Hi Robert,
Please verify that any Care2x install in a subfolder of a domain like
http://www.domain.com/care2x/ will not fail under the current
$_SERVER['SCRIPT_NAME'].
(hope there is no $_SERVER['SERVER_NAME'] variable since the older $PHP_SELF
was essentially $_SERVER['PHP_SELF'] which is a fu
Hi Muthu,
That would be great. Tomorrow I will be out - and back somewhere at
afternoon. Then I would do the same.
There are several things what waste the apache error logs what I want to
fix before I go to the front end and what there could be for an issue.
Just now I saw that there is a missi
Hi Muthu,
> Looked at the table and code bindings:
>
> Persons
> All Personell (Employee) are Persons
> All Patients are Persons
> No Login User is direclty releated to any Person (All users were Employees
> earlier, not anymore, the title tag is now a misnomer)
I think that has something to do
OK - we will leave it as is for now - $_SERVER['SERVER_NAME'] stays. Will
install afresh and see what happens.
Ap.Muthu
> Hi Muthu,
>
>
>> Rather than hardcoding the variable $_SERVER['SERVER_NAME'] everywhere,
>> we
>> can take advantage of the variable $PHP_SELF being globally declared in
>>
Hi Robert,
Just committed SVN 6711 - a couple of bytes that were different - checked it
in hex.
Will do a fresh install with theSVN and see what gives.
Looked at the table and code bindings:
Persons
All Personell (Employee) are Persons
All Patients are Persons
No Login User is direclty releated
Hi Muthu,
> Rather than hardcoding the variable $_SERVER['SERVER_NAME'] everywhere, we
> can take advantage of the variable $PHP_SELF being globally declared in
> AdoDB - just one place! If you are very sure of the consequences of
> $_SERVER['PHP_SELF'], then all we need to do is to re-assign
Hi Muthu,
> The value of some unicode characters have got mangled during your change in
> line 10 of file:
> modules/news/includes/inc_newstitle_clean.php
Luckily I found the original chars on other backup's, because that would
be impossible to redefine. Committed, should be in the TRUNK reposit
Hi Robert,
Rather than hardcoding the variable $_SERVER['SERVER_NAME'] everywhere, we
can take advantage of the variable $PHP_SELF being globally declared in
AdoDB - just one place! If you are very sure of the consequences of
$_SERVER['PHP_SELF'], then all we need to do is to re-assign the vari
Hi Muthu,
Yes, I saw that as well. Either in adodb there are such variables as
well in some other files what I let out for the moment.
But for the check if the file is called direct (that would represent an
intrusion) it should be corrected. I know that the
$_SERVER['SCRIPT_NAME'] will not make p
Hi Muthu,
Yes, that I did. The reason was that submenu_row_spacer.tpl had
an ../../ reference to pixel.gif what fits to modules, but not to
login.php stored in main.
All in all there was no bug, it was just producing apache error logs.
Now that is what I try to catch here as well.
That pixel.g
Hi Robert,
Please check the need to replace $PHP_SELF and revert it if needed.
The said variable is a clean value of $_SERVER['PHP_SELF'] and in some
instances made as $thisfle.
It is globally declared in AdoDB:
classes/adodb/adodb-pager.inc.php (lines 60/63)
classes/adodb/adodb-perf.inc.php (lin
Hi Robert,
You have corrected the path to pixel.gif in
/gui/smarty_template/templates/default/main/common/submenu_row_spacer.tpl
Any reason the above file chosen to be removed from inclusion in:
/gui/smarty_template/templates/default/main/login_config.tpl
So long the menu looked good without the
Hi Tim,
Exactly. But these are two topics when we look more in detail.
Topic 1: What fields must be there, and
Topic 2: What fields must be mandatory.
Topic 2 is more easy. When we focus now a main branch what is public,
then it should be have some standard settings. I am not that sure that
in
Hi Tim,
Exactly. But these are two topics when we look more in detail.
