Sorry about that!
Continuing:
And in that case when using rows as indexes instead of columns we only need
to read
that specific row and might be more efficient in that case than to read a
big row every
time?
--
Regards Erik
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Erik Holstad erikhols...@gmail.com wrote:
So that is kinda of what I want to do, but I want to go from
a row with multiple columns to multiple rows with one column
Right, and I'm trying to tell you that this is a bad idea unless you
are worried about exhausting
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Erik Holstad erikhols...@gmail.com wrote:
Haha!
Thanks. Well I'm z little bit worried about this but since the indexes are
pretty
small I don't think it is going to be too bad. But was mostly thinking about
performance and and having the index row as a
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Erik Holstad erikhols...@gmail.com
wrote:
Haha!
Thanks. Well I'm z little bit worried about this but since the indexes
are
pretty
small I don't think it is going to be too bad. But
Then you definitely want one row, range queries are slower than we'd
like right now. (Ticket to fix that:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-821)
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Erik Holstad erikhols...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Jonathan Ellis
