Does anyone else has the same problem with 0.4?
As far as I know Digg and Rackspace are biggest adopters of Cassandra. They
must be running 0.3 then.
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Igor Katkov ikat...@gmail.com wrote:
full log is here (new)
http://www.katkovonline.com/cassandra-log.zip
Hello all,
We were just at Facebook talking to some of its developers and asked
them about Cassandra. The people in the room had no idea what we were
talking about. One of them mentioned that they open sourced the Facebook
data store three years ago but it was awful and no longer used
internally.
I imagine you weren't talking to the right developers. :D Cassandra
was open sourced last year.
Joe
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Todd English tengl...@popcap.com wrote:
Hello all,
We were just at Facebook talking to some of its developers and asked
them about Cassandra. The people in
You must have been talking to the wrong developers.
Facebook open-sourced Cassandra in early 2008. In August 2008 they
wrote about this publically, at
http://www.new.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=24413138919 where they
state:
First deployment of Cassandra system within Facebook was for the
Inbox
Are you sure that is the line in question? if
(!clHeader_.isDirty(id)) is part of maybeUpdateHeader which does not
appear in your stack trace.
For me after the patches in trunk line 342 is
rm.removeColumnFamily(columnFamily);
but that can never be null so I think maybe