Topic 1: What fields must be there, and
Topic 2: What fields must be mandatory.
Topic 2 is more easy. When we focus now a main branch what is public,
then it should be have some standard settings. I am not that sure that
in
Robert,
I strongly believe that the registration screen should be as
configurable as possible. As we both know, hospitals in different
parts of the world have very different requirements for what data they
need to acquire at registration.
Thanks
Tim
On 16 September 2010 15:02, Robert Meggle wr
revision 6707, class_gui_person_show.php, line 370:
[...]
if (!$GLOBAL_CONFIG['person_insurance_1_nr_hide']&&$insurance_show&&
$insurance_nr){
[...]
And brings me to the question what fields must be mandatory at
registration and admission.
Please feel free to answer ;-)
Thanks
Robert
--
--
Hi GJ,
"Hardly Working" in English means "Not Working at all"
"Working Hard" is the right phrase here!
Regards,
Ap.Muthu
>
> hi Tim,
>
> Muthu and Robert are hardly working on releasing an 2.6.1 demo very
> shortly
>
> gj.
> On 2010-09-16 10:58.PD, Tim Schofield wrote:
>> But maybe it wo
Hi Gjergj,
Are we talking about an online demo, or one we can download and play with?
Thanks
Tim
On 16 September 2010 10:00, Gjergj Sheldija wrote:
>
> hi Tim,
>
> Muthu and Robert are hardly working on releasing an 2.6.1 demo very shortly
>
> gj.
> On 2010-09-16 10:58.PD, Tim Schofield wrote:
Hi Tim,
We are working on 2.6.1. stable. Then we can also think to focus the so
called "gettext" branch as 2.7 alpha. ;-)
http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/care2002/roadmap
Robert
Am Donnerstag, den 16.09.2010, 11:00 +0200 schrieb Gjergj Sheldija:
> hi Tim,
>
> Muthu and Robert are hardly work
Hi Gjergj,
Am Donnerstag, den 16.09.2010, 10:14 +0200 schrieb Gjergj Sheldija:
> for the migration to php 5x , you might need this :
> https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/care2002/wiki/MigrateToPHP5x
Yes, this is already done. But it would not check for non declared
variables. Most I fixed now I t
hi Tim,
Muthu and Robert are hardly working on releasing an 2.6.1 demo very shortly
gj.
On 2010-09-16 10:58.PD, Tim Schofield wrote:
> But maybe it would be good to release a 2.6 alpha, or beta release.
> That tends to encourage testing in my experience.
>
> Tim
>
>
> On 16 September 2010 09:07,
But maybe it would be good to release a 2.6 alpha, or beta release.
That tends to encourage testing in my experience.
Tim
On 16 September 2010 09:07, Robert Meggle wrote:
> Hi Muthu,
>
> You are never sleeping like me it seems :-D
>
> I have tested around yesterday a bit the ACL. Here I would s
for the migration to php 5x , you might need this :
https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/care2002/wiki/MigrateToPHP5x
gj,
--
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify appl
Hi Muthu,
You are never sleeping like me it seems :-D
I have tested around yesterday a bit the ACL. Here I would suggest to
simplify the process, because for now it is not understandable just for
user what must be done.
All other sections seems to work. For an release I would also first work
i
Hi,
http://care2002.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/care2002/care2x/trunk/?view=tar
That will get the latest (currently SVN 6700) on v2.6+ trunk.
It will be okay to place this under downloads (currently absent) section of
www.care2x.org .
Regards,
Ap.Muthu
> hi,
>
> you should use the trunk
>
> gj
hi,
you should use the trunk
gj.
On 2010-09-15 10:54.MD, Tim Schofield wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Should we be using the gettext branch or the trunk?
>
> Thanks
> Tim
>
>
> On 15 September 2010 21:44, Ap.Muthu wrote:
>> Hi Robert,
>>
>> Please pull a fresh one from SVN. That way if there are any delete
26 matches
Mail list logo
