Haha, well done :)
Small rectification: Camping also allows multiple views per controller
2008/5/15 John Beppu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hey Campers,
>
> I liked Camping so much that I had to "port" it to Perl. My framework is
> called Squatting (as in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squatting), and y
module MyApp
module Controllers
class Index < R '/', '/(.*)'
def get(opts = nil)
@opts = opts
render( opts ? :opts : :index )
end
end
end
module Views
def index
h1 "Regular"
end
def opts
h1 "Opts"
p @opts
end
end
end
__
Ok noted, it should probably be fixed once camping is released on rubyforge
2008/5/10 Trevor Johns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I've noticed that the copy of Mongrel installed by the camping-omnibus gem
> doesn't work with Ruby 1.8.6. Or to be more specific, cgi_multipart_eof_fix
> (which Mongrel is dep
Nice catch,
cookies support never really felt complete to me. Maybe we should put
it in a different module ?
Cheers,
zimbatm
___
Camping-list mailing list
Camping-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
2008/5/22 Ernest Prabhakar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So, it sounds like there's a few options:
>
> a) Automate the creation of the obfuscated version from the unabridged
> version
Last time I checked, Ruby2Ruby didn't recognize all camping constructs
but it might be better now.
> b) Tweak the system
> The problem is that almost all app require 'camping' and when bin/camping
> require 'camping-unabridged' things gets pretty messy.
Right, didn't thought about that.. well then we have to come up with a
Ruby2Ruby version, isn't it ?
___
Camping-list mai
> How is camping.rb created from camping-unabridged.rb? By hand?
Err.. yes. This is a kind of art you know ?
___
Camping-list mailing list
Camping-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
2008/5/22 _why <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Splendid! If we can say Camping, the 3K Microframework, then I
> think we will really have a reason to bump the big number. I'll wait
> for a reaction from zimbatm, but I am euphoric about these changes.
Wasn't th
2008/5/23 Magnus Holm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So should I just merge/rebase everything to my master, so _why can merge
> it into his? Some more notes:
>
> * camping/db.rb -> camping/ar.rb
> * camping/session.rb -> camping/ar/session.rb
> * CookieSession -> camping/session.rb
>
> The documentation an
Just wanted to comment a bit more :
2008/5/21 Magnus Holm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I've just finished rewriting Camping to use Rack in the "core". I got rid of
> (a little less) than 1kB in camping.rb and removed lots of un-necessary files
> (lib/server/*.rb, fastcgi.rb & mongrel.rb).
This is good
2008/5/25 Ernest Prabhakar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Z,
>
> On May 25, 2008, at 5:47 AM, zimbatm wrote:
>
>>> I haven't touched camping.rb at all, do we really need to prove that it's
>>> a
>>> micro-framework? It just makes developmen
2008/5/26 _why <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 02:47:39PM +0200, zimbatm wrote:
>> This is not that hard to do. Maybe I should add some shortening tricks
>> document.
>> I propose platterizing to be done only before release.
>
> No, let's not
eird inclusion mechanism I wish I didn't had to do.
Ruby also has some quirks regarding module inclusion into other
modules and late method definition in reopened parent module. So while
your patch might fix the most cases, I believe there is more work to
be done here. Anyways, kee
favor of some Rails (!) goodness.
Cheers,
zimbatm
___
Camping-list mailing list
Camping-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
The concept is fun but is it really used by people out there ?
___
Camping-list mailing list
Camping-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
class H < Hash
# Gets or sets keys in the hash.
#
# @cookies.my_favorite = :macadamian
# @cookies.my_favorite
# => :macadamian
#
def method_missing(m,*a)
x=(m.to_s=~/=$/?self[$`]=a[0]:a==[]?self[m.to_s]:super)
x.kind_of?(Hash) ? H[x] : x
end
Yum. Did you try just setting YourApp::H = Mash ? If it works like
this out of the box
then we can keep the simpler solution and provide a recipe to work with mash ?
2008/7/23 Magnus Holm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm playing with Mash (http://mash-hash.rubyforge.org/) which has some really
> nifty s
> So we have to alias self[] to self.new...
>
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:10 AM, zimbatm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yum. Did you try just setting YourApp::H = Mash ? If it works like
>> this out of the box
>> then we can keep the simpler solution and provide a re
= block
end
# So now on your view
def some_view
# use that method if you need the right pane
_right_pane do
# Some code in the right pane
end
# And here goes your regular view
end
end
Cheers,
zimbatm
___
Camping-list mail
Hi Magnus,
If I remember well, I am the one who introduced AND removed
Camping::Apps. I'm not sure anymore but I think it wasn't really used
and that solutions never really satisfied me. Do you have any use for
it ?
Cheers,
zimbatm
___
Ca
7360)
0.04 0.01 0.05 ( 0.057386)
0.04 0.01 0.05 ( 0.057580)
Source : http://github.com/zimbatm/camping/tree/master
Cheers,
zimbatm
___
Camping-list mailing list
Camping-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
Now I remember, there is a quirk. Make sure to remove the old app in
the array when reloading the app in the Camping::Reloader.
Cheers,
zimbatm
___
Camping-list mailing list
Camping-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
Hi Garret,
check out why's repository on : http://github.com/why/camping
2008/9/5 Garret Buell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So I'm looking to get the latest, most very bleeding edge version of
> camping. The question is, who's got it? It seems I can get it from
> why
Looks all sane to me. Good job
___
Camping-list mailing list
Camping-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
Hi Magnus,
I prefer using method_missing, with string access for fallback when
key names are not compatible with ruby method names.
___
Camping-list mailing list
Camping-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Julik Tarkhanov
wrote:
> Why not just 2.0.0 with a tag, then 2.0.1 with a tag and so on? Then you
> also know everytime you release something you have a tag for it. And things
> like rebases will not ruin your schemes
+1
___
will continue to inspire people in your next
hobby.
cheers,
zimbatm
___
Camping-list mailing list
Camping-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
+1 for camping/camping at github . Also, why not use the github pages
to host the camping website
___
Camping-list mailing list
Camping-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
+1 for whywentcamping.com
___
Camping-list mailing list
Camping-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
Regarding SEO, isn't it enough to have some links from the ruby
community pointing to the camping homepage to have it on top-10 of
"ruby camping" search results ?
___
Camping-list mailing list
Camping-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listin
In any case, I just secured whywentcamping.com. For now it redirects
to camping.rubyforge.com
___
Camping-list mailing list
Camping-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
31 matches
Mail list logo
