Try:
"groovy { return attributes['wcWhitmanId'][0] + '@whitman.edu' }"
"wcWhitmanId'" is resolved internally as a multi-valued attribute.
On Thursday, May 7, 2020 at 6:03:11 AM UTC+4:30, Mike Osterman wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm setting up a SAML2 service and running into unexpected behavior
I am using cas 6.1.x version . I am trying to configure login web flow.
Please help with
--
- Website: https://apereo.github.io/cas
- Gitter Chatroom: https://gitter.im/apereo/cas
- List Guidelines: https://goo.gl/1VRrw7
- Contributions: https://goo.gl/mh7qDG
---
You received this message
Hello,
We are looking for an open source or proprietary IAM solution to use in our
university infrastructure but we are using CAS for our SSO solution. We do
not want to replace it so we want to use IAM together with CAS. Do you have
any suggestions for opensource and proprietary solution that
Hi Kazim, can I suggest a fully completed solution based on Apache Syncope
and Apereo CAS?
Please let me know if you need more info/details
Regards,
F.
Il gio 7 mag 2020, 12:32 Kazim Koybasi ha scritto:
> Hello,
>
> We are looking for an open source or proprietary IAM solution to use in
> our
Hi all,
I have multiple jdbc attributeRepositories that connect to the same DB.
Thus I just found out that each attributeRepository is using its own
Hikari ConnectionPool which makes sense if all would connect with
different Databases. In my case this is overhead.
Can I configure cas in a
Hi there.
I’d suggest you be a bit more specific regarding what you are trying to
accomplish.
Best,
D.
On May 7, 2020 at 04:16:28, 'Suhas Bansude' via CAS Community
(cas-user@apereo.org) wrote:
I am using cas 6.1.x version . I am trying to configure login web flow.
Please help with
--
-
Hello Fabio,
Sure. Can you provide more information about it ?
Regards.
On Thu, 7 May 2020 at 14:08, Fabio Martelli
wrote:
> Hi Kazim, can I suggest a fully completed solution based on Apache Syncope
> and Apereo CAS?
>
> Please let me know if you need more info/details
>
> Regards,
> F.
>
>
Thanks for response
I have 3 different projects. I want to connect these project with the help
of cas server. And avoid user to login concurrently among all these project.
After login success I want to add custom concurrent login check. If
concurrent login found I have to show logout previous
I recommend to use hazelcast cas ticket registry. In this case all nodes
will have information about all tickets. So you don't need sticky sessions
in this case.
On Thursday, April 23, 2020 at 3:30:25 PM UTC+3, Сергей Степанов wrote:
>
> Hello! I need your help.
>
>
>
> I have several nodes
This might help: https://apereo.github.io/2017/10/07/webflow-extcfg/
It talks about CAS5, but in modern CAS the mechanics are the same. If all else
fails, you might want to dive deep into CAS internals and study how CAS does
SWF configuration with its various modules that configure their SWF in
Indeed, that might be a good idea to reuse a global DataSource for all Jdbc
attributes repos. Currently it’s only possible if you have a globally defined
JNDI-bound DataSource (but who does JNDI these days?) ;-)
As could be seen here:
Second option (IMHO better, but that's point of view) is to use
Evolveum's midPoint.
It possesses a flexible authentication mechanism (
https://wiki.evolveum.com/display/midPoint/Flexible+Authentication+Configuration),
so you can use Apereo CAS as SAML IdP and Evolveum midPoint as SAML SP, for
Il 07/05/20 13:25, Kazim Koybasi ha scritto:
Hello Fabio,
Sure. Can you provide more information about it ?
Hi Kazim, thank you for your question.
First of all, a very brief introduction about Apache Syncope [1].
Apache Syncope is an Open Source Identity Management software.
Syncope allows
That did it--thanks!
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 1:04 AM Misagh Moayyed
wrote:
> Try:
>
> "groovy { return attributes['wcWhitmanId'][0] + '@whitman.edu' }"
>
> "wcWhitmanId'" is resolved internally as a multi-valued attribute.
>
>
> On Thursday, May 7, 2020 at 6:03:11 AM UTC+4:30, Mike Osterman
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 2:41 PM Baron Fujimoto wrote:
> So judging by the DEBUG timestamps, only 4 ms elapses between the start of
> the AuthN attempt and the SearchValidator timeout failure. Should I try to
> corroborate this vis LDAP logs?
>
Couldn't hurt, but I wonder if there is some other
15 matches
Mail list logo