Re: [Cake] Cake not more CPU efficient than HTB+FQ-CoDel (anymore)?

> On 11 Apr, 2018, at 6:24 pm, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > > So, um, did we cram so many features into Cake that it no longer uses > less CPU? Can anyone confirm these results? To be sure about this, it seems wise to configure Cake to turn off as many of the new features as

Re: [Cake] Cake not more CPU efficient than HTB+FQ-CoDel (anymore)?

For what it’s worth, that’s what I also saw testing Cake on the APU2 late last year, and the ER-X platform earlier. I actually never knew that Cake used less CPU at some point. Sorry for no supporting detail... :) Pete > On Apr 11, 2018, at 5:24 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:

Re: [Cake] Cake not more CPU efficient than HTB+FQ-CoDel (anymore)?

> On 11 Apr, 2018, at 8:15 pm, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > > Also would be nice to get a measure of the smoothness of the > shaper; will see if I can't extract that from a pcap file or > something I remember using tcptrace for that purpose, once upon a time. - Jonathan

Re: [Cake] Cake not more CPU efficient than HTB+FQ-CoDel (anymore)?

Pete Heist writes: > For what it’s worth, that’s what I also saw testing Cake on the APU2 > late last year, and the ER-X platform earlier. I actually never knew > that Cake used less CPU at some point. Sorry for no supporting > detail... :) Anecdotal supporting evidence is

Re: [Cake] Cake not more CPU efficient than HTB+FQ-CoDel (anymore)?

Jonathan Morton writes: >> On 11 Apr, 2018, at 6:24 pm, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: >> >> So, um, did we cram so many features into Cake that it no longer uses >> less CPU? Can anyone confirm these results? > > To be sure about this, it seems wise to

Re: [Cake] Cake not more CPU efficient than HTB+FQ-CoDel (anymore)?

> On 11 Apr, 2018, at 8:47 pm, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > >>> Also would be nice to get a measure of the smoothness of the >>> shaper; will see if I can't extract that from a pcap file or >>> something >> >> I remember using tcptrace for that purpose, once upon a time. > >

Re: [Cake] Cake not more CPU efficient than HTB+FQ-CoDel (anymore)?

Sorry, just looked at the code and my recollection is wrong. I could have sworn that I purged cake as a shaper from simple.qos when I created piece_of_cake, but apparently that was just a fever dream... Sorry for the noise. > On Apr 11, 2018, at 21:26, Sebastian Moeller

Re: [Cake] Cake not more CPU efficient than HTB+FQ-CoDel (anymore)?

On April 11, 2018 8:55:12 PM GMT+02:00, "Jonas Mårtensson" wrote: >On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 7:15 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen >wrote: > >> Jonathan Morton writes: >> >> >> On 11 Apr, 2018, at 6:24 pm, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen

Re: [Cake] Cake not more CPU efficient than HTB+FQ-CoDel (anymore)?

Well, simplest.qos.help says "Simplest possible configuration: HTB rate limiter with your qdisc attached" so that is probably also a bit misleading. /Jonas On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 9:30 PM, Sebastian Moeller wrote: > Sorry, > > just looked at the code and my recollection is