Re: Maintenance release of 2.1

2011-10-03 Thread Magnus Holm
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 14:26, Jenna Fox a...@creativepony.com wrote: I wouldn't bother with reducing the revision number. If anything having weirdly high ones makes the project seem more alive and active. Is the minor number even functionally useful here? Maybe we should ditch that and just

Re: Maintenance release of 2.1

2011-10-03 Thread Jenna Fox
True that. Meanwhile, have you guys seen http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/ ? It looks pretty nice, and I imagine something like that could be pretty powerful if deeply integrated with a version of markaby, as a 'ui toolkit for the web' sort of thing - a nice sensible clean default style for

Re: Maintenance release of 2.1

2011-10-03 Thread Bartosz DziewoƄski
Personally I hate it. It's like table border=2 and font size=7 once again, except this time camouflaged as CSS classes. The only good things in there are either styled pretty much the same way by default (like, say, headers), or require a line of code (@basefont, layouts). -- Matma Rex

Re: Maintenance release of 2.1

2011-10-03 Thread Jenna Fox
Oh right, but you can use that LESS thing I think to compile the bootstrap properties in to your regular CSS, so you keep using good quality selectors, and bootstrap essentially augments your CSS with useful macros. Another way to do it is to define markaby helpers for each kind of thing, so you

Maintenance release of 2.1

2011-10-02 Thread Magnus Holm
I'm thinking of releasing 2.1.458 which includes a few more features (better cookie support, inline templates etc), but mainly to fix some incompatibility issues with Rack. I'm not going to document the new features yet, so consider them experimental in this patch-release. As for the version,