[Cake] Per-host fairness

I am trying the cobalt branch along with the 950-add-cake-to-tc.patch from lede-git on Archlinux. However, I cannot get per-host fairness as expected, neither with IPv4 behind NAT, nor with IPv6. Having host A downloading from 2 sites and host B from 1, A gets always 1/3 of available bandwidth.

[Cake] why "triple-isolate"? Why not just "isolate?"

see thread: http://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX/Cake-compiled-for-the-EdgeRouter-devices/m-p/1706441/highlight/false#M132430 -- Dave Täht Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software! http://blog.cerowrt.org ___ Cake mailing list

Re: [Cake] Per-host fairness

I meant B gets always 1/3 of the bandwidth. It also gets worse if A is using bittorrent. The setup with cake doesn't involve tc-flow or marking packets with iptables. On October 16, 2016 11:57:03 AM EDT, "G. Amanakis" wrote: >I am trying the cobalt branch along with the 950-add-cake-to-tc.patch

Re: [Cake] Per-host fairness

Hi, Could you also try dual-srchost on egress and dual-srchost on ingress, please. These promise per-IP fairness at the first level and per-flow fairness "inside" each IP. So if you think through it you can setup the ingress and egress shapers to aim for per-internal-IP address which I believe

Re: [Cake] why "triple-isolate"? Why not just "isolate?"

Hi Dave, Cake offers three relevant per-IP "isolation" options, dual-srchost, dual-dsthost, and triple-isolate. The dual options are relatively straightforward, they promise to separate by either SRC or DST up address of the packets, allowing easy prediction what they should do to a given set o