On dinsdag 3 december 2019 15:54:53 CET Carl Schwan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wanted to know if we could change the Qt dependency from Qt 5.3 to Qt 5.9
> at least.
>
> I think some parts already depends on Qt 5.7 at least. For example in
> Calligra Gemini, there is
> a dependency to Kirigami, that
Hello,
I wanted to know if we could change the Qt dependency from Qt 5.3 to Qt 5.9 at
least.
I think some parts already depends on Qt 5.7 at least. For example in Calligra
Gemini, there is
a dependency to Kirigami, that depends on Qt Quick Control 2 introduced in Qt
5.7.
I suppose there are
Ok, thanks all, we'll stay put on 5.3 fttb.
Although I would be veeery suprised if it actually compiles, new stuff
seems to just creep in.
Anybody has a 5.3 system available?
Cheers,
Dag
Jaroslaw Staniek skrev den 2019-01-15 21:25:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 at 21:13, Adam Pigg wrote:
Sailfish
On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 at 21:13, Adam Pigg wrote:
> Sailfish will shortly (tm) be upgrading to 5.9 so that wont block for
> much longer i hope. My understanding is they are working out the
> legal issues around the license changes ... technically the port is
> ready. I dont really understand the
Sailfish will shortly (tm) be upgrading to 5.9 so that wont block for
much longer i hope. My understanding is they are working out the
legal issues around the license changes ... technically the port is
ready. I dont really understand the issue myself!
On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 at 12:01, René J.V.
On Tuesday January 15 2019 12:53:03 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> If there's no reason to force upgrade, I would not. Also (guess what) LTS
> distros seem refuse to upgrade without users doing extra steps.
Amen to that!
I'm very annoyed by the fact that KF5 Frameworks just moved to Qt 5.10, for no
On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 at 12:44, wrote:
> Any reason not to require qt 5.9?
> We are at 5.3 atm.
>
Not strictly related to calligra.git but similar case for KEXI/KEXI
frameworks: it is caused by Sailfish depending on such older Qt.
If there's no reason to force upgrade, I would not. Also (guess
Any reason not to require qt 5.9?
We are at 5.3 atm.
Am Mittwoch, 10. August 2016, 14:27:06 CEST schrieb Dag:
> I added a 5.7 specific thing recently, which prompts the question:
> which qt version will be used in the release?
I personally would not mind bumping the minimal required versions to Qt 5.6
and KF5 5.16 at least.
Reasoning:
No
On Wednesday August 10 2016 14:49:35 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>I think traditionally even 5.6+ -only things shall be ifdef'd.
>
>I am sure 5.7+ things *should* be and the code should compile with 5.5.
>(Assuming we're targeting LTS distros and alike that may even have 5.3,
>which is a reasonable
l-boun...@kde.org] On
Behalf Of
Dag
Sent: 10. august 2016 14:27
To: calligra-devel@kde.org
Subject: Qt version
I added a 5.7 specific thing recently, which prompts the question:
which qt version will be used in the release?
Cheers, Dag
--
regards, Jaroslaw Staniek
KDE:
: A world-wide network of so
Sent: 10. august 2016 14:27
> To: calligra-devel@kde.org
> Subject: Qt version
>
> I added a 5.7 specific thing recently, which prompts the question:
> which qt version will be used in the release?
>
> Cheers, Dag
>
>
--
regards, Jaroslaw Staniek
KDE:
: A worl
My build machine (debian) is still 5.6 so until they are at 5.7 I cannot
agree to bumping higher than 5.6
-Original Message-
From: calligra-devel [mailto:calligra-devel-boun...@kde.org] On Behalf Of
Dag
Sent: 10. august 2016 14:27
To: calligra-devel@kde.org
Subject: Qt version
I added
I added a 5.7 specific thing recently, which prompts the question:
which qt version will be used in the release?
Cheers, Dag
14 matches
Mail list logo
