased on the upstream
> iproute
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes:
> Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant writes:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 7 Mar 2018, at 08:50, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>>
>>> Jonathan Morton writes:
>>>
> On 6 Mar, 2018, at 11:06 pm, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> ...on the iproute2 side the onl
Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant writes:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
>> On 7 Mar 2018, at 08:50, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>
>> Jonathan Morton writes:
>>
On 6 Mar, 2018, at 11:06 pm, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
...on the iproute2 side the only
thing missing before we can attempt an u
Hi All,
> On 7 Mar 2018, at 08:50, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> Jonathan Morton writes:
>
>>> On 6 Mar, 2018, at 11:06 pm, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>>
>>> ...on the iproute2 side the only
>>> thing missing before we can attempt an upstream submission is an update
>>> of the man
Jonathan Morton writes:
>> On 6 Mar, 2018, at 11:06 pm, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>
>> ...on the iproute2 side the only
>> thing missing before we can attempt an upstream submission is an update
>> of the man page, as far as I can tell. Any volunteers to do that? :)
>
> I could look into t
21 matches
Mail list logo
