Urgh. I just turn the validation in markaby off pretty much all of the time -
like strictly typed languages, I find it gets in my way more often than it
helps me find errors.
Instead of using the xhtml_strict macro you could do it yourself:
self !DOCTYPE whatever blah blah\n
html lang =
I'm not too bothered about 3k. But I think what Nokan's saying is that
he'd like Camping to remain functioning as it is so he can continue to
run his apps as they're set up now, but that extra features could be
added with an optional `require 'camping/new_extra_stuff`... - Nokan,
is this
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Dave Everitt dever...@innotts.co.ukwrote:
I'm not too bothered about 3k. But I think what Nokan's saying is that
he'd like Camping to remain functioning as it is so he can continue to run
his apps as they're set up now, but that extra features could be added
I would leave the name camping for the original gem, and would choose
another
one for the fork.
But exactly what are those features that you (all) would like to add to
camping?
- before/after methods of controllers,
- something around serving static files and R(),
- ???
Actually I think it's
W dniu 16 kwietnia 2012 20:50 użytkownik Nokan Emiro
uzleep...@gmail.com napisał:
Actually I think it's not logical that you can build HTML by default using
Markaby, but you can't build CSS in the same way.
You never need to insert any variables into your CSS code. (If you do,
you're doing it
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:20:18PM +0200, Bartosz Dziewoński wrote:
W dniu 16 kwietnia 2012 20:50 użytkownik Nokan Emiro
uzleep...@gmail.com napisał:
Actually I think it's not logical that you can build HTML by default using
Markaby, but you can't build CSS in the same way.
You never need
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 22:14, Nokan Emiro uzleep...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/4/16 Bartosz Dziewoński matma@gmail.com
W dniu 16 kwietnia 2012 20:50 użytkownik Nokan Emiro
uzleep...@gmail.com napisał:
Actually I think it's not logical that you can build HTML by default
using
Markaby, but
I'm totally convinced... so I'm going to download the whole source
before the guys start to rewrite it as a modern framework... :)
But to be frank, this, for instance, is not so great to read:
https://github.com/camping/camping/blob/master/lib/camping.rb
I mean I'm big http://catseye.tc/ fan,
Shit! If you told me about it a few hours ago, I wouldn't bother myself
writing a RobotsTxt Controller...
__END__
@@ /style.css
* { margin: 0; padding: 0 }
And Camping will serve it for you. See also:
https://github.com/camping/camping/blob/master/test/app_file.rb
Well the point of the original camping was *not* to be easy to read nor to
have camping used in the next big commercial project. The annotated version
gives you pretty much all you want if you want to read it :)
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Bartosz Dziewoński matma@gmail.comwrote:
W
For now I'm feeling like a pretty bad maintainer. I'm not using
Camping enough to see where things need to be fixed, I'm crappy at
actually shipping stuff, and I'm not sure if I believe that Camping is
a correct starting point for a new framework
Hey Magnus! I think that you are a great
I think Nokan has a good point there: it is not easy for people new to
Camping to know about the trick to compile/process/compact the source code.
So an idea for the new version could be to leave the source as is
(unabridged). Plus this makes debugging easier.
:-)
On 4/16/2012 2:59 PM, Bartosz
12 matches
Mail list logo
